# Catlord's Theory of Sexual Pressure **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [October 31, 2009, 9:44am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734 "2009-10-31T09:44:39Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 3:35pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/21 "2009-11-02T15:35:17Z")
> [@K-Train](#): > > Catlord, have you tried adding TAC to the mix? I’ve heard that it’s an _excellent_ comfort phero and that it causes POWERFULL orgasms. Have you seen either of these effects? I did calculations for 10, 20, 30 and 40 mcg of TAC added to that mix and from 2 exposures to 24 exposures. TAC appears to significantly reduce the effectiveness of the original mix toward sex with this subject, and in only one case was sex indicated with enough certainty to say it was going to happen, and then only once, and after 8+ exposures. Testing for 15, 25, 35 and 45 mcg TAC in the mix showed no significant sexual results. Testing for 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 mcg shows a good response at 7.5 mcg, with sex indicated after at least 8 exposures, and possibly again after another 16 to 20 more. The indications between them appear to indicate that there is a dampening effect from the TAC that produces a more loving response than sexual response, which allows her to become frightened by the sex and withdraw from repeating it, and even when there is strong attraction and intimacy later on, she prefers loving togetherness to sex. In this case, I would say TAC is not indicated for focusing on a sexual response. ---
**Author:** ![WildFlower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/wildflower/32/1260_2.png) [@WildFlower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/WildFlower)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 4:21pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/22 "2009-11-02T16:21:07Z")
> [@](#): > > The indications between them appear to indicate that there is a dampening effect from the TAC that produces a more loving response than sexual response This is congruent with what I’ve found from TAC. TAC definitely has a dampening, buffering effect on anone, which prevents the anone from hitting hard and instantly, but in turn creates that ‘simmering’ quality you referred to. In a mix which is already sufficiently buffered, TAC is counter productive. But when TAC is used as the primary anone buffer the slow, ever increasing desire and arousal is amazing. It has lead to sex for me, and I could see it leading to sex in many different circumstances (although I realise this situation is different, and the thread is about the best mix for the particular situation) This calculator still fascinates and baffles me. ---
**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 5:16pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/23 "2009-11-02T17:16:02Z")
> [@WildFlower](#): > > This is congruent with what I’ve found from TAC. TAC definitely has a dampening, buffering effect on anone, which prevents the anone from hitting hard and instantly, but in turn creates that ‘simmering’ quality you referred to. In a mix which is already sufficiently buffered, TAC is counter productive. But when TAC is used as the primary anone buffer the slow, ever increasing desire and arousal is amazing. It has lead to sex for me, and I could see it leading to sex in many different circumstances (although I realise this situation is different, and the thread is about the best mix for the particular situation) > > This calculator still fascinates and baffles me. Would I be shoved in the HE DOESN’T KNOW WHAT HE’S TALKING ABOUT column, if I say that it sounds like TAC is best served as a buffer, OR! like TUTH, just before/when you know … the clothes starts to/are going to be shedding? Lordy, if I may, what would 20 mcgs of P96 do to the SD-J1 mix; and with how many exposures? If your work turns out to be true … you’re way ahead of the crowd, ‘IF’ you’d ask me! How I appreciate your sharing!!! ---
**Author:** ![K-Train](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/k-train/32/2253_2.png) [@K-Train](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/K-Train)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 5:42pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/24 "2009-11-02T17:42:44Z")
Darn…I was hoping TAC would be a good orgasm inducer…☹ Oh well, I’m still glad I purchased it, I’ll just need to be more selective about when/ where I wear it. Thanks for checking into that Catlord, much appreciated!😃 Wildflower, how about your experience with TAC? Were the orgasms so powerful she was howling like a wolf?😛 ---
**Author:** ![evolver](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/evolver/32/1896_2.png) [@evolver](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/evolver)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 6:01pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/25 "2009-11-02T18:01:48Z")
I think you got TAC confused with TAF K-Train!!! Look up reports on TAF, it’s very sensual and seductive. ---
**Author:** ![K-Train](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/k-train/32/2253_2.png) [@K-Train](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/K-Train)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 6:18pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/26 "2009-11-02T18:18:52Z")
> [@evolver](#): > > I think you got TAC confused with TAF K-Train!!! > Look up reports on TAF, it’s very sensual and seductive. Damn evolver you’re probably right!!!:o TAC…TAF…TAK… they sound so much alike! ROFL, time to hit the search button again!!!😃 ---
