# mx301-304 pseudojournal **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [February 17, 2009, 5:21am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-304-pseudojournal/26175 "2009-02-17T05:21:26Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![jessejester](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jessejester/32/1683_2.png) [@jessejester](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jessejester)\ **Post date:** [July 6, 2009, 11:43pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-304-pseudojournal/26175/41 "2009-07-06T23:43:39Z")
So Jay, did it feel to you like there was -none in it? This is what is puzzling me, Steve has said he is pretty sure MX301 is 1a, but I really didnt get many none-like hits from 301, just mostly social ones. Mx302 on the other hand, I got bunch of -none-like hits from it. I have been opened more wearing 302 than any other mix. If you had to venture a guess, which 2 would you say had -none in it? My guess is 301(eventhough I didnt see the results) and 302. 303 and 304 just simply dont feel -noneish to me. ---
**Author:** ![jayarea](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/48db29/32.png) [@jayarea](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jayarea)\ **Post date:** [July 7, 2009, 12:24am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-304-pseudojournal/26175/42 "2009-07-07T00:24:35Z")
back when these mixes were rumored to be the icm mixes i didn’t pay much attention to them and now that it’s somewhat confirmed, i’ve only started to analyze the results for pairing purposes. from re-reading my journal, it seems i got more dihl hits with 301 and more social hits from 302. a few key things that stood out were the quiet guy and i opening up in class, and the girl in my group on the good testing day giving me dihl. just a wild guess here, but if i had to pick something out, i would say 302 has a-nol and no -none. this would correlate to ICM 0.25.05a. i would say 301 has -none or some attractant, due to the dihl hits. this would be either ICM 0.25.1a or ICM 0.25.05b. both of these have TAC and i’m not familiar with this one, but i didn’t notice the a-nol hits in 301 as i did 302, so process of elimination leaves ICM 0.25.1a, which has b-nol. this is in line with steve’s estimation that ICM 0.25.1a is mx301. **complete speculation below** using today’s test, i didn’t notice myself opening up more or anybody else having the urge to talk, so from just this one occurrence and disregarding -none, i would say mx303 does not have a-nol. this leaves ICM 0.25.1b, with b-nol and no -none, meaning mx304 would be ICM 0.25.05b, with a-nol and -none. with mx304, i slept terribly, and the only ingredient i am not familiar with is TAC, thus perhaps the TAC is causing my sleep issues. also, my mx304 reports note no big hits but lots of general laughing and socializing. a-nol + taa at work? ---
**Author:** ![jessejester](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jessejester/32/1683_2.png) [@jessejester](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jessejester)\ **Post date:** [July 7, 2009, 12:40am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-304-pseudojournal/26175/43 "2009-07-07T00:40:12Z")
Thank you for the break down. I am now going back to the drawingboard. I might just have to accept the fact that the mix I have been getting so much attenion with could possibly be [P83](https://a314.com/product/p83/) based. The bad part is, my 301 and 302 are riding on fumes, so that really just leaves me wit 303 and 304 to base a theory on. I have to admit though, it is kind of cool to have figure these out for myself. With alot of the other mx’s I was able to know what to look for from other peoples responces. All the more reason for a re-release so we can get a second bottle for testing. Thanks again for your insights. ---
**Author:** ![jayarea](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/48db29/32.png) [@jayarea](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jayarea)\ **Post date:** [July 8, 2009, 6:29pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-304-pseudojournal/26175/44 "2009-07-08T18:29:08Z")
super shotgun report, just got back from the gym and need to clean up real quick before i leave out of town for a few days. hopefully more testing results await. mx304 v1b1 1s split forearms gym 12p exposure started at 12:05p hit 1: a group of moms and their daughters (moms 30’s, daughters 16-19) were standing around talking to a trainer. they were kinda stuck up and didn’t motion to budge when i approached, so i just cut right through their group. (screw em, haha) later on they all come over to near me because that’s where the exercise mats are. they each grab one and begin their ab