# Catlord's Theory of Sexual Pressure **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [October 31, 2009, 9:44am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734 "2009-10-31T09:44:39Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [October 31, 2009, 9:44am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/1 "2009-10-31T09:44:39Z")
I am noticing some things that are coming out of my calculator that are intriguing. I have been trying to find a common thread in mixes that work well for specific purposes (among them, rapid sexual seduction), and this keeps coming up in the results. It seems fairly obvious, but it has profound effects. It is this: _A woman will best respond sexually to the level of pressure to sexual action that she is most comfortable with._ What this means is that, quite simply, MORE IS NOT ALWAYS BETTER. For instance, I have been working on a mix specifically designed to sexually seduce one particular woman. This woman is married and has a child, so I am not going to make or use this mix, but I am trying to find what she will respond to as part of my research. (This is one reason I love my calculator.) The results have been interesting, because three sprays of PS shows response, but alone, shows results that indicate that it gives too much sexual pressure. She is projected to ab-react, and the _reverse_ of desired effect is indicated. This level of sexual pressure therefore can be seen to have the desired effect of arousal, but takes it too far for her comfort level, given her status as a married mother, and she responds with 180 degrees from the desired results: rejection, refusal and avoidance. The Anti-Slut Defense. However, I have used the calculator to “grow” a mix that shows exactly the desired results. This mix, which I call SD-J1\*, shows a response of immediate and powerful sexual interest from her, and over the course of multiple exposures, shows a very high likelyhood that she will respond not just with arousal, but that she will react to it with enthusiastic sexual intercourse. This indication happens within a maximum of 5-6 exposures, and she is indicated to possibly even respond with multiple sexual encounters, beginning with as little as one exposure. What is even more interesting is that beyond that, indications appear to suggest she is no longer responding with sexual intercourse, but is not ab-reacting, either. Given her circumstances, and the responses she is calculated to give to almost every other mix I have tested, this woman is by all means a faithful, devoted wife and mother. No other mix or single [pheromone](https://pheromonelabs.com/) produces that specific response. They all meet with either sexual disinterest or the ASD/shutdown. Since I know that the vast majority of women in the same exposure circumstances she would be in would respond with sex when exposed to three sprays of PS-R0x, and she responds with ASD/shutdown, I know she is reacting in a way that would likely result in sex if she was not married with child. Therefore, we can presume that in this case, 3 sprays of PS-R0x is too much sexual pressure. If I add P83 to the mix, I get the same response as if I use 3 sprays of PS-R0x, only much less dramatic: she still responds, but her response is not smooth and while she may respond with sex (especially after 5-6 exposures), the whole response is less effective. Again, adding the P83 likely intrdouces too much sexual pressure. The reason that this happens this way, I believe, as a great deal to do with the woman’s consciousness of her sexual response. If it happens too fast, it triggers the ASD/shutdown. In a woman who is not involved/engaged/taken, or who does not value her marriage, this is not of as much concern because she is “allowed” to react that way more freely. However, in a woman who has the mantle of wife and/or mother, who takes her responsibilities seriously, the sexual pressure must be dialed down to just a simmer, and allowed to come to a boil more slowly so that she is not given to respond with ASD/shutdown and the pressure builds. In this scenario, she finds herself either unaware of it consciously until she is too far along to want to fight it, or she enjoys the feeling of being slowly and surely aroused until she becomes “helpless to resist”. The latter which would likely be a defense against responsibility for the sexual results. In contrast, my ex nearly always responded to me with sex when I wore 2 sprays of PS-R0x around her. Given that two sprays was determined over time to be the ideal for her genetic makeup (black), three sprays was not too much sexual pressure, but too much of a specific pheromone that is more attractive to other women than it seems to be to black women. When she was exposed to the correct dose, she almost always responded with enthusiastic arousal and sexual indulgence. The sexual pressure could be lower in part because of the fact that she was familiar with me, she had a higher than average sex drive, and she was familiar with how I could make her feel. However, when she and I began drifting apart emotionally (for us, sex had been how we bonded emotionally), it began adversely affecting the sexual response between us, and more and more sexual pressure was necessary to achieve the same result. I therefore conclude the following: 1. Accurately judging the sexual pressure it takes to cause a successful and willing transfer of sexual fluids with any given female is therefore an important consideration when that is the goal of the phero hunter. 