# Initial TAK observation **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [January 9, 2006, 7:13pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/initial-tak-observation/95 "2006-01-09T19:13:33Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 5
**Author:** ![tacitus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/6a8cbe/32.png) [@tacitus](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tacitus)\ **Post date:** [January 11, 2006, 1:06pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/initial-tak-observation/95/5 "2006-01-11T13:06:03Z")
afterthoughts I also did notice that although the class had a high woman-man ratio that night the women were unusually comfortable talking to me, as if a natural psychological barrier had been reduced. I spoke with a number of the women who were new to the class as if I had known them for a longer time. Where most pheromones seem to somewhat alter one’s rationality about who one is attracted to, TAK feels like it leaves the rational filters intact, there isn’t an attractive pull so much as there is a reduction in resistance… if that makes any sense. It is likely that those persons who are harboring stressful emotion, have anger issues, mental imbalances or strange neurotocisms may produce something else that is an NMDA agonist (the opposite of an antagonist) that makes others edgy or alert, and probably emotionally defensive, in their presence. TAK may provide a different, possibly more effective way to counter the Lone Wolf syndrome… if social loners are that way in part because they put others on edge, the strategy of using the -nols may not be complete, as one may feel conflicted in their presence or chatty but not fully at ease. --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/initial-tak-observation/95)._