# MX301 wow

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-wow/31615>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [August 16, 2009, 11:43pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-wow/31615 "2009-08-16T23:43:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KnowledgeIsPower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/knowledgeispower/32/1201_2.png) [@KnowledgeIsPower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/KnowledgeIsPower)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2009, 8:06am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-wow/31615/24 "2009-09-09T08:06:02Z")

</div>

I just thought I’d give an update to what I think so far of the two different pheromones:

From what I’ve gathered, the difference between MX301 and MX302 seems to be Alpha-nol and Beta-nol according to multiple posts by Steve. So accordingly to that, it seems that MX301 and MX302 are .1a and .5b, not .1a and .1b. If we can get someone to confirm that there is no -none in MX302, then that would make MX302 .1b, but as of yet, I have no reason to suspect MX302 to be .1b because I did not notice the effects of P83 as .1b has that.

So for current purposes, I’m going to judge MX301 and .1a and MX302 as .5b. Also this post from Steve confirms this:

> [@301/302 Question..](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/301-302-question/31904/15):
>
> From my testing perspective I can say yes and with 100% certainty. Anol and I do not mix well, but Bnol and I do. MX301 works where as MX302 does not work very well. That’s how I know.stuck_out_tongue

So what does that mean? Well, .1a has the b-nol, and so that leads me to conclude that MX301 contains a more IH social aspect. While .5b has a-nol and thus contains a more IO social aspect. Of course, IH is 70% b-nol and 30% a-nol and IO is 70% a-nol and 30% b-nol, but for these purposes we can just assume it’s a more powerful version of the two. So why is this important? Well, MX301 from the tests I have done so far seems to be a more intimate pheromone. It works well for one-on-one situations, or in closed settings.

MX302 rather is more social. It has more of the resemblance of IO because of that. This one is good in every day situations as well as in closed settings. Now both of these give me the DIHL from girls. They are both equally attracting to women, but the way they do it is slightly different. Experimenting with this is actually fun and spotting the difference is easy.

I still need to do more MX302 testing, but these are my conclusions for now.

**The verdict?** Buy MX301 and MX302 in the gallons!

**A quick re-cap:**  
**MX301** - Sex w/Intimate Attraction - IH b-nol (.1a)  
**Mx302** - Sex w/Social Attraction - IO a-nol (.5b)

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx301-wow/31615)._
