# MX292 I love you

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [February 1, 2009, 10:44am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630 "2009-02-01T10:44:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 10:44am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/1 "2009-02-01T10:44:40Z")

</div>

Batch 1, the usual sorts.

X4 sprays MX292, X1 spray TUTH. applied mostly to the upper chest, with one 292 to the line where my shirt ends and my neck begins.

What can I say, but if you like 3 sprays, you’ll like 4. SO MX292; does it have any none to start with? I couldn’t tell you, but I have a tough time balancing none, and the hit’s are never spectacular… With the TUTH I felt some of the none edginess that I don’t notice with 292 alone. I noticed this a smidge when I ran a MX292 X3 + 1X TUTH, but more so this time. This could mean that MX292 has some none?

ANYWAYS. SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WORTH IT. No none OD. Massive hits all over the place.

So I take a spot at the place near a pillar, and I’m looking around, and I’m not liking the lack of cute girls around. but as luck would have it, a group of 4 or 5 cuties decide to settle down near me, within about 3 feet. I was just kinda “spacing out” pretending not to notice, enjoying the band. But I know they’re checking me out. Every single one of them. To the point where the group sort of changed from facing the stage to a rough semi-circle with half of them pretty much looking at me, the other half making sideways glances. Um, hi, you aren’t fooling anybody. At this point, I was dead tired though, cause I had a long day and I hadn’t really started to loosen up. But I tried to at least “catch them in the act” and give a smile or two to reciprocate.

Couple beers and bands later, and that’s just a trend. I’m feeling pretty good getting a second wind, Girls seem to be outright DIHL left and right. Geez gals, stop already. The girls I’m friends with seem ok, but I think that’s just since they know me so well they try to normalize themselves. I swear I caught a “lip bite” or two though. 🙄

The mix seems to have lost a little bit of the dudeness to it though. Good friends are alright, but I ain’t killin them like I was with 292 alone, and I didn’t make any new “buds.” So the -none is definitely peaking through. This still doesn’t prove whether or not there is -none in MX292. SteveO’s Icm A got great dude hits and that had a lot of none.

Concert ends, and party begins. Cute girl set #1 is there. Lucky me. 😃 I kinda make the face talk with some of the house friends, end up next to the cutest girl out of that group. She’s talking to a friend of mine, so I jump into the conversation when it turns to something I can relate to. BIG smile. Like the kind of smile that says “I’m so happy you finally talked to me.” Names, a bit of small talk, her friend needed to use the bathroom. Why do girls always need to go in pairs? Bye cute stuff.

hanging around, shooting the shit, another girl turns to me, “Hi i’m, \_\_\_, who are you. hi hi hi” oh hello. Doesn’t really go anywhere though, but was totally random. lot’s of being checked out by girls. This is very significant, cause usually I never _notice_ girls looking at me. Usually girls seem to be a lot more sly about that sort of thing.

I keep on running into cute girl, and she’s still giving me big smiles. I miss a great chance though on the dance floor. My fatal weakness is that I can only dance with people when I’m trashy trashed. I can dance fine-ish if I’m just minding my own space, but I can’t make the jump to dancin’ wit’ you. ):

These were a hits so strong you couldn’t not notice. Any girl within six feet of me had an uncontrollable urge to “look around the room” in my direction. All over the place girls were looking at me like I was Brad Pitt, whispering amongst themselves. I wish I was a bit more forward, so rats to me. A lot of girls that were really cute.  
And this one girl was the most flustering thing. I didn’t even get her number, and man, this girl was way out of my league. So in my awe, I dropped the ball due to nerves. oops.

**NOTES** : The range on this baby seems pretty small, so it works best in really crowded places. But get within 6 feet or so, and you’re in. Just hold that range for like 10 minutes (even if you don’t make any conversation). After that, they’re hooked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mark-in-dallas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mark-in-dallas/32/860_2.png) [@mark-in-dallas](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mark-in-dallas)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 11:07am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/2 "2009-02-01T11:07:41Z")

</div>

TOLD YA! yeah MX292 has None and lots of it, it’s just really well buffered!

Great report Marty!

