# 6 pack thread (The Great Androstenone Experiment Parts 1 & 2)...

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/6-pack-thread-the-great-androstenone-experiment-parts-1-2/189>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [March 5, 2006, 10:13am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/6-pack-thread-the-great-androstenone-experiment-parts-1-2/189 "2006-03-05T10:13:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 20

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MHarris](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mharris/32/2107_2.png) [@MHarris](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/MHarris)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2006, 3:29pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/6-pack-thread-the-great-androstenone-experiment-parts-1-2/189/20 "2006-03-19T15:29:02Z")

</div>

> [@M&M](#):
>
> So the 49.95 is for the THREE pack and not the SIX, Mr. Harris? It sounds that way and I just want to be sure. Pongo has me curious about T1 & T2. Those and Shine are stuck in my head.

That link is $10 off 1 & 2. You get both for $49.95 (i.e., all 6 bottles).

> [@](#):
>
> Also, it sounds like there will be no more Ts after they run out … is that true?

There’ll be about 50 sets going out total.

> [@](#):
>
> Do you share where your blueprint on your mones are heading (future plans/thoughts/ideas)?

Mostly to the “feel good” realm.

However, that’s not what the androstenone experiment is all about.

Androstenone is a very powerful, firey pheromone with some extreme upsides and downsides.

I’m hoping to “debug” it… to accentuate (or retain) most of the positives, and eliminate or reduce some of the negatives.

That’s been my blueprint with most of the “basic” pheromones. You find “debugged” rone in A314, debugged Alpha nol in [Instant Openness](https://a314.com/product/instant-openness/), etc.

> [@](#):
>
> And while I have you, your thoughts ideas on a product/combo of products that may help bring out the beast in a woman in an old & boring relationship? I think all relationships dies sooner or later, and that’s because they just become old and predictable.

Furthermore, genetics pushes us to perceive our relationships as old and boring.

Sex, whether you like it or not, is all about reproduction, even if you view it as a recreational. Recreation is but a side effect of the primary goal of reproduction, not the other way around.

Nature sets up QUITE a few boobytraps to break us apart and keep the genes spread far and wide, including a woman’s “monthly relationship destroyer” (PMS).

> [@](#):
>
> That’s when people start cheating … for some spice/a shot of drama, if you ask me.

And to spread that seed! 🙂 To encourage survival and biological diversity.

Anyway, “plain old” androstenone (found in Turn Up The Heat, amongst other products) often adds a good deal of heat to an “old” relationship, but you sometimes have to time it well.

Long term partners usually expect you to be more of a rone man (a stable provider) than a -none man (a wham, bam, thank you man, sperm donator)… so you have to introduce it cautiously, preferably near her ovulation.

IFM helps SOME people to rekindle a sexual flame, too, but this effect isn’t as predictable as are it’s relaxation effects upon women. Also, it can have adverse effects on your own mental state – an unwanted mellowing, if nothing else.

Shine is a safe route, and should definitely rekindle some flame. At least the cuddlt, affectionate type.

TAF is experimental, but seems to play the role of a “second look” pheromone in some cases. Shuts down the brain’s filters, hotwires the Reticular Acviating System (the RAS), and allows people to look at things or people like they were looking at them for the very first time… valuable in some contexts… including this one.

If you ever have relationships problems OTHER than sex, A314 is good. I’ve gotten reports of it saving marriages (but NOT turning up the heat in bed). Fulfills a strong, personal “hero” role.

> [@](#):
>
> Thanks for the quick response earlier.

You’re welcome. 🙂

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/6-pack-thread-the-great-androstenone-experiment-parts-1-2/189)._
