# Musings on MX292

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/musings-on-mx292/25981>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [February 11, 2009, 5:44pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/musings-on-mx292/25981 "2009-02-11T17:44:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 22

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jasmin/32/287_2.png) [@Jasmin](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Jasmin)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2009, 5:05pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/musings-on-mx292/25981/22 "2009-02-12T17:05:38Z")

</div>

> [@Robbie](#):
>
> I’ve been wondering if another ingredient is actually EST (not MEO-EST). Both EST and MX292 showed up _and_ disappeared at nearly the same time frame.
> 
> Call me crazy…

It doesn’t. Just a coincidence.

I may as well note here due to a quirk of (legal) nature we may actually put American made estratetraenol into mass production within a few months. Straight from the original scientist that synthesized it for the original studies.

It’s a beautiful feeling molecule that could do the world a lot of good, without many (or any) downsides. Quite unlike androstadienone, which we’re not much interested in (except for finding safer alternatives). It’s like a double edged knife to too many male users (one where the other sharp edge is the handle itself!)

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/musings-on-mx292/25981)._