# MX282 vs MX274 **URL:** \ **Category:** Women's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [October 17, 2008, 4:44am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx282-vs-mx274/21539 "2008-10-17T04:44:30Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![ariadne](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/ariadne/32/770_2.png) [@ariadne](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/ariadne)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2008, 4:44am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx282-vs-mx274/21539/1 "2008-10-17T04:44:30Z")
Those of you who have tested both, which do you like more? Are they similar in effect, you think? If there are differences, can you put your finger on them? ---
**Author:** ![remmy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/remmy/32/2451_2.png) [@remmy](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/remmy)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2008, 5:38am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx282-vs-mx274/21539/2 "2008-10-17T05:38:08Z")
hi! a quick review of what i think about them: mx282: def. a sexual phero. the smell is easier to cover up. i wore it once with my friend and he kept trying to smell my legs (my application point).. a couple of months ago, i wore it when i was fighting with my sorta-tg he completely lost it and we had some great time that night 😉 mx274: sexual and social.. but i think more social than not. i dont get along with the mx274 smell.. it’s a little cloying on me. the same tg mentioned above ignored me completely when i wore that so im actually more partial to mx282. also the thing is, he’s very very sensitive to smell and he hates chocolatini no matter how discreet it is, so it could’ve been him just trying to get away from the smell. so in conclusion.. i personally prefer mx282 just because although i think its more subtle it is definitely more sexual. i just hope they sold it as a stand-alone sometimes 😉 ---
**Author:** ![madison](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/madison/32/546_2.png) [@madison](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/madison)\ **Post date:** [October 18, 2008, 7:53pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx282-vs-mx274/21539/3 "2008-10-18T19:53:27Z")
I’m curious too! I’ve only tried the mx274 ---
**Author:** ![msselva](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/msselva/32/943_2.png) [@msselva](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/msselva)\ **Post date:** [October 18, 2008, 10:58pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx282-vs-mx274/21539/4 "2008-10-18T22:58:49Z")
Imo, phero-wise (without the scent package) I like 282 alot more, people are more friendly, and it’s quite sexual in a subtle way (not more right in your face kinda thing like is/a or lam per say). Guys just start noticing you more and it builds up as the whiff more of mx282 lol. But scent wise, I prefer mx274 since my skin cloys the coconut (which is a note in mx282) _sigh_