# faith? science? aspies?

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/faith-science-aspies/53561>\
**Category:** Pheromone Theory & Molecules\
**Created:** [December 1, 2011, 12:06am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/faith-science-aspies/53561 "2011-12-01T00:06:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nihillusion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/8edcca/32.png) [@Nihillusion](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Nihillusion)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2011, 12:06am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/faith-science-aspies/53561/1 "2011-12-01T00:06:15Z")

</div>

Okay, so I’m told that our goodies are on the way - and in almost the same breath, told that there is no solid scientific research showing anything conclusive on the effects of pheromones on humans.

The irony of hearing how [pheromone product](https://a314.com/shop/) users gain their benefits from faith only, from the same mouth that introduced us to here, made me chuckle on the inside…😛 but the research thing kinda bummed me a bit.☹

Is it true? If so, howcome? Surely if some formulas have a “in-your-face” effect, there would be some scientific proof by now.😕

Another thing - the friend above is an “aspie” - could this be a factor in how unaffected he is by pheromones?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tisha23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@tisha23](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tisha23)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2011, 1:46am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/faith-science-aspies/53561/2 "2011-12-01T01:46:14Z")

</div>

Who told you there is no solid scientific research on [pheromones](https://a314.com/shop/) ? There is a whole studies and abstract section on it. There are countless studies in Pub Med and other medical journals. Yes pheromone communication is still in its infancy but many compounds have shown pheromone responses and tests have been repeatable and consistent.

However, You have to remember emotions are hard to measure and if science cant measure something and label it they have a hard time proving it. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen or exist.

Yawning for instance. Science has no ideal why we do it or what purpose it serves. Its a function our bodies do however. The only difference is you can see a yawn. You cant deny its existence.

Blushing is another thing science cant explain.

They have theories of course but they are unproven. These functions are probably connected to emotion which is unmeasurable.

As for asperger’s syndrome… there are some users who have this condition and the effects of mones on them is touch and go. By the way aspergers is another human condition involving emotion that science cant prove or find causation for. But we know it exists dont we ?

"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted.” Albert Einstein. 😉

Tisha

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nihillusion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/8edcca/32.png) [@Nihillusion](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Nihillusion)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2011, 1:50am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/faith-science-aspies/53561/3 "2011-12-01T01:50:57Z")

</div>

Thanks, feel better now 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Radix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/d9b06d/32.png) [@Radix](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Radix)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2012, 12:47am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/faith-science-aspies/53561/4 "2012-01-07T00:47:24Z")

</div>

Aspies are logical creatures. I know, I am one. The fact that he dismissed an entire science while communicating incorrect supporting documentation/facts would cause me hesitance.

I’m by no means an expert on much at all, but when I do make a statement it’s based not just on my experience but upon the experience of others as well as sound theory. If I’m just straight up wrong about something because I have bad information it’s generally not offensive to me, it’s an opportunity to dive back in and assimilate more correct information. Aspies crave input. Which is why the dismissal of an additional form of physical/psychological “input” is rather confusing to me in this case.

/salute

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scatterp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/3bc359/32.png) [@scatterp](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/scatterp)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2012, 12:10pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/faith-science-aspies/53561/5 "2012-05-13T12:10:57Z")

</div>

aspergers is rated on the aq scale of 1 - 50 where 50 is the worst cases. I score 47 and mones work fine its quite simple “attraction is not a choice” said another way there either is or isnt chemistry … a314 is that chemistry in a bottle … how ever you do need to get some other stuff down or it wont work