**Author:** ![mikotorocks714](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikotorocks714/32/1509_2.png) [@mikotorocks714](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mikotorocks714)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 6:22pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/27 "2009-11-02T18:22:54Z")
Ah, you must love red heads. Does the carpet have to match the drapes? 🙂 > [@catlord17](#): > > I try to follow the negative golden rule: Do not do unto others as you would have them not do unto you. > > The Superman Mix is in the works. I just have a lot of irons in the fire at the moment. I was also trying to build one specifically for natural redheaded women to be attracted, but even my best efforts seem to be indicating that there is not enough genetic diversity there to be very specific to them. ---
**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 6:43pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/28 "2009-11-02T18:43:33Z")
> [@mikotorocks714](#): > > Ah, you must love red heads. Does the carpet have to match the drapes? 🙂 If it didn’t, that would be considered a instant/home made/counterfeit red head, wouldn’t it? Just add water and stir. 🙄 ---
**Author:** ![mikotorocks714](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikotorocks714/32/1509_2.png) [@mikotorocks714](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mikotorocks714)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 6:47pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/29 "2009-11-02T18:47:16Z")
Sounds good to me either way! > [@M\_M](#): > > If it didn’t, that would be considered a instant/home made/counterfeit red head, wouldn’t it? Just add water and stir. 🙄 ---
**Author:** ![Reclipse](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/reclipse/32/773_2.png) [@Reclipse](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Reclipse)\ **Post date:** [November 2, 2009, 8:09pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/30 "2009-11-02T20:09:01Z")
Interesting read. Thanks for the input CL ---
**Author:** ![Butcher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/f08c70/32.png) [@Butcher](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Butcher)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2009, 12:47am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/31 "2009-11-03T00:47:58Z")
> [@catlord17](#): > > _A woman will best respond sexually to the level of pressure to sexual action that she is most comfortable with._ > > What this means is that, quite simply, MORE IS NOT ALWAYS BETTER. Words of wisdom from The Guru 😉 ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 3:28pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/32 "2009-11-04T15:28:11Z")
> [@WildFlower](#): > > This is congruent with what I’ve found from TAC. TAC definitely has a dampening, buffering effect on anone, which prevents the anone from hitting hard and instantly, but in turn creates that ‘simmering’ quality you referred to. In a mix which is already sufficiently buffered, TAC is counter productive. But when TAC is used as the primary anone buffer the slow, ever increasing desire and arousal is amazing. It has lead to sex for me, and I could see it leading to sex in many different circumstances (although I realise this situation is different, and the thread is about the best mix for the particular situation) > > This calculator still fascinates and baffles me. I have been working on improving the algorithm I use to order the calculations. It seems that the best way to achieve the goal of the mix, which had escaped me until now, is to calculate for the pheromones that most affect her in the way primarily desired. For a sexual response, I’m guessing that would mean such pheromones as androsterone, androstenone, P83 and P96 would need to be calculated first. This means I have to determine a way to calculate all possible combinations and permutations, which I don’t think I’ll be able to do without figuring out how to make the calculator into a software program which uses some sort of artificial intelligence. Try as I might, I have not yet been able to figure out how to turn it into software because it is so complex for input. I’ll have to try calculating starting with androstenone and then using TAC as a primary buffer. And the calculator will fascinate and baffle you for a long time to come, rest assured. lol ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 3:34pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/33 "2009-11-04T15:34:26Z")
> [@M\_M](#): > > Would I be shoved in the HE DOESN’T KNOW WHAT HE’S TALKING ABOUT column, if I say that it sounds like TAC is best served as a buffer, OR! like TUTH, just before/when you know … the clothes starts to/are going to be shedding? > > Lordy, if I may, what would 20 mcgs of P96 do to the SD-J1 mix; and with how many exposures? If your work turns out to be true … you’re way ahead of the crowd, ‘IF’ you’d ask me! How I appreciate your sharing!!! TAC’s best uses are not necessarily indicated by a series of experiments dealing with one specific woman. But, in her case, TAC dampens the urge to merge to such a degree (the way I calculated it) that it virtually negates the sex response. Adding 20 mcg P96 instead of 10 gives an indicator of interest and attention, but seems to indicate a more emotional attraction than sexual overall, with sex being positively indicated at between 20 and 24 total exposures. ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 3:35pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/34 "2009-11-04T15:35:55Z")
> [@K-Train](#): > > Darn…I was hoping TAC would be a good orgasm inducer…☹ > > Oh well, I’m still glad I purchased it, I’ll just need to be more selective about when/ where I wear it. > > Thanks for checking into that Catlord, much appreciated!😃 > > Wildflower, how about your experience with TAC? Were the orgasms so powerful she was howling like a wolf?😛 Non-sequitur. My calculations are for determining her sexual response specifically in regard to her having sex with me under these circumstances. They do not delve into whether she has an orgasm, or why, or if it is enhanced thereby. ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 3:41pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/35 "2009-11-04T15:41:32Z")
