# MX286 Report

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx286-report/18296>\
**Category:** Women's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [August 26, 2008, 7:58pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx286-report/18296 "2008-08-26T19:58:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ntk23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/65b543/32.png) [@ntk23](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/ntk23)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2008, 8:28pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx286-report/18296/5 "2008-08-27T20:28:06Z")

</div>

Oops, I just saw the “no perkiness” and must’ve missed the parenthetical “which it did” re: the [Instant Shine](https://a314.com/product/shine/). LOL no worries 🙂.

Anyhow, the MX286 might not be the sort of thing you can actually OD on as such. I was surprised when reading Mark’s thread [Initial Impression of P91](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/initial-impression-of-p91/18351) that he was spraying such copious amounts of P91 on himself, also an experimental molecule. So I guess it’s not like -none or anything! How much mcgs in a single spray of your MX286?

If you and your husband can find a party to go to or something…? I’m not sure what MX286 is supposed to do exactly, but maybe the social programming at the workplace and at the parent-teacher meeting means that the right context for the MX286 to work is not there. Anyway, I’m intrigued by all this P- and MX- exploration I’m reading about now, well I’m not going to get a Women’s Test Pack, LOL that _would_ be avant-garde of me, but I might pick up something experimental with my next order.

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx286-report/18296)._