2. Given the right combination, dosage and exposure, almost any woman can be induced to respond with an erotic arousal that she may be unable, or unwilling, to control. However, these specifics depend on her personality, body chemistry, point in cycle, social status comparative to the hunter, her moral, religious and ethical beliefs, her age, whether she has a child or not, and her level of involvement with one or more other males. 3. It is possible, though difficult, to create specific pheromone mixes that are tailored specifically to any given female to achieve the desired results in many (but not all) cases. - SD-J1 is: 3 sprays TUTH (2.5 mcg/spray of androstenone) 1 drop A314 10 mcg P96 ---
**Author:** ![LeafStamp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/leafstamp/32/376_2.png) [@LeafStamp](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/LeafStamp)\ **Post date:** [October 31, 2009, 11:33am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/2 "2009-10-31T11:33:53Z")
You really are getting into the dark arts, aren’t you? 🙂 It was, however, an interesting read. What you’re really getting into here, though, is manipulative psychology. Getting someone to be open to the concept of something that they would ordinarily refuse. But you’re using [pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/) as just another blade in the swiss-army knife of manipulation (how poetic!) - which is just what they are. I’m not judging here, just looking at things scientifically. When you take pheromones out of the equation it might help to look at it more objectively. A happily married woman and mother would most likely not go out to a club and be dancing provocatively with another man. However, she would probably be open to the concept of going to a bookclub, talking to the neighbour etc. Meaning that those are your areas of attack if you choose to seduce her. If a woman is in a book club, but also goes out dancing. It’s no guess which one you’re more rather likely to do to get into her pants. However, if it’s just a book club - that’s another story. Since it’s the only door open, you need to initiate contact there. And then, as she gets more comfortable and more open with you - you slowly turn up the heat VERY GRADUALLY until something happens. Kind of inching your way towards your goal. So for this, I will propose a formula. [http://i36.tinypic.com/1ze9vo7.jpg](http://i36.tinypic.com/1ze9vo7.jpg) Namely, Chance of succeeding is inversely proportional to the rate of change of sexuality in reference to time plus initial starting point. There will be a coeffecient of change - which is hesitance, but that will be based on the girl. If a girl likes to move fast, then she will have a higher tolerance to this change in sexuality. However, if you’ve just met a 28 year old virgin, you’re probably not going to be having sex in the next hour. You’ll need to ease her into it. Start off with kissing, move onto petting, move onto whatever until you get there. But there needs to be time involved as well, it won’t just be done in one hour. The initial starting point is also introduced. If you’ve met said virgin in a dance-club, and you’ve just dirty-danced, then you’re off to a better starting position than if you met at a book club or church. What I’m getting at here, is that your chance of succeeding needs to take into account the level of sexual activity already happening. And if a girl is more hesitant, then the rise will have to be more gradual. But if a girl is keen, you can have a very steep change in sexuality, but due to low hesitance - there will be success. IW’s will use this formula, but stick to the “play it safe” rises in sexuality. They will be hoping to not screw things up with a girl due to her being so important to them that they will increase the sexuality incredibly slowly at a rate that is successful. But they will be moving up too slowly to do anything. The “frog in a heating pot” scenario. I’m sure there’s some common-ground covered here by what you’ve just said. It’s the engineer in me. I like graphs and formulas 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [October 31, 2009, 11:50am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/3 "2009-10-31T11:50:15Z")
