# IO vs CTTM2

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/io-vs-cttm2/26710>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [March 4, 2009, 12:08am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/io-vs-cttm2/26710 "2009-03-04T00:08:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2009, 8:07am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/io-vs-cttm2/26710/7 "2009-03-04T08:07:26Z")

</div>

> [@diane999](#):
>
> CTTM is 50% beta androstenol and 50% alpha androstenol. IO is 30% beta and 70% alpha androstenol.
> 
> Diane

Not exactly 🙂. CTTM, the original, used to be a combination of 50/50 but CTTM2 has a few other carrier mones in there as well.

Keep in mind that IO has quite a bit more to it as well.

What Diane is saying is that these are reported to be the base configurations, but please do keep in mind that there is really a whole lot more to it than just that. Of course you have to consider that Diane is borderline genius, which also means she’s borderline crazy 😛. I’ve been trying to convince her she needs a job at Taco Bell, because she has that whole border line thing going, not to mention she thinks outside the bun.

Yeah its late and I need sleep:o

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/io-vs-cttm2/26710)._