I got a couple interesting MX292 reports to post myself tomorrow. And tonight I did get a couple more butt grabs from a little hottie, although it was more on a friendly level, cause I’m still content with who I’m seeing, but didn’t get to see her again tonight.

Also got the hotties number without even asking after 2 guys tried and failed, only getting her to take their numbers and say maybe she’ll call. After the second AFC walked away I dug out my cell and told her that if she was collecting numbers I could give her some of mine. She asked for my number, and I said why you probably ain’t gonna call me either, and she responds by saying yes I will, I already told the last 2 guys that you were my boyfriend! I give her my number and she punches it into her phone and asks me if I want hers. So I respond by saying I guess so cause it would only be fair. She hits send and as my phone rings tells me her name again. I look at her and say, like I could forget your name.

Just a bit of a teaser. Full report to follow. But, aside from a bunch of IOI’s there wasn’t any action, because I’m content with who I’m seeing now and ain’t gonna do anything to screw it up. But, the indian girl was there and actually followed me home after the club closed and just left. But, NOTHING happened. I’m sure the evenings escapades will get back to the asian girl I’m seeing though, and unless she radically alters the story I come out looking golden.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bubblebob](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/bubblebob/32/2120_2.png) [@bubblebob](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/bubblebob)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 2:44pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/3 "2009-02-01T14:44:21Z")

</div>

Still doubt that there’s -none in it, especially after this post by Jasmin yesterday:

> [@](#):
>
> I’m extra interested in the batch of [MX292](https://pheromonelabs.com/) since the results are so much different than what I personally expect given it’s composition. People are guessing it’s heavy in pheromones it most certainly doesn’t (or shouldn’t) contain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bubblebob](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/bubblebob/32/2120_2.png) [@bubblebob](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/bubblebob)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 3:23pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/4 "2009-02-01T15:23:38Z")

</div>

> [@mark-in-dallas](#):
>
> TOLD YA! yeah MX292 has None and lots of it, it’s just really well buffered!

Just a thought: If I recall correctly you are wearing quite a lot of androstenone regularly, right? Could it be that MX292 just takes that residual -none and amplifies it so you get very sexual results, while on the other side people not wearing much -none most of the time mostly get social results? Maybe it just takes a little androstenone as an addition to the mix (just like your residue or the androstenone in A314 that Steve wore MX292 with) to turn the social MX292 into a sexual MX292?

I guess I’ll overcome my game scent allergy next week and try some MX292 with one or two sprays of TUTH…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WildFlower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/wildflower/32/1260_2.png) [@WildFlower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/WildFlower)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 3:28pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/5 "2009-02-01T15:28:38Z")

</div>

Perhaps because Steve and mark are so successful with woman in general it’s easy for mx292 to come across as sexual. I find mx292 to be very flexible and could easy become sexual if you give of that vibe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 4:49pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/6 "2009-02-01T16:49:22Z")

</div>

I didn’t say I was sold on the -none idea, just that I’m warming up to it. 😛

Either way, this mix works wonders on buffering additional -none, so when you want to kick up the sexuality a notch, you can go straight for the raw stuff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 4:51pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/7 "2009-02-01T16:51:33Z")

</div>

> [@bubblebob](#):
>
> Still doubt that there’s -none in it, especially after this post by Jasmin yesterday:

i sort of agree if anything this posts shows by adding none to the mix it got better results which means there was no none to begin with just has more nols and better buffers, which is what happened to me when i added raw power

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mark-in-dallas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mark-in-dallas/32/860_2.png) [@mark-in-dallas](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mark-in-dallas)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 6:08pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/8 "2009-02-01T18:08:17Z")

</div>

> [@bubblebob](#):
>
> Just a thought: If I recall correctly you are wearing quite a lot of androstenone regularly, right?

I mainly only wear pheros on the weekends, so no it couldn’t be a buildup effect, and I’ve not worn any None at all in 2 weeks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 6:27pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/9 "2009-02-01T18:27:52Z")

</div>

Yep, I’m going with heavy -None in this mix too. Like anywhere from 6-12 mcg per spray and I’m betting, as reported already by me, some serious [P74](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/p74/) and now I would even believe TAA and P83 as buffering agents. I did a little test the other day and made a concoction with some stuff I thought might be in the MX292 and the results while not as exciting where extremely similar.