Leafstamp, as I understand things, we’re basically saying the same thing, just in different ways. As to manipulative psychology, I’m aware of that, and that is why I use calculations to do these experiments, instead of acting them out. I’m interested in understanding the triggers and responses to those triggers so I can get a better understanding of what is common and what is individual in the responses of people to various stimuli. Sex just happens to fascinate me as a subject of study, especially female sexuality, even when (as now) I have neither intent nor interest in making something happen. I do not advocate using this information to seduce women against their will, nor to disrupt marriages nor break up happy homes. I’m simply studying the responses of a woman who is married and has child, principally because she is married and has child: she will react differently than most other subjects would. She has the social strictures and expectations and greater potential losses to deal with. Gathering this information gives me a better understanding of how women in general respond under different specific situations, and what they will do when the proper triggers are activated. It helps make my [pheromone formulas](https://pheromonelabs.com/shop/) better because I can better craft them towards the goal with better understanding of when, where and why they may fail. ---
**Author:** ![LeafStamp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/leafstamp/32/376_2.png) [@LeafStamp](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/LeafStamp)\ **Post date:** [October 31, 2009, 11:51am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/4 "2009-10-31T11:51:35Z")
That Startinglevel variable should probably be changed to Previouslevel. As starting level doesn’t come into it a month down the line. Whoops :S ---
**Author:** ![K-Train](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/k-train/32/2253_2.png) [@K-Train](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/K-Train)\ **Post date:** [October 31, 2009, 1:46pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/5 "2009-10-31T13:46:00Z")
Catlord, have you tried adding TAC to the mix? I’ve heard that it’s an _excellent_ comfort phero and that it causes POWERFULL orgasms. Have you seen either of these effects? ---
**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\ **Post date:** [October 31, 2009, 4:54pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/6 "2009-10-31T16:54:10Z")
> [@K-Train](#): > > Catlord, have you tried adding TAC to the mix? I’ve **heard** that it’s an _excellent_ comfort phero and that **it causes POWERFULL orgasms**. Have you seen either of these effects? Have you tested that out, K? Tis not good to spread rumors. 😃 ---
**Author:** ![K-Train](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/k-train/32/2253_2.png) [@K-Train](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/K-Train)\ **Post date:** [October 31, 2009, 7:27pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/7 "2009-10-31T19:27:03Z")
> [@M\_M](#): > > Have you tested that out, K? Tis not good to spread rumors. 😃 ROFL, M&M is that you again?😛🙄😃 Unfortuantely M&M I HAVEN’T tested this theory out, which is why I hoped Catlord did. Of course, the key word is **heard** , meaning I’m not COMPLETELY sure. But you’re right, we don’t want men buying boatloads of TAC to try to make their women levitate off the bed due to powerfull orgasms that I haven’t tested.😮 BUT, I heard this info from a woman, and it came from right here:[Revisiting TAC - and the explosive, prolonged orgasm](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/revisiting-tac-and-the-explosive-prolonged-orgasm/30126) Right now I definitely have some willing ladies that wouldn’t mind testing this “theory” but then what kind of guy would I be if I did that?🆒 ---
**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\ **Post date:** [October 31, 2009, 11:42pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/8 "2009-10-31T23:42:34Z")
> [@K-Train](#): > > ROFL, M&M is that you again?😛🙄😃 BOOOOOOOO! > [@K-Train](#): > > BUT, I heard this info from a woman, and it came from right here:[https://pheromonetalk.com/t/revisiting-tac-and-the-explosive-prolonged-orgasm/30126](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/revisiting-tac-and-the-explosive-prolonged-orgasm/30126) Well, IF it came from a girlllllllll! 😉 But then again, some animals need an excuse to really let loose. 😃 _ **“It was the TAC, baby! It was the TAC!”** _ Your pointing at Diane’s post is most appreciaNated!!! Thumbs up! With a clean thumb nail!! There suppose to be a certain color of light bulb that suppose to help intensify a woman’s orgasm as well. Now, IF you hear what that color is … p’wease let me know!!! 😮 No, it’s not red. > [@K-Train](#): > > Right now I definitely have some willing ladies that wouldn’t mind testing this “theory” **but then what kind of guy would I be if I did that?** 🆒 Cum on, K! _ **“IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE!”** _ 😉 **P.S.** Trick-or-Treeeeeeeeeeat! ---
