# Mixing Reactions

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mixing-reactions/6145>\
**Category:** Pheromone Theory & Molecules\
**Created:** [October 21, 2007, 12:16pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mixing-reactions/6145 "2007-10-21T12:16:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dancing\_Joker](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/dancing_joker/32/1924_2.png) [@Dancing\_Joker](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Dancing_Joker)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2007, 3:41am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mixing-reactions/6145/5 "2007-10-22T03:41:41Z")

</div>

> [@Rattlesnake](#):
>
> Since I’ve started mixing a few Q’s have come to mind.
> 
> Do different products react with each other? This mainly comes about from my Ammo, P79 experiments. Ok, so its hardly what you’d call a major mix or anything but still, thinking about it, if I apply them on top of each other do they react and make a better product or are they inert to each other and it makes no difference.
> 
> Only testing can really tell if they make a superior/inferior product when mixed together or when applied seperately. If anyone has had any experiences combined and seperate applications I’d love to hear about it.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Rattle

Based on my experience, P79 stacks with pretty much everything that you combine it with since its effects serve to enhance/amplify other components rather than project one of its own. You should have no problems using it with Ammo, although if you intend to use the two as a combo (applied separately), I would advise that you apply the P79 first and then the Ammo on top to take advantage of the enhanced sillage/dispersion effects of the Ammo cologne base.

Mixing with other components that do have unique and distinct effects will result in mixes that are blended and in some cases, a combination of the individual effects, and in other cases, a whole new set of effects beyond what was originally expected. That’s why mixing is inherently a trial and error process - you could stumble on effects you never expected, create a super mix that has all the major effects that you were seeking, or make an incoherent soup that seems to have no obvious effects.

There are indeed interactions between components in the sense of steering the mix in one direction or another based on the component’s effects. Try to think of mixing as writing music … Which notes do you want to make more pronounced and obvious, and which ones you want to be subtle? Also, which notes would clash with your other notes and end up ruining the song? Volume and intensity play a part as well.

Kitten has a good step-by-step analysis of the concept in her curious combos post:

> [@Kitten's Curious Combos](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/kittens-curious-combos/6017/23):
>
> Okay. Let’s talk about how to create a combo. (This post is for those new to the concept of combos, not the phero-experienced ladies who have already posted on this thread. slight_smile) Each of my combos starts with at least one spray of a well rounded symphonic, or what I’ll call a “base” product. A base product contains all the major female pheromones: Androstenol, TAH, TAL, and light copulins in varying ratios–along with various putative and [experimental pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/product-category/advanced-pheromones/experimental-pheromones/). Androtics’ base mi…

I’ve made hundreds of mixes, and I can confirm that you can also stack mixes with each other so that they can produce separate and specific effects based on how much of each mix you apply. The major advantage is that I can fine tune the effects to what I need at the moment, and I don’t have to carry the dozens of components normally needed to produce the desired effects.

Good luck with your exploration of the art of mixing! 😉

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mixing-reactions/6145)._
