# Do these pheros look legit?

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/do-these-pheros-look-legit/22242>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [October 29, 2008, 11:37pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/do-these-pheros-look-legit/22242 "2008-10-29T23:37:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bosshank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/91b2a8/32.png) [@bosshank](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/bosshank)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 5:12am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/do-these-pheros-look-legit/22242/25 "2008-11-06T05:12:58Z")

</div>

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> Sex does sell, and non-sexual pheromones actually don’t sell to the mass market at all. Most people have been programmed to think that sex = pheromones, so if you mention the actual reality of pheromones, you’re viewed as a weirdo or nut.
> 
> A real shame, too, since A314 and Instant Honesty are probably some of the most interesting pheromones out there in terms of other-than-directly-sexual benefits.
> 
> So, yes, we’ll make Ammo or anything else mass market as sexy as we can, and only talk about in sexy terms. As sexy as we can, that is, without polluting.
> 
> There’s a lot of alternate technology out there other than none (p83, p93, etc.), and you can have some -none but still balance it out w/other things.

Agree completely. I often tell guys to not underestimate the power of the social products especially in the romance realm.

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> I don’t want to come off as an overly conservative librarian type here,

No worries there dear … lol.

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> but there’s a lot of alternate technology out there other than none (p83, p93, etc.). You can also have some -none but still balance it out w/other things. Like all of the traditional mixes that use a little -none and a lot of alpha nol. Something like that, but updated, wouldn’t be so bad for sexual effects. Would it? It’s sort of a classic, I think.

I seem to do better with beta nol … what are your experiences with that?

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> Even if we focus mostly on sexual benefits, we still want to make our primary mass market product a “life safe” product. We really feel that’s our responsibility.

Agree - a very good idea.

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> Not only do more people wear Axe, but more people abuse Axe, wearing 20 to 50 sprays.

That’s because most of them are 14 … lol.

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> Where’s River’s trick, btw?

> [@Have you ever been affected by pheromones?](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/have-you-ever-been-affected-by-pheromones/22501/4):
>
> LOL! I analyze EVERYTHING too! Can’t help it…nature of the beast, I guess!wink

Curiouschic talks about doing it in her journal also …

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/do-these-pheros-look-legit/22242)._
