# How do you think A Woman Should Be Treated? **URL:** \ **Category:** Lounge\ **Created:** [June 6, 2007, 4:51am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/how-do-you-think-a-woman-should-be-treated/4005 "2007-06-06T04:51:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 55
**Author:** ![PheroQuirk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9e8a1a/32.png) [@PheroQuirk](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/PheroQuirk)\ **Post date:** [June 10, 2007, 9:11pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/how-do-you-think-a-woman-should-be-treated/4005/55 "2007-06-10T21:11:47Z")
> [@smn1234](#): > > and here’s my reply… ive heard this from 2 or 3 HBs I’ve clubbed with… I’ve candidly asked what kind of guy they want and received the following: a jerk for a one-nighter/hook-up but a nice guy for a relationship.. neither of which should be a limp noodle > > … these were in club settings and the girls were intoxicated but seems valid You don’t need to change how you are as a person to become a jerk if hook-ups are what you seek. But you might need to find a way to tap into a part of you that gives a woman in a club environment the emotional stimulation she is looking for. Tacitus’s discussion below applies here. Balanced, developed personalities are able to channel different archetypes in different situations according to what is appropriate (just as with the saying about the ideal woman being a lady in the drawing room and a whore in bed, jerk and nice guy are two male archetypes). Healthy people don’t need to get stuck in one mode. (when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail 😉 > [@Where to go to meet women?](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/where-to-go-to-meet-women/479/58): > > Not bad… some of them… I bought a handfull for a test drive, and I have 4 on order at the moment, don’t want to overlook a goodie because a couple weren’t so great… Same idea as Glauberman, not as sophisticated in his use of Ericksonian story… Like Idries Shah, there never was another Erickson… having done a seminar with his protege, Steven Gilligan… and a lot directly with John Grinder… each got part of the Erickson magic, nobody seems to have gotten to the essential root of his skill… I be… > [@tacitus](#): > > On the other hand, if the unconscious mind is properly awakened and allowed to reach its potential as a partner with the conscious mind, it can take on a multitude of archetype personalities (for you Jungian PUAs)… from the Playful Child to the Wise Elder, and turn you on to the best things life has to offer, in the best ways, at the right times, to the right degree (this comes from Aristotle, btw, and restated by Glauberman on each of his tapes, a bit differently), and most important, for the right reasons… That said, I thought you might like this article. [Dad or cad is woman's choice](http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/12/02/1070351579826.htmlDeveloping) a flexible repertoire of behavioural flexibility is t [Dad or cad is woman’s choice - www.theage.com.au](http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/12/02/1070351579826.html) Sir Walter Scott was an author, not an evolutionary theorist. He wrote 40 years before Charles Darwin described the process of evolution - and well over a century before scientists began to apply principles of natural selection to the study of human nature. Yet Scott, a 19th-century writer, apparently shared with modern evolutionary scientists the notion that men tend to follow two basic mating strategies. The new research is part of the fledgling field of Darwinian literary studies, in which scholars try to draw connections between literature and evolutionary science. According to a new study, Scott’s dark heroes (rebellious and promiscuous) and his proper heroes (law-abiding and monogamous) reflect the two types of men that scientists recognise by the kinds of relationships they have with women: cads and dads. In the study, published in the journal Human Nature, 257 women in college were asked to read from Scott’s novels. Each read a paragraph describing a dark hero and one describing a proper hero. Then they were asked which type of man they would prefer for a relationship. As predicted by the cad-dad theory of human mating, the women preferred the proper heroes for long-term unions. When asked which character they would like to see their future daughters choose, they also selected proper heroes. But asked who appealed to them most for short-term affairs, the women turned to the dark heroes - the handsome, passionate, daring cads. In theory, the cad approach enables a man to father many children, while the dad approach ensures that the children a man has will thrive. --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/how-do-you-think-a-woman-should-be-treated/4005)._