# MX203 around men **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [June 7, 2008, 5:18pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641 "2008-06-07T17:18:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 11\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![examine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/examine/32/1665_2.png) [@examine](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/examine)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2008, 5:18pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/1 "2008-06-07T17:18:14Z")
How does this stuff effect men? Ive seen no reports on it. Wondering if Im going to have to bottle someone at the bar? I hear it has a strong male signature, how do other men cope with that? ---
**Author:** ![nbully79](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c68b51/32.png) [@nbully79](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/nbully79)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2008, 5:43pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/2 "2008-06-07T17:43:31Z")
I won’t say it has a strong male signature. Both men and women behave very friendly around it. ---
**Author:** ![tisha23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@tisha23](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tisha23)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2008, 10:05pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/3 "2008-06-07T22:05:56Z")
It shouldnt have a real strong male signature. Its [P93](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/p93/), TAA anol and just a little anone so it should be less aggressive then the more masculine mixes. Tisha ---
**Author:** ![Phya](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@Phya](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Phya)\ **Post date:** [June 8, 2008, 1:48am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/4 "2008-06-08T01:48:38Z")
Tisha, would you please clairify the contents of mx203 for me please? I found a quote of you saying that mx203 is heavy a-nol, TAK and p93. It’s also been said that mx203 is a-nol, TAA, and p93. Now you’re saying it’s mx203 a-nol, TAA, p93, and a little -none? I’ve asked this a couple times in the main forum to no avail, so I’m asking you now directly. What is really in mx203 (or, rather, I suppose what do you believe to be in mx203)? ---
**Author:** ![tisha23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@tisha23](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tisha23)\ **Post date:** [June 8, 2008, 4:16am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/5 "2008-06-08T04:16:33Z")
Checked my Jasmin notes and its … > [@](#): > > What is really in mx203 (or, rather, I suppose what do you believe to be in mx203)? No not what I believe but what I have been told. > [@](#): > > **By Jasmin** The first pheromone test mix you get is MX203. This is heavy [P93](https://a314.com/product/p93/) based mix Michael made last week. Has lots of Alpha Androstenol and [TAA](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/molecule-a/), too. Comes in a base of what we’ve been calling our “PheroGame” cologne or Fragrance #6, which has similar notes to Cool Water, Unforgivable, Green Irish Tweed, etc. > [@](#): > > Now, based on our observations so far, I’d say MX203 is probably only safe to test where attraction is OK. Probably not an office environment, but maybe retail. This is a low [androstenone](https://a314.com/product/turn-up-the-heat-tuth/) mix, so you don’t have to worry about “scary” vibes too much. Men seem to react fine without hostility or any other untoward behavior with this mix. Also seems safe to wear around friends, but more testing is needed. MX204 is from the t series testers and is 12.5 mcg of TAK in a neroli scent. Oh and point me to the quote I made saying that its TAK, Must have been a typo cause I know there is no TAK in it and I would like to change that post to eliminate the confusion. Never mind found it, yep a typo sorry, Sometimes its hard to memorise every formula to. Tisha gonna get a F on her mone report card this quarter LOL Tisha ---
**Author:** ![Phya](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@Phya](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Phya)\ **Post date:** [June 8, 2008, 4:45am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/6 "2008-06-08T04:45:55Z")
> [@tisha23](#): > > No not what I believe but what I have been told. Sorry, I wasn’t quite sure if you had been told or not. Didn’t mean to imply you were just pulling it out of thin air. > [@tisha23](#): > > Now MX204 has TAK in it instead of TAA Meaning mx204 is like mx203 except it has TAK instead of TAA, resulting in a-nol, TAK, and p93? I thought mx204 was TAK +[Neroli](https://a314.com/product-category/scented/androtics-neroli/) only. Was mx204 originally just TAA + Neroli? Are the mxs being switched up on us? Or am I misunderstanding your posts. > [@tisha23](#): > > Never mind found it, yep a typo sorry, Sometimes its hard to memorise every formula to. Tisha gonna get a F on her pheromone report card this quarter LOL No problem, it happens. At least now I know that mx203 doesn’t contain TAK. Sorry for those of you who were mislead by my comments, in any. Thanks for clearing it up. Although, I am a little disappointed because it kills any theory I had about mx203 and TAK. 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![tisha23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@tisha23](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tisha23)\ **Post date:** [June 8, 2008, 9:20am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/7 "2008-06-08T09:20:54Z")
> [@](#): > > No problem, it happens. At least now I know that mx203 doesn’t contain [TAK](https://pheromonelabs.com/). Sorry for those of you who were mislead by my comments, in any. Thanks for clearing it up. Although, I am a little disappointed because it kills any theory I had about mx203 and [TAK](https://pheromonelabs.com/). 🙂 Sorry about your theory, it was my bad I made the typo. Your correct MX204 is 12.5 mcg of TAK and neroli. I should have been more clear in my post above. These are part of the T series testers so each one has a different formula. Tisha ---
**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\ **Post date:** [June 8, 2008, 10:10am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/8 "2008-06-08T10:10:30Z")
> [@examine](#): > > How does this stuff effect men? Ive seen no reports on it. Wondering if Im going to have to bottle someone at the bar? > > I hear it has a strong male signature, how do other men cope with that? This is probably my favorite product here, I use this in every application, plus I think it is the best smelling one but to answer your question I never have a problem around men. ---
**Author:** ![Phya](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@Phya](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Phya)\ **Post date:** [June 8, 2008, 5:12pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/9 "2008-06-08T17:12:15Z")
> [@tisha23](#): > > Sorry about your theory, it was my bad I made the typo. Don’t be. 🙂 Knowing more about the contents of mx203 or what isn’t in the contents, is better than thinking the composition is something else. It just means I need to go back, check the scenes and how they broke down and reevaluate them, knowing I can’t attribute anything to TAK. Thanks Tisha! 😃 ---
**Author:** ![ariadne](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/ariadne/32/770_2.png) [@ariadne](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/ariadne)\ **Post date:** [June 8, 2008, 6:54pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/10 "2008-06-08T18:54:41Z")
> [@tisha23](#): > > Its P93, TAA Alpha Androstenol and just a little Androstenone Oh man, I can’t use this in the way I would like, then. Maybe at home once things are already definitely on their way… ---
**Author:** ![jonno101](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jonno101/32/367_2.png) [@jonno101](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jonno101)\ **Post date:** [June 8, 2008, 9:24pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx203-around-men/13641/11 "2008-06-08T21:24:43Z")
Examine - you don’t need to worry with [MX203](https://a314.com/product/mx203/). I use it alot these days adn have had no problem around males (my signature & presence comes across pretty heavy - muscular build, close cropped hair and serious at first glance, but not a single problem). If anything, MX203 makes men friendlier towards you. Take the plunge. The only thing I’ve found is that it can be trickier to find the precise ‘sweet spot’ with it, but even so, you get good results anyways. It’s just that when you get precisely the right balance you’ll feel like you’re Hugh Heffner 😃 I am always amazed that it doesn’t make other guys jealous when I get some quite obvious IOIs 🆒. They seriously don’t seem to ming…