# 301/302 Question..

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [August 26, 2009, 9:56pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904 "2009-08-26T21:56:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![harpies](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/0ea827/32.png) [@harpies](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/harpies)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2009, 9:56pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/1 "2009-08-26T21:56:36Z")

</div>

thanks for clicking my post..

i just want to confirm about this test product..

301 = sexual

302 = social

is it right??

so i don’t need to combine any other social phero when using this?

just 2 spray of 301 and 2 spay of 302?

i am excited to test this phero and report all the results..

thanks..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vaccine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/vaccine/32/2381_2.png) [@Vaccine](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Vaccine)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2009, 10:33pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/2 "2009-08-26T22:33:05Z")

</div>

I found them to have both sexual and socials in 301/302. Search and read the many many reports.

You will have to work to find your sweet spot. I have worn 3 sprays and as much as 6 ( when Steve’s bad influence took over).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2009, 10:41pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/3 "2009-08-26T22:41:31Z")

</div>

They are both sexual attraction mixes with social aspects, based on my ICM 1A and 1B mixes. 301 is the 1A which has Beta Androstenol and 1B is 302 which has Alpha Androstenol. Other than that they are the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KnowledgeIsPower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/knowledgeispower/32/1201_2.png) [@KnowledgeIsPower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/KnowledgeIsPower)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2009, 11:00pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/4 "2009-08-26T23:00:08Z")

</div>

> [@Steve](#):
>
> They are both sexual attraction mixes with social aspects, based on my ICM 1A and 1B mixes. 301 is the 1A which has Beta Androstenol and 1B is 302 which has Alpha Androstenol. Other than that they are the same.

I thought it was 5b that had the Alpha -nol? 1B replaced the TAC and -none with [P83](https://a314.com/product/p83/), right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BLADE](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/blade/32/2083_2.png) [@BLADE](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/BLADE)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2009, 11:35pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/5 "2009-08-26T23:35:52Z")

</div>

> [@KnowledgeIsPower](#):
>
> I thought it was 5b that had the Alpha -nol? 1B replaced the TAC and -none with P83, right?

That’s what I thought as well from the published recipes…

**ICM 0.25.05a** TAA 4 mcg per sprayAlpha Androstenol 5 mcg per sprayP93 3 mcg per sprayP74 5 mcg per sprayP83 5 mcg per spray **ICM 0.25.05b** TAA 4 mcg per sprayAlpha Androstenol 5 MCG PER SPRAYP93 3 mcg per sparyP74 5 mcg per spray [None 5 mcg per spray](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microgram)TAC 5 mcg per spray **ICM 0.25.1a** TAA 4 mcg per sprayBeta Androstenol 5 MCG PER SPRAYP93 3 mcg per sparyP74 5 mcg per spray [None 5 mcg per spray](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microgram)TAC 5 mcg per spray **ICM 0.25.1b** TAA 4 mcg per sprayBeta Androstenol 5 mcg per sprayP93 3 mcg per sprayP74 5 mcg per sprayP83 5 mcg per spray

And I’m very curious as a massive [P83](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/p83/) fan - would love to add some to these but have held off thinking 302 already had it and i didn’t want to skew my testing…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KnowledgeIsPower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/knowledgeispower/32/1201_2.png) [@KnowledgeIsPower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/KnowledgeIsPower)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2009, 11:39pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/6 "2009-08-26T23:39:14Z")

</div>

> [@BLADE](#):
>
> That’s what I thought as well from the published recipes…
> 
> **ICM 0.25.05a** TAA 4 mcg per sprayAlpha Androstenol 5 mcg per sprayP93 3 mcg per sprayP74 5 mcg per sprayP83 5 mcg per spray **ICM 0.25.05b** TAA 4 mcg per sprayAlpha Androstenol 5 MCG PER SPRAYP93 3 mcg per sparyP74 5 mcg per spray[None 5 mcg per spray](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microgram)TAC 5 mcg per spray **ICM 0.25.1a** TAA 4 mcg per sprayBeta Androstenol 5 MCG PER SPRAYP93 3 mcg per sparyP74 5 mcg per spray[None 5 mcg per spray](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microgram)TAC 5 mcg per spray **ICM 0.25.1b** TAA 4 mcg per sprayBeta Androstenol 5 mcg per sprayP93 3 mcg per sprayP74 5 mcg per sprayP83 5 mcg per spray
> 
> And I’m very curious as a massive P83 fan - would love to add some to these but have held off thinking 302 already had it and i didn’t want to skew my testing…

I was actually planning on testing [P83](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/p83/) with MX301 later this week, will let you know how it goes 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vaccine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/vaccine/32/2381_2.png) [@Vaccine](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Vaccine)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2009, 12:24am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/7 "2009-08-27T00:24:53Z")

</div>

> [@Steve](#):
>
> Other than that they are the same.

