# Adding mx297 to ij or tuth? **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [December 5, 2011, 11:00am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/adding-mx297-to-ij-or-tuth/53618 "2011-12-05T11:00:18Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![GCDOWNUNDER](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/ac8455/32.png) [@GCDOWNUNDER](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/GCDOWNUNDER)\ **Post date:** [December 5, 2011, 11:00am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/adding-mx297-to-ij-or-tuth/53618/1 "2011-12-05T11:00:18Z")
Will mx297 take away some of the aggressiveness associated with ij & tuth,say in a party or club environment,has anyone still had people wanting to fight them while wearing mx297 with either ij or tuth ---
**Author:** ![mobocaster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c2a13f/32.png) [@mobocaster](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mobocaster)\ **Post date:** [December 5, 2011, 11:12am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/adding-mx297-to-ij-or-tuth/53618/2 "2011-12-05T11:12:09Z")
I doubt [MX297](https://a314.com/product/mx297/) would make much of a dent in IJ - Its not one for subtle steering and its overt/abrasive nature and five-times anything else none content would probably require a megadose of 297 to balance it. TUTH is a different matter but my experience is that TUTH is best used to give a sexual edge to 297, so should be added-in after the 297 has done its work. And even then, you may still have problems. I’ve still had a few (mainly older) guys go agressive on me after applying TUTH/none to 297 but not nearly as many as I’ve had with IJ/other mixes. ---
**Author:** ![samuraitea](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/samuraitea/32/1998_2.png) [@samuraitea](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/samuraitea)\ **Post date:** [December 5, 2011, 1:22pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/adding-mx297-to-ij-or-tuth/53618/3 "2011-12-05T13:22:30Z")
Interesting combo… I think I may have done mx297/390 with AMMO but never with IJ or Jerk.. Me personally, I have learned to TAME Jerk, I actually have taken more aggression from AMMO alone than IJ recently. That is because I have a more polite and modest composure, the person who seems sober when f\*\*ked out of his mind… So adding some Jerk just puts my cloud into a typical college student jerk/flirt while keeping my modest-ness! mx297/390 worked really well for me, my gf loves it, most girls love it! I know some of our Pro’s here say it gives them a “Beta male” vibe, whoever, that hasn’t been applicable to me yet. I gonna agree with Mob UNTIL I test it myself, because I know what IJ CAN do, I have brought girls to tears without saying a single mean word! mx297/390 to me isn’t a social therefor not an appropriate buffer for IJ. I think if you wanted to add sex appeal to your mx297/390 go with the mx390+AMMO! That works for me every time 🙂 ~Tea ---
**Author:** ![mobocaster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c2a13f/32.png) [@mobocaster](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mobocaster)\ **Post date:** [December 5, 2011, 1:59pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/adding-mx297-to-ij-or-tuth/53618/4 "2011-12-05T13:59:12Z")
TUTH or straight none is the best sexual complement I’ve yet found with [MX297](https://a314.com/product/mx297/) - It disturbs the 297 charisma/engaging feel least. I’m not entirely convinced about Ammo - I’ve a feeling that its rone content does not sit well with 297 - Results are ok but not as good as I’ve had with TUTH/none and similarly, I had very poor results with a314 - Just seems to confuse. Esp with people who had previously responded well to either. Recently I’ve had some very promising responses to MX297/P75, especially from people who you would normally expect to do badly with high/overt none. Need to take it further though. A good while back, Steve confirmed that MX297/390 is indeed a social. Although I’d agree it is probably the pinnacle of AD’s social products just now. Saying that, any guy with good game, a decent natural none production could still do very well with it in a sexual context. I’ve also found that 297/390 can work very well with women who don’t respond to or are put-off the “high-status” thing and despite the claims of many, there are IME plenty of women who fit that bill. 🙂