routine. throughout the 20 or so minutes they were there they glanced at me a few times. the funny thing is whenever i walked by them to rerack weights or whatever, they would purposely grunt louder/crunch harder/get their legs just a bit straighter/etc. female exercise form of peacocking, if you will. i found this interesting. hit 2: a girl walked behind me in the parking lot coming in. i saw her go to the treadmill area and then disappear, then about 30 minutes into my set she comes over, again for the exercise mats. she would always set her mat up really close to me, glance at me in the mirror, and at the end of her set she did some sort of lunge thing and performed this facing away from me (butt pointed at me) whereas everyone else normally faces the other way on the mats. if there was one legitimate hit from today, this was it. “hit” 3: the super slut. i saw her earlier in the weights section doing curls, a gaggle of guys around her. this was the true definition of “i come to the gym to pick up guys.” tight yoga pants either purchased off the rack or tailored to sit at her pelvic bone, skinny almost to the point of being unhealthy and where her pelvic bone jutted out, and while her breasts weren’t the greatest for doing so, they were pushed up tight to create cleavage. she came looking for attention and she was also “looking for” attention, in that she would scan the room every few seconds to see if anybody was looking. i had to walk by her to get some equipment and later on she glanced at me a few times even though i didn’t look at her first, but i’m not sure if i can count this as a hit. conclusion: not terrible hits so far at the gym, but i think because of the scent alone, i naturally garner attention. i know if some lady just came from work and is still smelling like her perfume and not like sweat, i’d be more inclined to be around her. most guys at the gym either smell natural or like that axe crap, and i believe girls find it refreshing to catch a whiff of neroli or even game or akuto, provided it’s not too strong. with that said, there’s been more interest now in this pack, especially in 301 and 302, and some inconclusive results with 303 and 304, so i’m taking every chance i get to test what i can. ---
**Author:** ![jayarea](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/48db29/32.png) [@jayarea](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jayarea)\ **Post date:** [August 21, 2009, 12:33pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-304-pseudojournal/26175/45 "2009-08-21T12:33:06Z")
from last night 2s mx302 back neck and forearms in my new city, smoking is allowed in bars so i’m taking some time getting used to that. realize that mixes don’t diffuse well in smoke either. first bar was just getting lively as we were leaving so no hits there. second bar was packed but a bit smoky. a few ioi as girls got close to squeeze by or whatever, no sustainable hits. ---
**Author:** ![WildFlower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/wildflower/32/1260_2.png) [@WildFlower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/WildFlower)\ **Post date:** [August 21, 2009, 12:56pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-304-pseudojournal/26175/46 "2009-08-21T12:56:59Z")
> [@](#): > > i would say 302 has a -nol ([Instant Openness – Ice Breaker Pheromone for Men - Alpha A314](https://a314.com/product/instant-openness/)) and no -none I’m convinced both MX301 and MX302 contain anone - MX303 and MX304 being the p83 ICM mixes. I made a bottle of the bnol p83 ICM mix some time ago and the hits I get from it feel very different to MX301 and MX302. I agree that MX301 feels _slighly_ more aggresive than MX302 but I do think the only difference is that MX301 has anol in where as MX302 has bnol. ---
**Author:** ![KnowledgeIsPower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/knowledgeispower/32/1201_2.png) [@KnowledgeIsPower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/KnowledgeIsPower)\ **Post date:** [August 21, 2009, 5:47pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-304-pseudojournal/26175/47 "2009-08-21T17:47:49Z")
> [@WildFlower](#): > > I’m convinced both MX301 and MX302 contain anone - MX303 and MX304 being the p83 ICM mixes. I made a bottle of the bnol p83 ICM mix some time ago and the hits I get from it feel very different to MX301 and MX302. I agree that MX301 feels _slighly_ more aggresive than MX302 but I do think the only difference is that MX301 has anol in where as MX302 has bnol. What do you mean they’re the [P83](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/p83/) ICM mixes? I wasn’t aware any of the ICM’s had P83 in it? [Previous page](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-304-pseudojournal/26175.md?page=2)