# a314 rev 24 P90E pseudojournal

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-rev-24-p90e-pseudojournal/38638>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [May 16, 2010, 5:19am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-rev-24-p90e-pseudojournal/38638 "2010-05-16T05:19:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sillykitty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/sillykitty/32/1574_2.png) [@Sillykitty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Sillykitty)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2010, 7:02am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-rev-24-p90e-pseudojournal/38638/5 "2010-06-14T07:02:38Z")

</div>

> [@jayarea](#):
>
> is the “rodney dangerfield” effect a good or bad thing?

Read through the reports on this P90 A314 version, you’ll see. And check out Steve’s review on it, I think he’s the one that called it the “Rodney Dangerfield” effect (or something like that anyway).

Here: [A314 P90 Special Edition (Revision 24) - Rodney Dangerfield Effect](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-p90-special-edition-revision-24-rodney-dangerfield-effect/38916)

And here: [A314 Rev. 24 (P90 Edition) Blog](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-rev-24-p90-edition-blog/39174)

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-rev-24-p90e-pseudojournal/38638)._