# A314 realization **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [March 23, 2007, 6:26am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-realization/2670 "2007-03-23T06:26:13Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 17
**Author:** ![Socrates](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/3bc359/32.png) [@Socrates](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Socrates)\ **Post date:** [March 24, 2007, 1:02am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-realization/2670/17 "2007-03-24T01:02:27Z")
A314 definitely has a little amount of Androste **none** in there but is predominantly Androste **rone** with a number of other components (the latest version includes a total of 16 pheromones I do believe). Michael Harris from Androtics has posted on the problems of using -Rone alone and why a little -None needs to be added to it (see below)… > [@Evolutionary psychology: -Rone men and -None Men](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/evolutionary-psychology-rone-men-and-none-men/19/7): > > I know what you mean. Rone by itself has some serious issues. I tried more closely to formulate the new A314 to the James Bond character (I’m sure it was in the back of my mind previously, too). The experimental mix that ended up being A314, the one that “made it” in the tests, was based along the lines of something like a transmogrification of 80/20 principle… except the 80% part really does do something. The 20% wouldn’t exist as effectively without the 80%. Nonetheless, that 80% part is sa… MHarris: "I know what you mean. Androsterone by itself has some serious issues. I tried more closely to formulate the new A314 to the James Bond character (I’m sure it was in the back of my mind previously, too). The experimental mix that ended up being A314, the one that “made it” in the tests, was based along the lines of something like a transmogrification of 80/20 principle… except the 80% part really does do something. The 20% wouldn’t exist as effectively without the 80%. Nonetheless, that 80% [Androsterone] part is safe, perhaps too safe. That’s where the other 20% comes in to play, and IMHO, is essential. I would never use Androsterone completely alone. It has some serious downsides. I’ve never liked the effects I’ve gotten from wearing Androsterone alone…" > [@MX102 experimental A314 mix 1: early user experiences, no effect yet, dosing tips](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-experimental-a314-mix-1/521/29): > > Androstenol not being sexual, depends on how you look at it. I think it is “indirectly” sexual. For instance, ANY pheromone is the end result of hormone metabolism. Therefore, ANY pheromone acts as an exogenous marker of hormone metabolism. i.e., the more pheromones you use, of any kind, the more you’re saying to other people “hey, my body makes lots of hormones” That is indirectly sexual, as it indicates good health, and good health as indicated by hormone and pheromone output often goes h… MHarris: “…A314 is highly refined -rone] that doesn’t put out the “Walk all over Me, I’m Mr. Rogers” type prescence that Androsterone alone can sometimes do on some men.” --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-realization/2670)._