# MX292 Inconsistancy...

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [May 2, 2009, 6:43pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587 "2009-05-02T18:43:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ericadam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/c0e974/32.png) [@ericadam](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/ericadam)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2009, 6:43pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/1 "2009-05-02T18:43:18Z")

</div>

Interesting testing lately with MX292.

The first time I sprayed on MX292 (1x) front of neck, I was flying high, feeling great, confident and attracted attention - very obvious IOIs and hits. I’ve worn it out again at the bar 2 nights ago and three nights ago (1x) front of neck and didn’t really feel the self effects and didn’t get a any obvious IOIs or hits. And last night, 1x to the front of the neck and a 1/2 spray of [Instant Shine](https://a314.com/product/shine/) (to see if perhaps it needed some social buffering) to the sides of the neck and another dud last night. Mostly same crowd and was dressed the same (going out casual - blazer, jeans, etc.) Strange..

I usually get very consistent hits with ammo (2x) and IS (2x) when I go out, but wanted to give MX292 a go. I was happy with the first application, but the subsequent applications have been duds. Thoughts?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Feel\_Good](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mr.feel_good/32/1148_2.png) [@Mr.Feel\_Good](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Mr.Feel_Good)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2009, 7:03pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/2 "2009-05-02T19:03:44Z")

</div>

Not sure, but most of us tend to use 2-3 sprays of MX292 at a time. Might be that since it was your first time using it, you picked up on the more subtle amount, but try bumping it up a little bit. See if that works for you. Three is the magic number for me. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ericadam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/c0e974/32.png) [@ericadam](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/ericadam)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2009, 7:14pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/3 "2009-05-02T19:14:57Z")

</div>

will test that today/tonight!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gegogi](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/gegogi/32/1536_2.png) [@Gegogi](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Gegogi)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2009, 7:48pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/4 "2009-05-02T19:48:34Z")

</div>

Most of us have “self-effects” at first but the effects gradually fade with regular or repeated use. In this aspect mones are not unlike many recreational drugs. If you wanna get high you gotta keep upping the dose and, finally, get zip and need to move on to something stronger. It’s an endless cycle and a grand waste of time. Use the mones for what they were designed to do: effect change in your targets.

I rarely feel a damn thing from mones I wear. However, my targets do and I really prefer a clear head over “flying high.” Puts me in control and keeps me sharp. Nothing worse than drinking your own poison…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tfrankz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/tfrankz/32/468_2.png) [@tfrankz](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tfrankz)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 12:50am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/5 "2009-05-03T00:50:40Z")

</div>

Yep try 3 sprays with some nols maybe. I used lower and not as good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mahalo\_silver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8dc957/32.png) [@mahalo\_silver](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mahalo_silver)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 4:52am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/6 "2009-05-03T04:52:31Z")

</div>

Yep mx292 is definately overrated and inconsistent. But there is always a way to make any juice work for u. For me? a shot of tal or p79 and IS added to 2 sprays will wake it up…it seems to come into its own when combined with socials or TAA or a shot of [Ammo](https://a314.com/product/ammo/) too. It also, for me anyway, works very well around girls i already know and not so well around strangers or girls i just met. U r correct though, if u want consistency in affects, stick with Ammo.

P83 was similiar to mx292 on these forums about a year ago, plenty of hype, and dissapointing results when i used it. Then i just trialled and errored till i realised it combines brilliantly with Ammo or Tuh and p86.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mahalo\_silver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8dc957/32.png) [@mahalo\_silver](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mahalo_silver)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 4:54am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/7 "2009-05-03T04:54:55Z")

</div>

I dont think the batch issue is really valid any more, as i have recently read 2 hit reports from batch 2, one of the batches that had been coming under scrutiny for poor performance 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![M\_P](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/m_p/32/1633_2.png) [@M\_P](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_P)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 4:59am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/8 "2009-05-03T04:59:04Z")

</div>

Any results with batch 10 anyone?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tfrankz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/tfrankz/32/468_2.png) [@tfrankz](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tfrankz)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 6:33am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/9 "2009-05-03T06:33:49Z")

</div>

Well if you read my {Mix 292 let down} I am one that this mix needs work with. With that said the self effects from this mix is worth keep on testing for me. Gives me that boost if you know what I am talking about.