> [@mikotorocks714](#): > > Ah, you must love red heads. Does the carpet have to match the drapes? 🙂 I have said it many times before, I have an unexplainable, uncontrollable attraction to genuine natural redheads, but not all of them. It depends on more than just hair and skin color. Personality plays a big role too; for instance, a stunningly beautiful natural redheaded sex goddess might be crossed off my list because she is a control freak, primadonna, abusive, stupid, etc. One of my female friends is ideal in regard to her red hair: perfect shade, type and length. But I would never date her because she’s controlling, and wants to be treated like a princess all the time. I wouldn’t put up with her BS for five seconds if we were trying to be more than friends, and red carpet nymphomaniac or not, I have zero desire to inseminate this woman. Another example was a woman who was absolutely perfect except she was about as intelligent as your average parakeet. Looking back, I sometimes wonder if maybe that wouldn’t have been a bonus, and then I remember that no, it wouldn’t have. I need an intelligent woman. As for carpet matching drapes, I have met natural redheads whose carpet does not… and I don’t refuse to date her because of that… but it’s a lot more fitting of my ideal if it does. ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 3:46pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/36 "2009-11-04T15:46:48Z")
> [@mikotorocks714](#): > > Sounds good to me either way! You have outed yourself! No true red-o-phile would ever say that! lol All women have a vagina. Not all women have pale skin, freckles, and all that passion. There’s something strangely satisfying about standing there while a redhead breathes fire at you, and after she’s done and you’re glowing red hot from it, telling her she makes you hot. lol Or tackling her and wrestling for a while. Either or. 😉 ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 3:50pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/37 "2009-11-04T15:50:18Z")
Catlord’s Theory of Sexual Pressure, Part 2 Further observation and experimentation appears to reveal that in some cases, a woman may be affected positively and resist completely without apparent reaction or ab-reaction, for as long as she can, before the result is a backlash effect, during which time she indulges herself completely and without any resistance at all. I have not seen this indicated very often, but it is significant, and I theorize that this will be a case in which the stimulus may be too much sexual pressure to be ideal, but not to a significant degree. ---
**Author:** ![AJ69](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/aj69/32/284_2.png) [@AJ69](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/AJ69)\ **Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 5:53pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/38 "2009-11-04T17:53:36Z")
> [@K-Train](#): > > ROFL, M&M is that you again?😛🙄😃 > > Unfortuantely M&M I HAVEN’T tested this theory out, which is why I hoped Catlord did. Of course, the key word is **heard** , meaning I’m not COMPLETELY sure. But you’re right, we don’t want men buying boatloads of TAC to try to make their women levitate off the bed due to powerfull orgasms that I haven’t tested.😮 > > BUT, I heard this info from a woman, and it came from right here:[Revisiting TAC - and the explosive, prolonged orgasm](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/revisiting-tac-and-the-explosive-prolonged-orgasm/30126) > > Right now I definitely have some willing ladies that wouldn’t mind testing this “theory” but then what kind of guy would I be if I did that?🆒 the person who posted about the explosive orgasms… her tag by her name says “Commercial Spammer - Banned” so how reliable is that? AJ69 ---
**Author:** ![mikotorocks714](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikotorocks714/32/1509_2.png) [@mikotorocks714](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mikotorocks714)\ **Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 5:59pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/39 "2009-11-04T17:59:53Z")
Ha, ha yeah. You know for some strange reason I always thought Lindsay Lohan was kind of hot with her freckles and all, but her personality and shit she’s been through kills it so I hear you on the attraction for a certain red-o-phile being there but then being dampened by shit like that. Bleh. > [@catlord17](#): > > You have outed yourself! No true red-o-phile would ever say that! lol > > All women have a vagina. Not all women have pale skin, freckles, and all that passion. There’s something strangely satisfying about standing there while a redhead breathes fire at you, and after she’s done and you’re glowing red hot from it, telling her she makes you hot. lol Or tackling her and wrestling for a while. Either or. 😉 ---
**Author:** ![jayarea](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/48db29/32.png) [@jayarea](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jayarea)\ **Post date:** [November 4, 2009, 6:37pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734/40 "2009-11-04T18:37:15Z")
> [@AJ69](#): > > the person who posted about the explosive orgasms… her tag by her name says > > “Commercial Spammer - Banned” > > so how reliable is that? > > AJ69 very long story regarding some product issues. that doesn’t affect her quality of information though, as diane really knew her stuff. [Previous page](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734.md?page=1) [Next page](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/catlords-theory-of-sexual-pressure/33734.md?page=3)