# MX292 sux omg wtf bbq

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [January 31, 2009, 8:55am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586 "2009-01-31T08:55:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 8:55am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/1 "2009-01-31T08:55:13Z")

</div>

Got your attention yet? Don’t worry I’m not gonna burst your heart over everybody’s new sideline mate.

But today was what I’d call a 292 miss.

Attention, streamofconciousnessaheadwatchoutpleasedon’tsayIdidn’twarnyou.

I take a shower, do some quick exercise (something to get the heart pumping), a quick drink, and run out to the great unknown. 3 shots 292.

I feel great. real great, like I’m pumped. POW. good to go. this mx has pretty good self effects. Like I am me, and I am great. It’s a weird feeling of being perfectly comfortable with myself, but not in a way I usually associate with other forward [pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/) like -none or -rone.

But, party is sort of a hit/miss. Odd crowd, not my usual scene, so I couldn’t work it, play up my usual friendships, give the usual cute girls the “20/20.”

In fact, I really only had two or three “targets” the whole party.

SO I’m way out of my comfort zone, but I still feel alright. i don’t net anything huge, but I fit in enough not to be totally out of place in what seems to be a tight clique. I can’t seem to find a place at the party, like a common ground with anyone in particular, so I’m still a bit bummed, but I’m still having a good time.

I deliver one or two good one-liners, give one of the cute girls some crap for not remembering me from last time, have some fun, but never really get a good hit hit hit. Couple of ok-ish hits, not what I think is an attraction hit, but like decent social hits. I seem to be having a weird night, so I can’t hold anyone for more than 5/10 min.

Party ends early, run somewhere else. Same vibe, not many on the “plate-of-friends” (friends make you look good, don’t forget this). but I’m still in good spirits. I get a bit of “vague interest” from a girl whose usually a “tough cookie”. the type of girl “give you 30 seconds or i’m gonna write you off, wait why are you still here” sort of girl. Hit, but I lost it. Not really chase worthy anyways, so no loss. Tired, I ain’t ain’t in the mood sorry, shove off. Hit’s from another girl, oh gee oh gee oh gee, but I’m really not digging yah see. feel bad, try not to be mean, but that’s that.

**So sum**. For as awkward as the night was, I still got a good number of hits, but they weren’t what I was aiming for. If I didn’t know what I was looking for, I might not have noticed the extra interest. I was feeling tired going in, and even though I tried, I was still tired tired tired. I felt the night was a lot of fun, and could have been a lot worse. I always felt like I was having a good time, even though I wasn’t hitting it out of the park.

Also, I don’t know what the hell you did to the scent, but this can’t be the same game scent I just wore the other day in MX272. Like What the hell, I could’t stand MX272 for 2 minutes, but MX292 smelled really GOOD almost immediately after application. In fact, I’m smelling it right now, and there are qualities to it that still smell good. Is there a small “pine-y” factor to it? I never noticed before; I was pinching my nose.

sorry for the rant guys. (:

Ok, quick accounting information. My MX292 is batch number 1. I am early 20’s crowd was approximately the same cutting off at 30. Predominately Caucasian crowd.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tisha23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@tisha23](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tisha23)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 9:04am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/2 "2009-01-31T09:04:09Z")

</div>

Great report

> [@](#):
>
> Also, I don’t know what the hell you did to the scent, but this can’t be the same game scent I just wore the other day in [MX272](https://pheromonelabs.com/) . Like What the hell, I could’t stand [MX272](https://pheromonelabs.com/) for 2 minutes, but [MX292](https://pheromonelabs.com/) smelled really GOOD almost immediately after application. In fact, I’m smelling it right now, and there are qualities to it that still smell good. Is there a small “pine-y” factor to it? I never noticed before I was pinching my nose.

Remember the scent will change depending on what mones are being covered in it so thats why it smells different to you.

Tisha

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 9:28am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/3 "2009-01-31T09:28:59Z")

</div>

Don’t distract me from the terror that is MX@(@???#\>!?\>!$!%\>

joking aside though, I totally agree, MX203, the 271,2,3 and the Ammo test pack, all have minor variations due to the pheromones, but at the same time I disagree about the consistency of the scent.

