# MX102 experimental A314 mix 1: early user experiences, no effect yet, dosing tips **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [July 25, 2006, 5:22am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-experimental-a314-mix-1-early-user-experiences-no-effect-yet-dosing-tips/521 "2006-07-25T05:22:15Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 29
**Author:** ![MHarris](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mharris/32/2107_2.png) [@MHarris](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/MHarris)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2006, 6:35pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-experimental-a314-mix-1-early-user-experiences-no-effect-yet-dosing-tips/521/29 "2006-08-01T18:35:05Z")
> [@Rob](#): > > Its easier to go more sexual in a club atmosphere. So if you want to add sexual spice to your mix… then go with TUTH as that seems to be the recommended androstenone product. CTTM2 is pretty much a good comfort mone..but there is nothing sexual about it. Same goes with any -rone based products like A314, and I’m assuming MX102 is similar to A314? I’ll have to go get some. Anyway, point is get yourself some TUTH as it is not meant for the “leadership or comfort” vibe… but the sexual vibe. Androstenol not being sexual, depends on how you look at it. I think it is “indirectly” sexual. For instance, ANY pheromone is the end result of hormone metabolism. Therefore, ANY pheromone acts as an exogenous marker of hormone metabolism. i.e., the more pheromones you use, of any kind, the more you’re saying to other people “hey, my body makes lots of hormones” That is indirectly sexual, as it indicates good health, and good health as indicated by hormone and pheromone output often goes hand in hand with reproductive health and reproductive drive. Also, alpha-nol has a “blanking” effect on some individuals. Others, it makes giddy. Sometimes when people are attracted, they “blank out” for a few seconds… the alpha-nol blanking effect may be mentally associated with a time when they “blanked out” in the presence of a “hottie” Giddiness may also be associated with attraction. They may (consciously or unconsciously) search their mind for other times “I felt this way” (giddy for no reason at all), and come to the conclusion… that, hey, they’re attracted to you. So while alpha-nol isn’t the big, overt “Hey, look at my penis” like pheromone that androstenone is, it may be considered somewhat sexual in the way it interfaces with the human condition. In a club environment, alpha-nol may help. Outside of a club environment, it may help even more. Not only does it have a fun aspect to it, but it also tends to be comforting. It’s widely acknowledged in today’s advanced “pick up” communities that comfort can be 70% of seduction. Rone is probably more “sexual” in an every day type environment. It helps to signal a stable, attractive male. Probably more in the provider sense (someone you’d want to stick around) than the “well endowed”, one night stand sense. It’s sexual in the sense that men primarily generate the most androsterone. Most cars driven exclusively by men smell highly of androsterone. Androsterone definitely says “Hey, I’m a guy”, which is sexual in the sense that it is our _differences_, in large part, that make us sexual. The fact that men have penises and beards, sharper faces, and high amounts of certain hormones and pheromones and women have vaginas, softer skin, softer faces, and higher amounts of certain OTHER hormones and pheromones. Reasoning has it that most women probably go out to nightclubs when near the time they’re ovulating. Either that, or it’s out of habit, or their friends are dragging them along. If they’re there because they’re near ovulation, they’re NOT there for a “good guy” (the rone guy)… they’re looking for the naughty boy that they’ll “love” tonight (physically),and _hate_ tommorow. This is clearly established pattern in human anthropology and David Buss’ Evolutionary Psychology, both of which analyze BEHAVIORS (what people ACTUALLY do) and discount what people _say_ they do. Actions truly do speak louder (and more honestly) than words. Women going to nightclubs truly aren’t looking for a good guy to spend the rest of their lives with, no matter what they say. Their 40+ trillion cells are, often unbenknownst to their conscious minds, screaming out for a sperm donor, one with substantially different genetic material to fit their genetic cravings for prequisite variety. One that won’t lead to pedigree collapse. Also, evoltutionary psychology shows that they’re looking for a man that _won’t_ stick around, and get in the way of a possible offspring being raised by the “good” rone guy. The provider. The guy who can truly raise a child, and maintain a household with stability. Androste **none** is definitely the marker of such a “bad” or “naughty” boy. Someone good for greasy, animalistic sex, a few million sperm, and little else. Androstenone, alpha-nol and a bit of Molecule A (AKA “TAA”, which is also a fun, euphoric pheromone) can make for a heck of a “party mix”, that could help lead to some naughty sex sooner than later. You want long term sex, though, or someone to cohabitate with or marry, throw -rone into that mix and reduce the -none. A314 is highly refined -none that doesn’t put out the “Walk all over Me, I’m Mr. Rogers” type prescence that rone alone can sometimes do on some men. --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-experimental-a314-mix-1-early-user-experiences-no-effect-yet-dosing-tips/521)._