# MX292 assistance

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-assistance/31389>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [August 7, 2009, 11:32am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-assistance/31389 "2009-08-07T11:32:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richm717](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c0e974/32.png) [@Richm717](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Richm717)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2009, 11:32am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-assistance/31389/1 "2009-08-07T11:32:32Z")

</div>

Hey all,

This product is on its way (along with a few others). Just looking for a little feedback/advice, per usual.

Picked up a girl the other night using the Honesty/Openness combo. Would it be a safe idea to introduce mx292 the next time out, or would that alter the initial vibe she got the first time out? Is this a better product for initial meetings, things like that?

Thanks,  
Rich

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rattlesnake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8e8cbc/32.png) [@Rattlesnake](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Rattlesnake)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2009, 12:15pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-assistance/31389/2 "2009-08-07T12:15:13Z")

</div>

As far as I know, it contains quite a good helping of none, however, it seems to be very well buffered. I’d try out 1 spray to begin with and gauge her reaction. Although, if you dont want to involve too much risk in the process. You could add additional buffers with openess/honesty.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richm717](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c0e974/32.png) [@Richm717](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Richm717)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2009, 4:23pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-assistance/31389/3 "2009-08-07T16:23:29Z")

</div>

> [@Rattlesnake](#):
>
> As far as I know, it contains quite a good helping of none, however, it seems to be very well buffered. I’d try out 1 spray to begin with and gauge her reaction. Although, if you dont want to involve too much risk in the process. You could add additional buffers with openess/honesty.

Yea, I’m def concerned with the risk of suddenly introducing the mix. I also was thinking of throwing on some [Ammo](https://a314.com/product/ammo/), in addition to the IH/IO I had on last time…maybe that would be a safer bet?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikotorocks714](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikotorocks714/32/1509_2.png) [@mikotorocks714](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mikotorocks714)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2009, 4:37pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-assistance/31389/4 "2009-08-07T16:37:52Z")

</div>

If anything it’ll only (probably) make MX292 even more friendlier than it would be on its own. Not that MX292 isn’t very friendly because the -none in MX292 is buffered pretty good, but since IO and IH buffer -none as well it’ll probably make it a little bit “sweeter.” AMMO, IO, and IH is a good combo too.