# Are the experimental pheromones better

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/are-the-experimental-pheromones-better/10395>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [March 25, 2008, 1:24am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/are-the-experimental-pheromones-better/10395 "2008-03-25T01:24:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/65b543/32.png) [@Clay](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Clay)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2008, 1:24am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/are-the-experimental-pheromones-better/10395/1 "2008-03-25T01:24:01Z")

</div>

I’m always seeing every one talking about the [experimental pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/product-category/advanced-pheromones/experimental-pheromones/) such as p79, TAL, and Spaceland. I was wondering if the experimental pheromones are better than the general spray pheromones such as Ammo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mockingbird](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mockingbird/32/1790_2.png) [@mockingbird](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mockingbird)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2008, 1:29am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/are-the-experimental-pheromones-better/10395/2 "2008-03-25T01:29:10Z")

</div>

In my opinion and the average opinion, no experimental is better than ammo. If you want results, stick with instant line, since experimental are not developped and is in research only.

And it takes a long time even to discover any [experimental pheromone](https://pheromonelabs.com/product-category/advanced-pheromones/experimental-pheromones/)’s effect when you are wearing it because it differs from one to another

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![renny](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/renny/32/2104_2.png) [@renny](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/renny)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2008, 12:19pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/are-the-experimental-pheromones-better/10395/3 "2008-03-25T12:19:51Z")

</div>

> [@Clay](#):
>
> I’m always seeing every one talking about the experimental pheromones such as p79, TAL, and Spaceland. I was wondering if the experimental pheromones are better than the general spray pheromones such as Ammo.

The consumer products like AMMO are tweaked out for best results. The reason you see so many posts about the others is that this forum serves two purposes. Help and support for new users is one focus. Testing things like the “P” series is another. “p” series products may not even be [pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/).

Stick with the consumer products unless you like being a guinea pig 😃 . Remember these other things can have good or bad or no effects at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lillith](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/lillith/32/2355_2.png) [@Lillith](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Lillith)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2008, 11:41pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/are-the-experimental-pheromones-better/10395/4 "2008-03-25T23:41:33Z")

</div>

You menfolk have about 16 commercial products made for you. The women have three (four if you count Instant Sexiness comes in an “A” and a “B” formula). One of the men’s products, [Instant Female Magic](https://a314.com/product/instant-female-magic/), is also offered in the pheromones for women section.

You might want to try all 16 of the commercial products for men first. The experimental and putatives don’t necessarily have sexual effects and no one is quite sure what they do, completely. They can also be expensive.