# mx104? cant seem to find much info. about it? **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [October 22, 2007, 5:17pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163 "2007-10-22T17:17:42Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 11\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![jamesmathers](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/90ced4/32.png) [@jamesmathers](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jamesmathers)\ **Post date:** [October 22, 2007, 5:17pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/1 "2007-10-22T17:17:42Z")
okay, seeing as most MX series r now sold out, and i wanted an [a314 spray](https://a314.com/product/a314-classic-spray/) version…i was left with the task of going for MX104, the least popular of MX 102-105, or, choosing MX134 - women a314. a. y were there plenty of mx104 left when the rest r sold out? b. y is there next to no nfo. about it on here? is there something i need to know about it? ---
**Author:** ![GaDoomZ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e274bd/32.png) [@GaDoomZ](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/GaDoomZ)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2007, 3:07am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/3 "2007-10-24T03:07:24Z")
I use it, you seem to not get as much attention, but when you talk all ears are on you. Kind of hard to explain Also a chick asked me If I would do her. Which I quite random, and she only acts that way when I wore mx104 (tried it 3 times with mx104 got sexual dialogues) The other days, she would not talk like that. Hope that helps some. ---
**Author:** ![jamesmathers](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/90ced4/32.png) [@jamesmathers](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jamesmathers)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2007, 6:03am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/4 "2007-10-24T06:03:36Z")
so dude, how do u compare it with A314 and the other mx a314’s? is it lighter and less serious and dominant? is it alpha? ---
**Author:** ![chadwick](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/chadwick/32/2129_2.png) [@chadwick](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/chadwick)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2007, 6:41am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/5 "2007-10-24T06:41:03Z")
the womans/mx134 is potent on a man. I was either drunk and/or had a bad situation while wearing it at a bar. On a woman it would be great,I just didn’t feel comfortable around strangers with it on. ---
**Author:** ![GaDoomZ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e274bd/32.png) [@GaDoomZ](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/GaDoomZ)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2007, 10:41pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/6 "2007-10-24T22:41:10Z")
I dont have A314 but Mx104 is my least favorite out of the 102 - 105 series, 103 is the winner ---
**Author:** ![nbully79](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c68b51/32.png) [@nbully79](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/nbully79)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2007, 11:09pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/7 "2007-10-24T23:09:29Z")
There is a mention of MX104 in post#9 by Michael in this thread > [@Has anyone used the gay pheromone "Mystery Boy" for Gay Men?](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/has-anyone-used-the-gay-pheromone-mystery-boy-for-gay-men/564): > > ([https://a314.com/product/mystery-boy/](https://a314.com/product/mystery-boy/))What would be its effects applied on a heterosexual male? Perhaps some clue to how you should go about using it. ---
**Author:** ![jamesmathers](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/90ced4/32.png) [@jamesmathers](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jamesmathers)\ **Post date:** [October 26, 2007, 4:14am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/8 "2007-10-26T04:14:31Z")
ummmm…no there isnt nbully. no mention at all…this must be the least discussed MX of all, and i feel i just wasted my money on a dud…how would i even use it??? i am feeling excessively pessimistic about it. ---
**Author:** ![Socrates](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/3bc359/32.png) [@Socrates](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Socrates)\ **Post date:** [October 26, 2007, 9:51am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/9 "2007-10-26T09:51:04Z")
> [@jamesmathers](#): > > ummmm…no there isnt nbully. no mention at all…this must be the least discussed MX of all, and i feel i just wasted my money on a dud…how would i even use it??? i am feeling excessively pessimistic about it. James, I haven’t tried it but I’m sure it is a decent product. After all MX104 is basically the old A314 formula minus one pheromone (a different pheromone is missing than the one taken out of for MX103). So it will probably be a cross between MX102 (the entire old A314 formula) and MX105 (the old formula minus two pheromones). Both of those are decent products which have their own uses (do a search). Oh and please report back with results (don’t expect miracles of course with the Sydney hotties though - [pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/shop/) can only do so much, you know the drill 😃 )… -Visionary [MX104 - Experimental A314 Mix 3 :: Experimental Test Mixes :: Androtics Direct/SmartMones](https://a314.com/) MX 104 is the one of four experimental A314 variations. This mix is a _variation_ of the original trust and respect pheromone 😉 formula AlphaA314. **What’s different between this and the original A314?** **MX 104 lacks one pheromone 😉 from the formula for the original Alpha A314. Unlike Alpha A314, which was in an oil base with a dropper top, all the Experimental A314 Mixes (MX 102-105) are sprayable.** **What are the differences between the Experimental A314 Mixes?** - MX 102 is a translation of the original A314 formula. - MX 103 is a variation of the original A314 formula with one pheromone 😉 removed from the mix. - MX 104 also has one less pheromone 😉 than A314. It lacks a completely differnet molecule than MX 103. MX 105 removes _two_ pheromones from the A314 fray. … _And that’s all we’re going to tell you about that!_ ---
**Author:** ![Smudge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/47e85d/32.png) [@Smudge](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Smudge)\ **Post date:** [October 26, 2007, 11:06am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/10 "2007-10-26T11:06:20Z")
Smell-wise: MX103: decent. MX104: bearable MX105: worse than IFM/m on me. Sprayed it once, thought my nose was off. Tried it the second time, nope, still yuk, seriously putrid. Ended up flushing the whole thing down the sink but saved the bottle. ---
**Author:** ![bubblebob](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/bubblebob/32/2120_2.png) [@bubblebob](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/bubblebob)\ **Post date:** [October 26, 2007, 12:07pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/11 "2007-10-26T12:07:13Z")
Does anyone know why the MX versions of A314 don’t come with the original scent? Doesn’t it mix well in an alcohol base?? ---
**Author:** ![nbully79](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c68b51/32.png) [@nbully79](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/nbully79)\ **Post date:** [October 26, 2007, 12:16pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx104-cant-seem-to-find-much-info-about-it/6163/12 "2007-10-26T12:16:20Z")
> [@jamesmathers](#): > > ummmm…no there isnt nbully. no mention at all…this must be the least discussed MX of all, and i feel i just wasted my money on a dud…how would i even use it??? i am feeling excessively pessimistic about it. Michael says, and I quote from the thread I posted, “_Perhaps (for attraction purposes, I’d supplement with the experimental MX104 ([https://pheromonelabs.com/](https://pheromonelabs.com/)) version of A314, and not normal A314 itself)_.” Ofcourse he is saying there is something to MX104 which makes it better suited than regular old version of A314.