While the mixes all smell marginally different with regards to the pheromones, the variations seem to vary far too widely, even between “minor versions” of the same mix, that I don’t see simple pheromone variations as the true cause. For example, the individual mixes in the ammo test pack seem very “inconsistent” in cologne strength.

It’s like a response curve. Like the MX292 scent that is lingering right at this moment now (7hrs after application,) is like the MX272 scent almost 16hrs after application. Same scent, but crank it up too much and it’s like “get me the hell out of here,” but at a much lower vibe it’s like “uhhhhh sexy sexy.” To me it feels more like the difference is due to a ratio of “scent to pheros to base alcohol.” Like if I started at MX272 and I wanted to reach the starting scent response from 292, I’d wait about 5 or 6 hours and then it seems to reach a similar point.

At this point I am merely guessing, so I may be mistaken. (:  
Another possibility would be the highly diffusive nature of The Game. Perhaps small pheromone changes can have a drastic effect.  
I would like more concrete information from the highers if chance would grant it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mahalo\_silver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8dc957/32.png) [@mahalo\_silver](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mahalo_silver)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 1:12pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/4 "2009-01-31T13:12:17Z")

</div>

yeah after a nice day with mx292 yesterday, i didnt get any consistency out of it today…have i still got residual NPA effects or maybe there is something in mx292 that can cause an OD. second day of testing - 1 good/ 1bad. today 2 sprays. so u really have to wear it at 3 sprays to get the amazing affects?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jasmin/32/287_2.png) [@Jasmin](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Jasmin)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 2:20pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/5 "2009-01-31T14:20:16Z")

</div>

Thanks for the report.

What MX292 batch are you using, btw?

Everyone, when there’s a batch # on a bottle, could you please remember to include that in all reports? Actually, we really need a sticky involving that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tfrankz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/tfrankz/32/468_2.png) [@tfrankz](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tfrankz)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 3:49pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/6 "2009-01-31T15:49:55Z")

</div>

Hey Jasmin, my bottle as no batch number?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xiphoid](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/xiphoid/32/1852_2.png) [@Xiphoid](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Xiphoid)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 4:02pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/7 "2009-01-31T16:02:33Z")

</div>

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> Thanks for the report.
> 
> What MX292 batch are you using, btw?
> 
> Everyone, when there’s a batch # on a bottle, could you please remember to include that in all reports? Actually, we really need a sticky involving that.

Jasmin, is that just for Mx292 or does that go for all Mx’s/P’s?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jasmin/32/287_2.png) [@Jasmin](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Jasmin)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 4:59pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/8 "2009-01-31T16:59:03Z")

</div>

> [@tfrankz](#):
>
> Hey Jasmin, my bottle as no batch number?

Batch 1, probably. We just started putting them on MXs, due to the strong demand for re-issues.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jasmin/32/287_2.png) [@Jasmin](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Jasmin)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 5:11pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/9 "2009-01-31T17:11:20Z")

</div>

> [@Xiphoid](#):
>
> Jasmin, is that just for Mx292 or does that go for all Mx’s/P’s?

Besides things that have had them for awhile, like A314 and some of the other consumer products, just MXs. We just recently started adding them to MXs, due to the strong demand re-issues. You can pretty much assume that if it has no batch # on it, that’s it batch #1.

I’m extra interested in the batch of MX292 since the results are so much different than what I personally expect given it’s composition. People are guessing it’s heavy in pheromones it most certainly doesn’t (or shouldn’t) contain. I’m extremely interested to see if there’s any differences between batch 1 and 2. Maybe I’m just paranoid, and these results were expected by the mix creator. It was an unusual mix, I guess, and the effects could be from the combination of interesting molecules.

There’s no “batches” for putes or normal experimones yet, since they’re custom made for you at the dosage you want. A batch of 1 for 1 person. Yet there is a batch # associated with the chemical itself, so we might want to incorporate that somehow. I’ll have to think about that when my mind is a little clearer.

