# Is MEO-EST the mysterious MX292 buffer? **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [February 14, 2009, 10:31am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/is-meo-est-the-mysterious-mx292-buffer/26069 "2009-02-14T10:31:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\ **Post date:** [February 14, 2009, 10:31am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/is-meo-est-the-mysterious-mx292-buffer/26069/1 "2009-02-14T10:31:12Z")
Hmm. Hmm. My run tonight was : one layer of “spray, let dry, spray” of MEO @ 12.5 followed by 1x TUTH followed by 1x 292; complimented by 3 sprays more 292 distributed to neck line. It seems that MEO seems to buffer the additional TUTH -none vibe and push it more towards the balanced line. Whereas 4x 292 + 1x TUTH usually puts most of my “dude” friends in a bit of a recluse mode, this seems to shift it back to the point where we are good good good buds. Girls are flirty, and touchy still, but I’m noticing a little bit less of the blatant “CFM” looks. Still getting some “I’m c----z—ecking yooooooouuu out” looks, but slightly less blatant. Not long stares, but more the style of “keeping tabs on where I was” looks. More friendly. I felt more comfortable dancing with other guys gals. Hmm. Intriguing. By lucky chance have I stumbled upon it? Potential negatives? I felt almost too comfortable with myself tonight. I was dancing more than I usually do, BUT I hadn’t had much good reason to dance with this mix prior. This warrants another run, just to make sure, but I’m saying this is a good possibility. Can we get a confirmation/denial? (: ---
**Author:** ![jessejester](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jessejester/32/1683_2.png) [@jessejester](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jessejester)\ **Post date:** [February 14, 2009, 11:22am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/is-meo-est-the-mysterious-mx292-buffer/26069/2 "2009-02-14T11:22:13Z")
Jas said in your musing on MX292 thread on page 3 that it didn’t contain est. ---
**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\ **Post date:** [February 14, 2009, 11:43am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/is-meo-est-the-mysterious-mx292-buffer/26069/3 "2009-02-14T11:43:38Z")
true. I double checked, and she did mention that mx292 does NOT contain est. But remeber, MEO-est is a different molecule than est. I do not have a large amount of experience with MEO so I can only accurately report on the differences I noticed between the 4x 292 + 1x TUTH mix I had used a handful of times. From what I have read, MEO usually requires a fairly larger dosage to create a response. I was working under the guess an additional 12.5 should only change the response noticeably if 292 already contained some MEO(to get past the starting barrier). Since I already know that a mix of 4x MX292 + 1x TUTH is starting to get borderline “edgy” for me, I was trying to note if this effect was diminished. My grand total from this night is that MEO seems to reduce the outright intensity of -none. Which is odd because there are many reports that MEO increases flirting in women. Maybe it’s just a different kind of “flirt.” Either way, I definitely got a good amount of positive response from women, but it was not quite the same as a raw-er -none flirtation. I am not particularly sure yet, but I think that Meo has dulled the -none sharpness in a way that seems similar to the reaction I get from straight MX292. I cannot recall off the top of my head any reports that combine a high -none mix with MEO. But I seem to remember that MEO tests have not induced much in the way of negative male reactions. Tonight I got some good buddy buddy male friendship going that was closer to my experience with “straight” MX292. ---
**Author:** ![mikotorocks714](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikotorocks714/32/1509_2.png) [@mikotorocks714](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mikotorocks714)\ **Post date:** [February 14, 2009, 12:47pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/is-meo-est-the-mysterious-mx292-buffer/26069/4 "2009-02-14T12:47:05Z")
Yeah, that was also what I guessed in your thread. Who knows?