# mx 397 vs mx 297 on a woman

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx-397-vs-mx-297-on-a-woman/52530>\
**Category:** Women's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [September 25, 2011, 7:43pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx-397-vs-mx-297-on-a-woman/52530 "2011-09-25T19:43:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Sebastian](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/john_sebastian/32/1060_2.png) [@John\_Sebastian](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/John_Sebastian)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2011, 11:38pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx-397-vs-mx-297-on-a-woman/52530/3 "2011-10-05T23:38:47Z")

</div>

> [@Peanutchelles](#):
>
> Have any of the other women out there tried mx 297 and if so what affect did it have on you?
> 
> My boyfriend has mx 297 and I was thinking of trying it but I didnt want it to give me a manly vibe, i have heard that it is the counterpart of mx 397 😛

MX397 is a reformulated [MX297](https://a314.com/product/mx297/). When I released it I explained that its “MX297 for women” but thats not entirely accurate since both are experimental mixes meaning that it should be - well - experimental. Go for it, I say. Yes MX397 was designed with women in mind and with the MX297 formula as a basis of the vibe.

It doesn’t contain androstenone (neither do) so you should be okay trying it out. Although the fragrance in MX297 (Akuto) is sort of masculine.

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx-397-vs-mx-297-on-a-woman/52530)._