Steve, did you forget to mention they kick ass?

Or are you being modest?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2009, 7:02pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/8 "2009-08-27T19:02:45Z")

</div>

> [@Vaccine](#):
>
> Steve, did you forget to mention they kick ass?
> 
> Or are you being modest?

I’m Humble 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vaccine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/vaccine/32/2381_2.png) [@Vaccine](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Vaccine)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2009, 3:12am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/9 "2009-08-28T03:12:37Z")

</div>

Well said, sir!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Namaste1001](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/namaste1001/32/1222_2.png) [@Namaste1001](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Namaste1001)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2009, 11:42am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/10 "2009-08-28T11:42:32Z")

</div>

Steve can you clear that up? I thought IB had the p83 and beta in it, no?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2009, 5:52pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/11 "2009-08-28T17:52:06Z")

</div>

> [@Namaste1001](#):
>
> Steve can you clear that up? I thought IB had the p83 and beta in it, no?

You’re right, but those were MX303 and MX304

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RaiderMagic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bc79bd/32.png) [@RaiderMagic](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/RaiderMagic)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2009, 9:02am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/12 "2009-09-07T09:02:43Z")

</div>

Good for attracting Asian women? Sexual but social?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2009, 6:12pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/13 "2009-09-14T18:12:23Z")

</div>

> [@RaiderMagic](#):
>
> Good for attracting Asian women? Sexual but social?

Try it and let us know 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Namaste1001](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/namaste1001/32/1222_2.png) [@Namaste1001](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Namaste1001)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2009, 9:17pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/14 "2009-09-14T21:17:14Z")

</div>

So is .05b mx302 Steve?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2009, 6:44pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/15 "2009-09-18T18:44:46Z")

</div>

> [@Namaste1001](#):
>
> So is .05b mx302 Steve?

From my testing perspective I can say yes and with 100% certainty. Anol and I do not mix well, but Bnol and I do. MX301 works where as MX302 does not work very well. That’s how I know.😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reclipse](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/reclipse/32/773_2.png) [@Reclipse](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Reclipse)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2009, 6:51pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/16 "2009-09-18T18:51:29Z")

</div>

This makes me very much excited to know I have a 301 coming pdq

win!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2009, 7:36pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/17 "2009-09-18T19:36:13Z")

</div>

I meant to say that MX302 does not work for me in the sense of how I want it to work. MX302 works very well for anyone who likes Anol.

It’s the same reason I’m not a fan of spaceland. I can’t get it to work right for me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reclipse](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/reclipse/32/773_2.png) [@Reclipse](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Reclipse)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2009, 7:38pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/18 "2009-09-18T19:38:14Z")

</div>

could you elaborate on it ‘not working right’?

Does it give you conflicting effects compared to what most people have reported? howso?

I was thinking of picking it up because it seems like it could be some fun to play with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [September 23, 2009, 6:09pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/19 "2009-09-23T18:09:44Z")

</div>

> [@Reclipse](#):
>
> could you elaborate on it ‘not working right’?
> 
> Does it give you conflicting effects compared to what most people have reported? howso?
> 
> I was thinking of picking it up because it seems like it could be some fun to play with.

Its nothing to do with the mix! Its the Anol I am not a fan of. I’m already gregarious so Anol pushes it over the top and I become the clown. Bnol is more centered for me 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reclipse](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/reclipse/32/773_2.png) [@Reclipse](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Reclipse)\
**Post date:** [September 23, 2009, 6:12pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/20 "2009-09-23T18:12:11Z")

</div>

Ah… I was just curious of your reaction to the Anol. Makes sense whereas the effects are pretty straightforward with it inducing the chattiness etc. Didn’t notice as much self effect but I will be paying more attention to that in the next round of testing =)

[Next page](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904.md?page=2)
