# Is Instant Openness too serious? Should its alpha androstenol be raised?

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/is-instant-openness-too-serious-should-its-alpha-androstenol-be-raised/96>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [January 9, 2006, 10:22pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/is-instant-openness-too-serious-should-its-alpha-androstenol-be-raised/96 "2006-01-09T22:22:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MHarris](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mharris/32/2107_2.png) [@MHarris](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/MHarris)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2006, 3:57am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/is-instant-openness-too-serious-should-its-alpha-androstenol-be-raised/96/4 "2006-02-04T03:57:44Z")

</div>

> [@Cloud9](#):
>
> DO the Experimone Anols have fixatives like the final commercial products do? If they do then by all means up the dosage of IO.

They do. They use dpg as a fixative, which is good, but not great. I may be moving to a different glycol entirely that has shown itself to be about 20% better than DPG at fixation. For [pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/) such as androstenol and TAA, though, that still might not be “good enough”.

The compounds in the orange formula used in the Instant line work much better to a give nice extended release and a superior “pheromone cloud”.

I want to keep the Instant line simple, but ExperiMone users tend to know what they’re doing much more than a newbie… I think I’ll add the orange mixture as an option… both a light (same as Instant line) and heavy options.

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/is-instant-openness-too-serious-should-its-alpha-androstenol-be-raised/96)._
