# Mx102-mx105 **URL:** \ **Category:** Store Announcements & Feedback\ **Created:** [November 7, 2006, 9:29pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855 "2006-11-07T21:29:57Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 12\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![nbully79](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c68b51/32.png) [@nbully79](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/nbully79)\ **Post date:** [November 7, 2006, 9:29pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/1 "2006-11-07T21:29:57Z")
Now that they are out of stock will more be made and sold? Or, now only the final spray version will be made and released? It seems MX102 was quite good and MX105 too. How will the decision for final [A314 spray](https://a314.com/product/a314-classic-spray/) product version be taken? ---
**Author:** ![Jasmin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jasmin/32/287_2.png) [@Jasmin](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Jasmin)\ **Post date:** [November 7, 2006, 10:31pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/2 "2006-11-07T22:31:25Z")
> [@nbully79](#): > > Now that they are out of stock will more be made and sold? Or, now only the final spray version will be made and released? > It seems MX102 was quite good and MX105 too. How will the decision for final A314 spray product version be taken? Generally, test packs won’t be remade. What difference did you see between 102 and 105? Was one better for work and the other for attraction? The next pack we had planned were to be based on the favorites from 102 to 105 with other [pheromones](https://a314.com/) added (Alpha Androstenol, TAA, P79, etc.). We still need more feedback on MX102 through MX105 to do that. ---
**Author:** ![nbully79](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c68b51/32.png) [@nbully79](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/nbully79)\ **Post date:** [November 7, 2006, 11:44pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/3 "2006-11-07T23:44:52Z")
> [@Jasmin](#): > > Generally, test packs won’t be remade. > > What difference did you see between 102 and 105? Was one better for work and the other for attraction? > > The next pack we had planned were to be based on the favorites from 102 to 105 with other pheromones added (Alpha Androstenol, TAA, P79, etc.). We still need more feedback on MX102 through MX105 to do that. Ah! I wished I had purchased all of them. I only bought MX102 and fell in love with it. I bought it when we could buy the bottles individually. Later on they were bundled. By the time I made up my mind about it they were gone! MX102 was just like A314 for me, only it’s effects seemed to start soon after application while A314 effects started after 1-2 hrs, sometimes more. I mentioned 105 based on your ‘fun uncle’ report and examine’s ‘success with asian’ report. ---
**Author:** ![Jasmin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jasmin/32/287_2.png) [@Jasmin](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Jasmin)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2006, 1:17am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/4 "2006-11-08T01:17:10Z")
we > [@nbully79](#): > > Ah! I wished I had purchased all of them. I only bought MX102 and fell in love with it. I bought it when we could buy the bottles individually. Later on they were bundled. By the time I made up my mind about it they were gone! > MX102 was just like A314 for me, only it’s effects seemed to start soon after application while A314 effects started after 1-2 hrs, sometimes more. I mentioned 105 based on your ‘fun uncle’ report and examine’s ‘success with asian’ report. Ohyeah, I forgot we started with full bottles of this. I guess this is a special case, because we changed systems. (I know it’s confusing that we’ve been changing things lately. We’ve been fiddling with things to encourage as much experimentation as possible… and it’s obviously been working! 🙂) If there’s 5 other people out there that want an MX102-MX105 pack, I’ll see if can get them to make another small batch of 6 packs. ---
**Author:** ![nbully79](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c68b51/32.png) [@nbully79](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/nbully79)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2006, 1:35am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/5 "2006-11-08T01:35:19Z")
> [@Jasmin](#): > > Ohyeah, I forgot we started with full bottles of this. I guess this is a special case, because we changed systems. (I know it’s confusing that we’ve been changing things lately. We’ve been fiddling with things to encourage as much experimentation as possible… and it’s obviously been working! 🙂) > > **If there’s 5 other people out there that want an MX102-MX105 pack, I’ll see if can get them to make another small batch of 6 packs**. Come on people! ---
**Author:** ![PheroQuirk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9e8a1a/32.png) [@PheroQuirk](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/PheroQuirk)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2006, 2:33am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/6 "2006-11-08T02:33:11Z")
> [@nbully79](#): > > Come on people! count me in… agree with your description of MX 102. think I wrote up 105 also ages back. ---
**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2006, 4:59am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/7 "2006-11-08T04:59:27Z")
I’d be interested in the 102 issue. 😉 ---
**Author:** ![nbully79](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c68b51/32.png) [@nbully79](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/nbully79)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2006, 11:07pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/8 "2006-11-08T23:07:17Z")
Ok, 3 more to go! ---
**Author:** ![Domingo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/domingo/32/781_2.png) [@Domingo](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Domingo)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2006, 9:29am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/9 "2006-11-12T09:29:51Z")
Are these all A314 based mixes? ---
**Author:** ![examine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/examine/32/1665_2.png) [@examine](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/examine)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2006, 3:02pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/10 "2006-11-12T15:02:39Z")
102 and 105 are my favs as well. 105 was a little more sexual 102 was typical A314, but had major range. ---
**Author:** ![nbully79](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c68b51/32.png) [@nbully79](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/nbully79)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2006, 4:33pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/11 "2006-11-12T16:33:27Z")
> [@Domingo](#): > > Are these all A314 based mixes? Yes, different variations of A314. Details are in the store page > **[Experimental Human Pheromones - Pheromone Labs](https://pheromonelabs.com/)** ---
**Author:** ![Domingo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/domingo/32/781_2.png) [@Domingo](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Domingo)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2006, 2:16pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx102-mx105/855/12 "2006-11-13T14:16:16Z")
Thank you!