# Do you want the Chemical Romance Pack to be back in stock?

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/do-you-want-the-chemical-romance-pack-to-be-back-in-stock/189869>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [January 20, 2009, 10:52am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/do-you-want-the-chemical-romance-pack-to-be-back-in-stock/189869 "2009-01-20T10:52:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 23

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jessejester](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jessejester/32/1683_2.png) [@jessejester](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jessejester)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2009, 4:12pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/do-you-want-the-chemical-romance-pack-to-be-back-in-stock/189869/23 "2009-03-16T16:12:21Z")

</div>

Hey guys. After seeing this I gave up hope that these 2 mixes would come back. When I first joined the forum I did alot of research, and read alot of the journals and hoped these 2 may come back. I brought it up in Marty’s Musings on MX292 thread. Heres how it went.

> [@Musings on MX292](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/musings-on-mx292/25981/39):
>
> I will keep writing reports on it as long as I can keep getting my hands on it.
> 
> There were a couple promising ones I tried (and wrote a few reports about) that went out of stock before I got a chance to give a second bottle a whirl. Often it seems to take more than a single to-go bottle to really get a good grasp on it. If I go dig up which ones I thought had some potential, can I get you to consider giving them a second chance? :o  
> Right now we seem to have a good group of people who are actively writing reviews, so it might be worth looking into. (:

> [@Musings on MX292](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/musings-on-mx292/25981/40):
>
> Sure, I’ll consider it. As long as we have everything in stock for them.
> 
> If they’re old enough, we might even need to recissate an old computer system to read the format they’re in. Even with newer ones, some might need to be remade, or modified with what we currently carry

> [@Musings on MX292](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/musings-on-mx292/25981/49):
>
> If this is the spot where we suggest bringing back old mixes… My first 3 weeks after joining the forum all I did was read, read, read. Mostly old stuff to try to get a little education. I can remember reading very good things about MX149, and MX150. I can remember being dissapointed that I would not be able to try them. So my suggestion woulld be those 2. I would love the chance to test them.

> [@Musings on MX292](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/musings-on-mx292/25981/50):
>
> Those are a little more difficult, since they’re dependent on some things we no longer carry or make the same way.
> 
> We can make new MXs inspired by those, though.
> 
> What did you read about each that appealed to you?

> [@Musings on MX292](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/musings-on-mx292/25981/51):
>
> It is really hard to remember since its been some time since I have read all that, but… I never remember reading a bad review on either of them, and the experienced users raved about them. I’m pretty sure I remember reading MX150 as being very consistant at low dosage. It had a flirty attraction, high comfort level, low resistance, and highly seductive with a cool pua type of self effect. I could be wrong.

So, my questions are:

1. What do you think it is that they no longer carry/make the same way?

2. Would it be possible to mock these mixes without it?

3. Is there actually a chance of them coming back?

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/do-you-want-the-chemical-romance-pack-to-be-back-in-stock/189869)._