**Author:** ![K-Train](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/k-train/32/2253_2.png) [@K-Train](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/K-Train)\ **Post date:** [November 1, 2009, 12:04am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/9 "2009-11-01T00:04:32Z")
> [@M\_M](#): > > BOOOOOOOO! > > Well, IF it came from a girlllllllll! 😉 But then again, some animals need an excuse to really let loose. 😃 _ **“It was the TAC, baby! It was the TAC!”** _ > > Your pointing at Diane’s post is most appreciaNated!!! Thumbs up! With a clean thumb nail!! > > There suppose to be a certain color of light bulb that suppose to help intensify a woman’s orgasm as well. Now, IF you hear what that color is … p’wease let me know!!! 😮 No, it’s not red. > > Cum on, K! _ **“IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE!”** _ 😉 > > **P.S.** Trick-or-Treeeeeeeeeeat! Well today I had some VERY interesting hits off MX302(AKA THE SHIZZAT) and I may have _another_ interested participant. Oh, how they how flock…😃 Also, maybe this color that increases orgasms is dark? After all, the freaks do come out at night.🆒😮😛 ---
**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\ **Post date:** [November 1, 2009, 12:07am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/10 "2009-11-01T00:07:31Z")
> [@K-Train](#): > > Well today I had some VERY interesting hits off MX302(AKA THE SHIZZAT) and I may have _another_ interested participant. Oh, how they how flock…😃 > > Also, maybe this color that increases orgasms is dark? After all, the freaks do come out at night.🆒😮😛 Will be keeping an eye out for your MX302 thread, K! 😉 Hope she wasn’t a 600 pounder! 😃 ---
**Author:** ![LeafStamp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/leafstamp/32/376_2.png) [@LeafStamp](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/LeafStamp)\ **Post date:** [November 1, 2009, 12:07am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/11 "2009-11-01T00:07:38Z")
> [@M\_M](#): > > There suppose to be a certain color of light bulb that suppose to help intensify a woman’s orgasm as well. Now, IF you hear what that color is … p’wease let me know!!! 😮 No, it’s not red. I heard that it’s the same colour as the business-end of a blindfold. I don’t think they make lightbulbs in that colour… ---
**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\ **Post date:** [November 1, 2009, 12:10am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/12 "2009-11-01T00:10:19Z")
> [@LeafStamp](#): > > I heard that it’s the same colour as the business-end of a blindfold. > > I don’t think they make lightbulbs in that colour… No, there’s suppose to be a color, seriously. I’d place my bet on pink, but I haven’t found the answer. And I’m not buying the book!! 🙄 ---
**Author:** ![evolver](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/evolver/32/1896_2.png) [@evolver](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/evolver)\ **Post date:** [November 1, 2009, 12:18am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/13 "2009-11-01T00:18:58Z")
To stay on topic … This thread is incredible. I am intrigued by this calculator and it’s potential. I am also fascinated by the biological part of our sexual natures, what drives this seemingly mechanical desire. Turns the crank, shifts the gears and lubes the pistons. 😃 Having just read [Sperm Wars by Robin Baker](http://amzn.com/1560258489), I am fascinated by these processes. And I get laid along the way. Reading that book was a revelation!!! > [@](#): > > A woman will best respond sexually to the level of pressure to sexual action that she is most comfortable with. This could relate to the Mystery Method model of Attraction -\> Comfort -\> Seduction. Which I have been using (with subconscious competence) for quite some time. ---
**Author:** ![Alfa1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a183cd/32.png) [@Alfa1](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Alfa1)\ **Post date:** [November 1, 2009, 10:55am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/14 "2009-11-01T10:55:22Z")
> [@M\_M](#): > > No, there’s suppose to be a color, seriously. I’d place my bet on pink, but I haven’t found the answer. And I’m not buying the book!! 🙄 I suspect it would be Monochromatic UV light (360nm; half bandwidth, 8.8nm) this has been shown to suppress pineal melatonin release in rats and to induce phase shift in circadian rhythms. An excerpt from Wikipedia: In animals, the pineal gland appears to play a major role in sexual development, hibernation, metabolism, and seasonal breeding. This is a huge topic and goes into hormones released in the brain for sleep mainly but also serotonin - the happy neurotransmitter…. Huge subject….! Tons of stuff on the web about this if you want to do some digging ---
