# Let's explore the "Crush Effect"

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/lets-explore-the-crush-effect/53180>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [November 6, 2011, 11:00pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/lets-explore-the-crush-effect/53180 "2011-11-06T23:00:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 76

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mobocaster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c2a13f/32.png) [@mobocaster](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mobocaster)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2013, 1:23am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/lets-explore-the-crush-effect/53180/76 "2013-07-10T01:23:32Z")

</div>

Yes - I find quite a gap in effects between P102/103 but 103 and 104 are much closer in effect. I get P103 as being much harder hitting and far more physical, taking its tone more from the other components in the mix, whilst P104 is lighter, more playful/silly and feelgood in a way that is less dependant on other components.

P104 also lacks the god-awful cheesy stink that I get and can never cover adequately from P103.

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/lets-explore-the-crush-effect/53180)._