# MX301 Test 2 **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [April 6, 2009, 3:48am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-test-2/27774 "2009-04-06T03:48:04Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 7
**Author:** ![jessejester](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jessejester/32/1683_2.png) [@jessejester](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jessejester)\ **Post date:** [August 21, 2010, 2:22am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-test-2/27774/7 "2010-08-21T02:22:12Z")
My thoughts of this MX havnt changed much with the exception now being positive that it contains -none. Those who have read my journal know that this is one of my favs. Please keep in mind that this report was done when there was little to no input about this MX. Me, Jayarea and a few others were the only ones reporting on it. We didnt know at the time that it was the ICM test pack. What alot of you may not know is that MX301 almost dissappeared. As in…was probably not going to be made again because there was not alot of feedback on it. This test pack was over shadowed because it was released around the same time as MX292 which was dominating the main forum. It took a few of us creating a buzz about it, and poll/post to convince them that enough people would be interested in them making it again. It is now a forum staple. As it should be. Vote For MX301 & MX302 RE-Release:POLL ( 1 2 [3](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/vote-for-mx301-mx302-re-release-poll/189900) … Last Page) --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-test-2/27774)._