**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\ **Post date:** [November 1, 2009, 5:45pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/15 "2009-11-01T17:45:23Z")
> [@Alfa1](#): > > I suspect it would be Monochromatic UV light (360nm; half bandwidth, 8.8nm) this has been shown to suppress pineal melatonin release in rats and to induce phase shift in circadian rhythms. I wish I knew! 🆒 Anyone here owns **500 Lovemaking Tips and Secrets**? If so, would you give up the answer p’wease? ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [November 1, 2009, 11:51pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/16 "2009-11-01T23:51:43Z")
As I recall… faintly… that color light was amber. Or orange… one of the two. It’s in a post by Tacitus somewhere, if someone cares to search. I have not tried adding TAC to the stated mix. I haven’t even tried the stated mix; I don’t have any intention of bedding said young nubile and married female. Oh, if only she were single. But Homie don’t play dat. This mix was “grown” for research purposes only, although I suspect it would work well on other females also. This one is a cross between Irish and Portuguese. ---
**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 12:29am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/17 "2009-11-02T00:29:09Z")
> [@catlord17](#): > > As I recall… faintly… that color light was amber. Or orange… one of the two. It’s in a post by Tacitus somewhere, if someone cares to search. > > I have not tried adding TAC to the stated mix. **I haven’t even tried the stated mix; I don’t have any intention of bedding said young nubile and married female.** Oh, if only she were single. But Homie don’t play dat. This mix was “grown” for research purposes only, although I suspect it would work well on other females also. This one is a cross between Irish and Portuguese. Say huh! You haven’t even tried it!? Come on, Lordy! For the sake of science. What ever happened to **Catch and Release**? That can be done without bedding. 😉 ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 1:34am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/18 "2009-11-02T01:34:03Z")
> [@M\_M](#): > > Say huh! You haven’t even tried it!? Come on, Lordy! For the sake of science. What ever happened to **Catch and Release**? That can be done without bedding. 😉 Catch and release a married woman? No thank you. I have had enough gun-in-face experiences over married women, thanks. One was more than enough. I _learn_ from my mistakes. (Usually. 🙄 ) As for trying it… not necessary, given the accuracy of the calculator on it’s results. It allows me to test mixes without using them, which is extremely useful, and saves me a lot of wasted pheromones. But usually I don’t grow a mix just to do calculated results observation. I only did it this time because I don’t care to get shot by Mr. Husband, or tear a family apart. Kidling doesn’t deserve that either. ---
**Author:** ![mikotorocks714](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikotorocks714/32/1509_2.png) [@mikotorocks714](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mikotorocks714)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 9:53am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/19 "2009-11-02T09:53:27Z")
Good to hear you have morals cat. Kudos to you, now I say how about your Superman mix or your very own version of my Big Balls A’ Plenty mix you were curious on making? Now that I’d love to see! > [@catlord17](#): > > Catch and release a married woman? No thank you. I have had enough gun-in-face experiences over married women, thanks. One was more than enough. I _learn_ from my mistakes. (Usually. 🙄 ) > > As for trying it… not necessary, given the accuracy of the calculator on it’s results. It allows me to test mixes without using them, which is extremely useful, and saves me a lot of wasted pheromones. But usually I don’t grow a mix just to do calculated results observation. I only did it this time because I don’t care to get shot by Mr. Husband, or tear a family apart. Kidling doesn’t deserve that either. ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 10:39am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/20 "2009-11-02T10:39:43Z")
> [@mikotorocks714](#): > > Good to hear you have morals cat. Kudos to you, now I say how about your Superman mix or your very own version of my Big Balls A’ Plenty mix you were curious on making? Now that I’d love to see! I try to follow the negative golden rule: Do not do unto others as you would have them not do unto you. The Superman Mix is in the works. I just have a lot of irons in the fire at the moment. I was also trying to build one specifically for natural redheaded women to be attracted, but even my best efforts seem to be indicating that there is not enough genetic diversity there to be very specific to them. [Next page](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734.md?page=2)