# Ammo 1.5 ageing well with storage

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ammo-1-5-ageing-well-with-storage/1877>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [February 2, 2007, 12:56pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ammo-1-5-ageing-well-with-storage/1877 "2007-02-02T12:56:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mak](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/dc4da7/32.png) [@Mak](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Mak)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2007, 12:56pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ammo-1-5-ageing-well-with-storage/1877/1 "2007-02-02T12:56:33Z")

</div>

Few months back I bought and used ammo for a few weeks, then stored it well in cool dark place for a few months without further testing, then just happen to give it a go last few days.

I can tell quite clearly how there is a difference. It is not like a different product, but more like the difference between a $20 bottle of scotch, and a Dimple.

Now, with 1 & 2 sprays on skin, results are near consistant. Magnet effect for females, mostly 20+ but not exclusively, around 2 meters (6 ft) distance, with obvious cheerful, somehow suggestive, tone to the conversations.

One example:

Bank queue with 2 ammo sprays turned into a social gathering within 45 seconds; 2 women around 60 behind me (not together and behind each other) spoke to me ontop of each other’s voices nonstop, alongside the 35 yrs old woman ahead of me by one man turned around and talked another subject. Talk continued at the tellers’ window, then the 35 old one waited til I’m done to finish talking. Needless to say everyone in the small bank branch was watching such entertainment.

Saw some mellow moments from males, somehow A314-like but milder. Now that was not there few months back.

Anyone with similar experience or comments ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mercury](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e95f7d/32.png) [@mercury](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mercury)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2007, 2:56pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ammo-1-5-ageing-well-with-storage/1877/2 "2007-02-02T14:56:21Z")

</div>

is version 1.5 better than 1.0 in your opinion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mak](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/dc4da7/32.png) [@Mak](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Mak)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2007, 3:05pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ammo-1-5-ageing-well-with-storage/1877/3 "2007-02-02T15:05:00Z")

</div>

I only had 1.5, so no experience with 1.0

My guess is 1.0 did not contain TAA/IS, while 1.5 seemingly does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mercury](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e95f7d/32.png) [@mercury](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mercury)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2007, 3:24pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ammo-1-5-ageing-well-with-storage/1877/4 "2007-02-02T15:24:45Z")

</div>

it contains instant shine?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mak](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/dc4da7/32.png) [@Mak](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Mak)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2007, 3:33pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ammo-1-5-ageing-well-with-storage/1877/5 "2007-02-02T15:33:56Z")

</div>

You never heard it from me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mercury](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e95f7d/32.png) [@mercury](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mercury)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2007, 8:01am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ammo-1-5-ageing-well-with-storage/1877/6 "2007-02-03T08:01:54Z")

</div>

ok dont worry i wont tell … 😉