Thanks for asking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jayarea](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/48db29/32.png) [@jayarea](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jayarea)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 5:21pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/10 "2009-01-31T17:21:37Z")

</div>

i heard there was a bbq going on here…?

good report marty. it’s a nice kick back to reality to show us that mx292, like any other phero, has its good and bad days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 5:25pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/11 "2009-01-31T17:25:47Z")

</div>

Hi Jasmin,

This is the first I’ve heard of this labeling, otherwise I’d gladly comply. I will go back and edit my reports for this MX.

I’ve got batch number 1 I guess (It’s not labeled). I just ordered another yesterday, so I’m guessing I will have one from a different batch to compare.

Of all the toys I have, only my [MX203](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/mx203/)/204 have batch numbers on them so I never noticed. At one point you guys were putting order numbers on putative bottles, but the newest order of putatives actually has a little “batched by #5” on it instead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WildFlower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/wildflower/32/1260_2.png) [@WildFlower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/WildFlower)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 5:25pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/12 "2009-01-31T17:25:49Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I’m extra interested in the batch of MX292 since the results are so much different than what I personally expect given it’s composition. People are guessing it’s heavy in pheromones it most certainly doesn’t (or shouldn’t) contain. I’m extremely interested to see if there’s any differences between batch 1 and 2. Maybe I’m just paranoid, and these results were expected by the mix creator. It was an unusual mix, I guess, and the effects could be from the combination of interesting molecules.

Is a batch number just that a batch number? and the version number is if the mix has been tweaked or altered a little?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Feel\_Good](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mr.feel_good/32/1148_2.png) [@Mr.Feel\_Good](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Mr.Feel_Good)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 5:43pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/13 "2009-01-31T17:43:39Z")

</div>

> [@WildFlower](#):
>
> Is a batch number just that a batch number? and the version number is if the mix has been tweaked or altered a little?

Batch number is just that. Which time they made this set of MX’s all together. When they have a different version, its tested out as a new MX.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cabledawg299](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a9adbd/32.png) [@cabledawg299](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/cabledawg299)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 5:49pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/14 "2009-01-31T17:49:26Z")

</div>

mx 292 i have batch 2, and have not had any results with it what so ever,compared to what i read about it i was real excited to get it but was dissappointed after trying it is there a difference between batch 1 and batch 2.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 5:51pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/15 "2009-01-31T17:51:43Z")

</div>

Kinda funny though. The phero queen is all flustered and in a huff. This mix has blown her mind like a game of battleship. Don’t believe it, can’t be true, what ever shall we do. Someone must have goofed, heads will roll, it just doesn’t add up, subtract up, multiply or divide.  
😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bonecrkr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/9d8465/32.png) [@Bonecrkr](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Bonecrkr)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 5:59pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/16 "2009-01-31T17:59:15Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> If I didn’t know what I was looking for, I might not have noticed the extra interest.

That pretty much sums up my experience with it for the two times I have tested it. Mine is batch #2 (sorry to have forgotten to add that in my two posts).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Feel\_Good](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mr.feel_good/32/1148_2.png) [@Mr.Feel\_Good](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Mr.Feel_Good)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 6:54pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/17 "2009-01-31T18:54:29Z")

</div>

> [@Bonecrkr](#):
>
> That pretty much sums up my experience with it for the two times I have tested it. Mine is batch #2 (sorry to have forgotten to add that in my two posts).

Interesting… i’ve had really great results with mine, but it’s also been batch #1… seems to be a trend here?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bonecrkr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/9d8465/32.png) [@Bonecrkr](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Bonecrkr)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 7:45pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/18 "2009-01-31T19:45:46Z")

</div>

I’m going to try this out again but wearing more, to see if it’s an issue of dosage. Further tests over the week with P79, [P83](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/p83/) and none added to see what happens with each.

> [@Mr.Feel\_Good](#):
>
> Interesting… i’ve had really great results with mine, but it’s also been batch #1… seems to be a trend here?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dapg01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b3f665/32.png) [@dapg01](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/dapg01)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 7:56pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/19 "2009-01-31T19:56:29Z")

</div>

My results were great also with batch #1. I also have a bottle of batch #2 I will be testing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2009, 7:57pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586/20 "2009-01-31T19:57:28Z")

</div>

i dont see any batch listing on my mx292 anywhere on my bottle and had great results with it

[Next page](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx292-sux-omg-wtf-bbq/25586.md?page=2)
