# before we move on, could we review the PUTATIVES ? **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [July 5, 2006, 5:01pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/before-we-move-on-could-we-review-the-putatives/476 "2006-07-05T17:01:40Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 62
**Author:** ![tacitus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/6a8cbe/32.png) [@tacitus](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tacitus)\ **Post date:** [July 23, 2006, 1:36pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/before-we-move-on-could-we-review-the-putatives/476/62 "2006-07-23T13:36:33Z")
P74 + EST could be too much of a good thing… the TAC may have had a stabilizing influence though… at times like these a squeech of a drying pheromone like P78 might firm things up… you might try a touch of P80 too.. it adds some basic depth to the vibe, just a hint, like you might add a bit of black walnut extract to enrich a vanilla flavor… we have so many more putatives to sort through… --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/before-we-move-on-could-we-review-the-putatives/476)._