Anyway that’s my guess.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mark-in-dallas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mark-in-dallas/32/860_2.png) [@mark-in-dallas](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mark-in-dallas)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 6:36pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/10 "2009-02-01T18:36:21Z")

</div>

Yep, I agree with Steve. Those are the same molecules I landed on, and I think it probably has BetaNol too, as well as a couple more molecules we’ve not zeroed in on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 6:47pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/11 "2009-02-01T18:47:22Z")

</div>

well if that is the case when i put 4 sprays on with 2 drops of raw power and had awesome hits means i had about 50 mcg of none

i dont think i ever had that much of none and great hits but once i get some more mx292 i will be able to test again with high amounts of none and see what happens

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WildFlower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/wildflower/32/1260_2.png) [@WildFlower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/WildFlower)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 7:00pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/12 "2009-02-01T19:00:25Z")

</div>

I think the two most prominent molecules in the mix are p74 and B-nol (although jasmin mentioned there are other nols than just alpha and beta and they are new putatives somewhere in the p100+ range. so I think it may be one of them)

I also think the mix is heavy is p83 and TAA but they’re in the foreground to the p74 and the nol.

> [@](#):
>
> P86 - Visual attraction (Gawd, you’re beautiful!)

I’ve never tried p86 but if that description is right I’d say that p86 is present in mx292 as well.

I’d say maybe some rone as well because the mix is definitely masculine but seems too friendly to be none causing the masculinity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 7:03pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/13 "2009-02-01T19:03:29Z")

</div>

> [@WildFlower](#):
>
> I think the two most prominent molecules in the mix are p74 and B-nol (although jasmin mentioned there are other nols than just alpha and beta and they are new putatives somewhere in the p100+ range. so I think it may be one of them)
> 
> I also think the mix is heavy is p83 and TAA but they’re in the foreground to the p74 and the nol.
> 
> I’ve never tried p86 but if that description is right I’d say that p86 is present in mx292 as well.
> 
> I’d say maybe some rone as well because the mix is definitely masculine but seems too friendly to be none causing the masculinity.

she also said it is not a complicated mix if i recall so we might be overanalyzing it

there might only be two molecules in it for all we know..and maybe all new molecules who knows

> [@jasmin](#):
>
> I’m extra interested in the batch of [MX292](https://pheromonelabs.com/) since the results are so much different than what I personally expect given it’s composition. People are guessing it’s heavy in pheromones it most certainly doesn’t (or shouldn’t) contain.

here is the exact link to the post

> [@MX292 sux omg wtf bbq](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/9):
>
> Besides things that have had them for awhile, like A314 and some of the other consumer products, just MXs. We just recently started adding them to MXs, due to the strong demand re-issues. You can pretty much assume that if it has no batch # on it, that’s it batch #1. I’m extra interested in the batch of MX292 since the results are so much different than what I personally expect given it’s composition. People are guessing it’s heavy in pheromones it most certainly doesn’t (or shouldn’t) contain…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mark-in-dallas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mark-in-dallas/32/860_2.png) [@mark-in-dallas](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mark-in-dallas)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 7:40pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/14 "2009-02-01T19:40:17Z")

</div>

> [@denec](#):
>
> well if that is the case when i put 4 sprays on with 2 drops of raw power and had awesome hits means i had about 50 mcg of none
> 
> i dont think i ever had that much of none and great hits but once i get some more mx292 i will be able to test again with high amounts of none and see what happens

Have you worn [Raw Power](https://a314.com/product/raw-power/) on top of other None based mixes?

I find that I can add 2 or 3 drops of Raw Power on top of pretty much anything I wear, without putting me over the top.

Raw Power works a bit differently than None in an alcohol based spray and you can wear it at higher levels. It doesn’t hit hard and fast but is more of a building effect, allowing targets to grow accustomed to the None, instead of smacking them in the face with it.

