Bring on the Monster!!!
I … I … I want to go there.
I’ll let you guys see for yourselves what I meant by “monster” when the MX test pack is released. It’s not far now.
This first round of testing has been quite fascinating.
Catlord, I’m really, really confused as to what a pheromone ‘calculator’ is. I thought at first you just meant manually working out your own sweet spot for various molecules and recording them in an Excel spreadsheet or something, but you wouldn’t be able to do that to 3 decimal places, or calibrate it towards general users. So, if you don’t mind me asking, what is the calculator? I’m not after trade secrets, just curious what it is.
There’s a so called “pheromone calculator” over at www.pherolibrary.com, but the link is dead. So far they just have a spread sheet available.
Sorry, dont mean t hijack But,
Catlord, I will be in the FT. Pierce/PSL area friday night. Can you recommend A good spot for Raw Power testing.
Sorry, thank you, let the Liquid Lust conversation continue.
I still haven’t figured out the LS/Androtics connection. There’s a (four-year old) link for Alpha A314 at the LS site. What’s the difference between LS’s version and Androtics?
So as to not totally hijack this thread, hurry up with the MX pack!
I think I’ve seen or heard of something similar to that before, but I thought the purpose of the calculator was to help you make your own mixes. For example you want to mix: 4mcg of p74, 12mcg of p93, 3mcg of EST, 5mcg of TAL and 7mcg Bnol. And say, you’ve bought togo bottles of each at 12.5mcg per spray. I thought the idea of the pheromone calculator was to determine the correct ratio of each to create the desired mix. Obviously Catlords calculator is something different. Either that or I have a serious misunderstanding of these calculators. I’m just trying to get it clear in my head.
BTW: I wouldn’t recommend anyone try that fictional mix, I’d bet it would be absolutely horrendous all that p93 and TAL.
Not sure WildFlower, but I’m also curious about the whole calculator thing. Could be a secret of the pheromone Gods, for us followers not to know (or at least not to know just yet.) He, he.
Should we start a calculator thread in the forum. Maybe the veterans can chime in and let us know. I just looked at that spreadsheet calculator, all I have to say is 
too complicated would never work
haha I’m very confused too.
You see, 10mcg of p86, isn’t the optimal dose for me personally. Far from. But it may well be for other people. I just can’t understand how something could predetermine relevant doses unless Catlord is inputting his sweet spot. Which would surely make it unique to him? Or is the calculator unique to the ‘Panty scorcher’ mix? i.e. 10mcg is the best dosage of p86 with relation to the other molecules within the mix.
That spreadsheet calculator mikotorocks linked, also made me very confused, but I think it is what I was talking about before. A tool to convert mcg’s so you end up with the right ratio.
Ha, ha same here jesse. “Derrr, I dun now nophing!” - me.
Ha, ha I can just picture the pheromone Gods looking down on us laughing while saying: “These fools, they know nothing muahahahaha!”
If catlord is going by his own “sweet spot” Wild I’m sure that it can’t be that, only because ones sweet spot is never great (or good enough) for someone else. Now balancing out a product right in the middle where it can be seen as being good enough to work for a broad range of people is another story. A perfect balance in other words, but how do we get to that perfect balance? My head hurts now…
Yes. That.
Catlord knows his shit. Do not doubt the Rex Felis.
lol I’m not doubting anyone. I’m just both very intrigued and very confused. If the dosages the calculator, calculates are just unique to catlords MX then how come previous TAL dosages for men have been all wrong? A calculator that determines ‘a TAL dose should be no more than 1mcg for Catlords mix’ is something I can understand. But a maximum does of 1mcg TAL in general - whether right or wrong - is not something I can understand how a calculator could work out. The only thing I can think of is what Mikotorocks suggested, finding the middle ground of a Molecule that is a nice balance for most people. This would still have to be in relation to other molecules though. The pheromone Gods really must be laughing at me tonight.
Ha, ha at all of us Wild. We’re a bunch of ants under the pheromone God’s umbrella shading us from awesome pheromone knowledge! Ha, ha j/k.
Finding the correct balance for everyone (and of a molecule) sounds pretty good, but as you mentioned Wild in relation to other molecules also comes into play. As every little molecule works as their own buffer/s buffering one another, so a lot of thinking and balancing of the molecules you have chosen for a mix comes into play to make sure one another does not drown out each other, but balances one another as an anchor to keep each molecule effect from being drowned in a sea of “noise.” So that’s why testing a product by itself first is always a good idea, so you can fuck around with its dosages until you find your sweet spot, and then work with that sweet spot when it comes to finally mixing it with other products/mixes/molecules.
Fuck, that made my mind hurt ha, ha.
Well if we are getting scientific then I guess we should listen to the Lilium Columbianum too 
Exactly. MHarris’ view on TAL worn by men (and he really is the pheromone god lol) is that the mcg of the molecule should be less than the mcg of the masculine molecules in the mix. i.e. 5mcg none, 2.5mcg TAL, or 100mcg rone, 30mcg TAL, etc, etc. This conflicts with the ‘1mcg of TAL period’ calculation.
MHarris recommended TAL to me as a way to combat any reserved-ness caused by the high none in MX292 (or other none products). My order should be here tomorrow and it’s a 2.5mcg bottle. I’m going to keep with small, half sprays at first because I know I’m dealing with a female pheromone which has the potential to turn me into an androgynous blob if too much is used, however I’m more inclined to believe that 1mcg would have a different effect when paired with various doses of none. Hence, there can be no universal ‘sweet spot’ for a molecule, because the combination of other molecules dramatically changes the dynamic.