# Copulins and Virgins

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/copulins-and-virgins/63147>\
**Category:** Lounge\
**Created:** [November 3, 2014, 12:03pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/copulins-and-virgins/63147 "2014-11-03T12:03:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miss\_Dragon](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/miss_dragon/32/866_2.png) [@Miss\_Dragon](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Miss_Dragon)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2014, 12:03pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/copulins-and-virgins/63147/1 "2014-11-03T12:03:43Z")

</div>

I decided to post this in the lounge because copulins are not actually [pheromones](https://a314.com/shop/).

I recall hearing at some point that copulins (either synthetically worn, or naturally produced) are ineffective when the target male happens to be a virgin. I think the justification was that the experience of sex is what teaches the male’s senses that copulins are sexual. He then associates the smell with the memory. If he did not have the knowledge of how to associate the smell, then encountering it would not trigger an arousal response in him.

Does anyone have any experiences or science to respond to this claim? Could the sensing of cops trigger an innate biological response, regardless of sexual experience?