So yeah, I can believe that you had 25 to 30 mcg’s of None from the mix and another 20 in Raw Power and got great hits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jayarea](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/48db29/32.png) [@jayarea](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jayarea)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 7:50pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/15 "2009-02-01T19:50:25Z")

</div>

good report. seems like the key to mx292 is a long (ish) exposure time at short range.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pherophreak](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/pherophreak/32/1531_2.png) [@pherophreak](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/pherophreak)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2009, 8:57pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/16 "2009-02-01T20:57:37Z")

</div>

Mx292 = Is + [Ammo](https://a314.com/product/ammo/).

LOL

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dancing\_Joker](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/dancing_joker/32/1924_2.png) [@Dancing\_Joker](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Dancing_Joker)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2009, 2:05am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/17 "2009-02-02T02:05:32Z")

</div>

> [@mark-in-dallas](#):
>
> Have you worn Raw Power on top of other None based mixes?
> 
> I find that I can add 2 or 3 drops of Raw Power on top of pretty much anything I wear, without putting me over the top.
> 
> Raw Power works a bit differently than None in an alcohol based spray and you can wear it at higher levels. It doesn’t hit hard and fast but is more of a building effect, allowing targets to grow accustomed to the None, instead of smacking them in the face with it.
> 
> So yeah, I can believe that you had 25 to 30 mcg’s of None from the mix and another 20 in Raw Power and got great hits.

With the proper buffering, you can wear 50 mcg of None easily without OD effects, especially with a combination of fast (alcohol) and slow dispersion (oil) mixes. I’ve gone out on multiple occasions loaded with different mixes with None mcg totals of 50+ and gotten lots of positive IOIs without any None aggression at all.

My guess with MX292 is that there is a lot of None that is buffered by a huge amount of socials. However, unlike some earlier mixes, it’s a social mix first, and none mix second, rather than none first and social effects second. Previous mixes probably had concentrations of socials in ranges of 2.5-15 mcg at most, but I suspect there are levels approaching 30 or more mcg in MX292. The huge concentration levels are taking effects to another level beyond what regular mixes have achieved. I have some ideas, and I’m working to see if I can produce a mix with these effects 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jasmin/32/287_2.png) [@Jasmin](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Jasmin)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2009, 2:31am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/18 "2009-02-02T02:31:55Z")

</div>

> [@bubblebob](#):
>
> Still doubt that there’s -none in it, especially after this post by Jasmin yesterday:

Nah, I mean the reports of all the nols and high socials and whatnot in 292 confused me. 292 was intended to be more sexual and less social, from what I understand.

The specific thing that scared me is that either MX291 or MX293 did have a lot of social mones in it, so I figured a batch of one of those might have been accidentally labeled as MX292 by accident. We have batch logs, but they wouldn’t necessarily prevent the liquids being dispensed into incorrectly labeled bottles. (we require one item be batched at a time with at least two people to be present to make sure the right things goes into each bottle, but we’re also looking into running a video log of the batching and filling process, too, for extra protection in case something does go wrong)

Thankfully, with the new batch out, there is already a little consensus that batch 1 and batch 2 work the same. Not enough consensus to call anything conclusive yet, but hopefully my fears are unwarranted.

If we do see more consensus that batch 1 and batch 2 work the same, then all of the interest effects are from the mix as designed. It could be just be an interesting mix that challenges our preconceptions of what the molecules do in tandem. Since MX292 has a different type of structure than you’d expect (most of the guesses about what it contains are wrong), this would be an interesting mix to publish to encourage new directions of experimentation and understanding.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2009, 3:08am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/19 "2009-02-02T03:08:10Z")

</div>

now i am really curious what is in it LOL

btw i dont see MX291 or MX293 in the store is that coming out soon?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![douche](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/douche/32/1144_2.png) [@douche](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/douche)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2009, 3:18am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630/20 "2009-02-02T03:18:20Z")

</div>

> [@denec](#):
>
> now i am really curious what is in it LOL
> 
> btw i dont see MX291 or MX293 in the store is that coming out soon?

ditto. this is becoming more and more interesting by the day…

[Next page](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-i-love-you/25630.md?page=2)