About the batch thing I have tested 3 batches now maybe four {I have to check what I used and have left} and from what I see they seem all the same to me.

And Mix 292 and 272 is a good fun night out at the bar. I think the Mix 272 is a hit spray some on and let the good times roll!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 8:47am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/10 "2009-05-03T08:47:35Z")

</div>

Wow, mahalo, way to be a buzz kill.  
I don’t know what you are expecting, but not everything is great for everybody. EVERYTHING is going to be inconsistent, and if you don’t know that by now then I don’t really care to argue with you. It’s a matter of what works for you ain’t gonna work for me.  
So I’m sorry if you feel like you’ve wasted your time on MX292, but can you please get off of your soapbox already.  
You’re killing my good vibes man.

edit: sorry if that comes off as being a dick, I was real drunk and high on anone when I wrote it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bosshank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/91b2a8/32.png) [@bosshank](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/bosshank)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 11:14am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/11 "2009-05-03T11:14:17Z")

</div>

Like Mr FG said - I use about 3 sprays myself. Give that a try.

Like Gegogi said - most self-effects wear off after a while - and I am also glad they do for the same reasons.

I think your recent experinece may kinda be tied to the two. If you had a lot of self-effects from the first time - felt great, lots of confidence, etc - that may have carried over into performance with results. If you got no self-effects the next two times and you were more subdued then that could also count for “performance”.

This is based also on the thought that most people use 3 sprays. Going with one the first time you could have had plenty of self-effects carrying over into social performance with just enough phero to give you and edge at that level. Next two times more subdued social performance but one spray did not provide enough “edge” to overcome a more subdued you. Remember, this stuff does not cause women to fall outta the sky into your lap - they give you an edge when you are out there on your game.

Three sprays should give plenty of social edge. We will see what it does with self-effects.

And you asked the question - try not to get upset with someone if they gave you an answer you did not expect or like. Even those answers can give you fresh perspective or ideas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jessejester](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jessejester/32/1683_2.png) [@jessejester](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jessejester)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 3:07pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/12 "2009-05-03T15:07:28Z")

</div>

> [@mahalo\_silver](#):
>
> a shot of **tal** or **p79** and IS added to 2 sprays will wake it up…it seems to come into its own when combined with socials or **TAA** or a shot of Ammo too. It also, for me anyway, works very well around girls i already know and not so well around strangers or girls i just met. U r correct though, if u want consistency in affects, stick with Ammo.
> 
> P83 was similiar to mx292 on these forums about a year ago, plenty of hype, and dissapointing results when i used it. Then i just trialled and errored till i realised it combines brilliantly with Ammo or Tuh and **p86**.

How manny mcg’s of these are you adding?

> [@tfrankz](#):
>
> And Mix 292 and 272 is a good fun night out at the bar. I think the Mix 272 is a hit spray some on and let the good times roll!

I am glad to hear this mix worked for you. It has been my favorite for the past few months. DJ tried it out and said he got a good amount of hits from it also. I hope more people try it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mahalo\_silver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8dc957/32.png) [@mahalo\_silver](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mahalo_silver)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 3:54pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/13 "2009-05-03T15:54:56Z")

</div>

> [@marty](#):
>
> Wow, mahalo, way to be a buzz kill.  
> I don’t know what you are expecting, but not everything is great for everybody. EVERYTHING is going to be inconsistent, and if you don’t know that by now then I don’t really care to argue with you. It’s a matter of what works for you ain’t gonna work for me.  
> So I’m sorry if you feel like you’ve wasted your time on MX292, but can you please get off of your soapbox already.  
> You’re killing my good vibes man.

Marty, many have complained about not getting desired results from mx292. Did i start this post? no. I think it is valid to create an objective testing experience re: any [pheromone](https://a314.com/), correct? Many reports about mx292 dub it as an Love Potion 9 and have created unrealistic expectations for some users, so whats wrong with getting a well-rounded review of testers experiences from all different reporters? It is more accurate feedback and sorry if my feedback on mx292 sounds negative, but it is in the interest of everyone to get all experiences.

