# Liquid Sunshine results **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [January 2, 2007, 9:50pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/liquid-sunshine-results/1386 "2007-01-02T21:50:01Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Scottie2Hottie](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/scottie2hottie/32/628_2.png) [@Scottie2Hottie](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Scottie2Hottie)\ **Post date:** [January 2, 2007, 9:50pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/liquid-sunshine-results/1386/1 "2007-01-02T21:50:01Z")
Hi everyone! Haven’t had much time to make it here. I just finished testing the Liquid Sunshine series. MX 136: Feels like boosted Instant Shine. Very upbeat/energetic, confident/carefree and focused. I sense a nice dash of chatty Alpha Androstenol and a hint of Beta Androstenol. I love this stuff! MX 137: Alpha Androstenol seems to lead this mix. Very chatty/friendly w/ a distinct Instant Shine like influence and a touch of Beta Androstenol to temper it. To a certain extent, this mix lived up to it’s namesake the most, but was a bit too chatty…to the point of distraction. This would be great for social use…not so sure about business purposes. MX 138: This one seemed to have a distinct shade of Beta Androstenol seriousness to it. While there was a slight chatty Alpha Androstenol undertone and something reminiscent of the Instant Shine effect, this one felt like it had more weight than [Instant Honesty](https://a314.com/product/instant-honesty/). MX 139: Inconclusive. It seemed very weak and short lived. The effect was somewhere between 136 and 137. The spray bottle leaked nearly 2/3 of the mix into my pocket at work one day and I finally felt a decent effect, but it was still very fleeting. MX 140: Extremely mellow! Somber might be a word for it…almost to the point of being gloomy. This one was kind of a downer for me. It was almost Androstadienone like to me…though, perhaps, more likely a ton of something like TAC. Didn’t care for this mix, personally. So can I get a barrel of MX136? How Much $$? Mmmmm…maybe a 30 ml bottle would be more reasonable? ---
**Author:** ![malacide](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/malacide/32/925_2.png) [@malacide](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/malacide)\ **Post date:** [January 23, 2007, 5:03am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/liquid-sunshine-results/1386/2 "2007-01-23T05:03:25Z")
good job keep it up man mx 136 sounds great ---
**Author:** ![Scottie2Hottie](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/scottie2hottie/32/628_2.png) [@Scottie2Hottie](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Scottie2Hottie)\ **Post date:** [January 23, 2007, 3:06pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/liquid-sunshine-results/1386/3 "2007-01-23T15:06:01Z")
I absolutely loved MX136! If they ever decide to make this a commercial product, I think they should call it “Life of the Party”. That may very well be the best way to describe this mix…no matter where you go, you are the life of the party…even if there is no party. To a certain extent, both MX136 and MX137 were somewhat reminiscent of Pheromol Factor For Men. Pheromol Factor For Men was always a fav for house parties. While both MX136 and MX137 were light, fun mixes, MX136 seemed much more focused to me. ---
**Author:** ![Bunny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Bunny](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Bunny)\ **Post date:** [January 23, 2007, 3:09pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/liquid-sunshine-results/1386/4 "2007-01-23T15:09:19Z")
MX138 and MX140 are extremely sexual for us female users. There are loads of posts in our forum about them both. MX136 has done nada for me, same for MX137 and MX139 I have not roadtested yet. Ail 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\ **Post date:** [January 23, 2007, 4:43pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/liquid-sunshine-results/1386/5 "2007-01-23T16:43:12Z")
Fascinating how the different sexes respond to [pheromones](https://a314.com/) so differently. 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![dinan\_3er](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/dinan_3er/32/766_2.png) [@dinan\_3er](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/dinan_3er)\ **Post date:** [January 23, 2007, 4:47pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/liquid-sunshine-results/1386/6 "2007-01-23T16:47:47Z")
were you using 136 for business applications? or partying?