# MX102 is definitely 'edgier' than A314

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-is-definitely-edgier-than-a314/1170>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [December 16, 2006, 5:53am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-is-definitely-edgier-than-a314/1170 "2006-12-16T05:53:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sunny](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/sunny/32/929_2.png) [@Sunny](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Sunny)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2006, 7:13am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-is-definitely-edgier-than-a314/1170/13 "2006-12-20T07:13:58Z")

</div>

> [@Socrates](#):
>
> while obviously most of the MX102 pheromones go away after 4-5 hours, some -None remains (-None being pretty much the slowest diffusing molecule). So there is definitely -None buildup issues for me causing ‘edgy’ reactions.

Visionary, I agree.

I used to be a big fan of oil based products, until recently, when I realized that the alcohol based spray gives much more ‘edge’ to A314.

But my concerns are the same: You need to reapply much more and since the andorostenone sticks to the skin, this will add up quicker than with the oil version.

What we need is a second “refresher” bottle with a different formula, with less of the longer lasting pheromones!

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-is-definitely-edgier-than-a314/1170)._