Didn’t i just STATE that the Batch issue is irrelevant? Buzzkill? what on earth r u talking about? u dont like my posts? then dont reply okay? This all started with the Batch issue which was a legitimate concern for some users and an interesting question to present. …people learn from positive and negative experiences.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mahalo\_silver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8dc957/32.png) [@mahalo\_silver](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mahalo_silver)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 4:03pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/14 "2009-05-03T16:03:45Z")

</div>

> [@jessejester](#):
>
> How manny mcg’s of these are you adding?

Hey Jessejester, so the mix is Ammo, p83, TAH as the main players. IS and p86 r support players.

I use small doses of p83 [10-20mcg] placed over a spray of Ammo [old-scented], then p86 [20mcg]. Perfect synergy. TAH completes it at 5-10mcg…

In 2 years on these forums, this has been the most effective mix i’ve found. As Mikotorocks, Perronec and others have noticed, P83 makes Androstenone work better and viser-versa.

Not sure the role p86 plays, maybe a tad subtle, but it synergises perfectly with p83. As Mad Tater once said, they r brothers. Now what makes this mix perfect if when u add TAH into it half way through. I use it behind neck with IS at 2 sprays…what happens is the girls REALLY get forward and initiate and feel comfortable with the Androstenone arousal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2009, 11:39pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/15 "2009-05-03T23:39:17Z")

</div>

Hey mahalo sorry sorry. Like I said, a bit too much to drink + [Raw Power](https://a314.com/product/raw-power/) makes me short minded.

I think this is all just going to contribute to better mixes in the future.  
MX292 works well for what I want out of a phero mix, but I definitely see the where the flaws start to appear. There is definitely a component that offsets the -none in a drastic sort of way. I don’t think I would call it a Love Potion or even an amazing sexual mix. The sexuality contained in it is a sort of underpinning sensation that lingers in the air. It’s not overt or demanding, and that’s rather what I dig about it.

I would greatly like to see what you think of the Raw Power pack. If you don’t have it yet, might I recommend it? It might be more along the lines of what you are looking for. It speaks much louder and much more forward.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ericadam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/c0e974/32.png) [@ericadam](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/ericadam)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2009, 6:02pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/16 "2009-05-04T18:02:14Z")

</div>

Thanks for the responses all.. I am going to demo 3 sprays and see what happens. I also have batch 12 if that is any constellation. But yes, Ammo seems very consistent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WildFlower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/wildflower/32/1260_2.png) [@WildFlower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/WildFlower)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2009, 11:04pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/17 "2009-05-04T23:04:27Z")

</div>

Ammo is a consumer product for a reason. And it’s because it’s so consistent, for so many people, in so many different environments. It is without doubt my favourite product.

When Androtics makes available a new mix which has attraction in mind, I naturally compare it against Ammo. This is a little unfair to be honest, because whilst both Ammo and MX292 are attraction mixes, they have considerable differences. Ammo will and does create attraction and consequently visible IOI’s. MX292, also works very well at creating attraction, and in that respect is consistent - the IOI’s perhaps not so mcuh. When you try out the 3 sprays of MX292, keep an eye out for any respect hits you get. They should be hard not to notice, we’re talking major ass kissing. This should give you an indication of you’re perceived status whilst wearing MX292. You see, you may feel like a normal, down to earth guy. But others are seeing you as someone VERY SPECIAL. It would take a lot of courage for any girl to show visible attraction to someone as special as you.

If you want to see just how much attraction MX292 really does create wear it around some girls you know, you’ll see why they call it pherobomb. Girls you don’t know will also, no doubt feel the same attraction, but to see it ‘consistently’ you’ll have to brush up on body language or initiate. MX292 is A314’y like that. Don’t write it off just yet, I promise its amazing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ericadam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/c0e974/32.png) [@ericadam](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/ericadam)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2009, 2:46am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-inconsistancy/28587/18 "2009-05-05T02:46:45Z")

</div>

Excellent post, helps boatloads!
