MX301 wow

Field Reports & Anecdotal Experience Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports
22

Wow, ok so two new tests with MX301.

Test #6

2 Sprays MX301 on inside of elbows
2 Sprays IG on inside of elbows
5 Sprays of P83 on Hair and Wrists

This test was very interesting. I once again met the same girl and her brother at a family dinner. I felt a stronger attraction from her, where if I would move away, she would follow me. However, I still felt a sense of insecurity from her. She is a very shy girl, so I’m not sure if P83 got to her 100% (read Test #7 for more on this). But I definitely noticed her checking me out multiple times.

As for the guys, I had very very interesting reactions. I had a MUCH more social night with P83. I’m not sure if it was the P83 or not, but I’m thinking it might be because I didn’t have this reaction when testing without the P83. I noticed that both the guys, girls, and adults were VERY talkative and social. It reminded me of the Spaceland effect? It was very interesting and might be because of P83’s disinhibiting effects.

Test #7

2 Sprays of MX301 on wrists
2 Sprays of IG on wrists
2 Sprays of Androstadienone from NaturalAttraction on wrists
6 Sprays of P83 on hair and wrists

Ok, so tonight I definitely had my best night yet. I think the Androstadienone helped with P83’s disinhibiting effects (it is the main base of IFM, so it should make girls more comfortable). Strong note, the -ienone definitely did give me some negative effects from the guys. Some of the guys (those my age) did give me a somewhat hard time haha, but I think my results are worth it. However no apparent distinction on the parents.

Now, the girl in interest, the same girl I’ve been targeting in all 7 of these tests (who is 18 for the reference of testing) started out the night by commenting on how she loved my shirt. Later in the evening we began with playing a card game on a round table. Half way in I felt this girls feet underneath the table, and that definitely lasted for a couple of minutes. She seemed to not be reserved at all.

However, what I have noticed with this girl, is when she does things like this, she still has a reserved side to her. For example, later on in the game, we play footsie again, but then she pulls right away (this happened again a couple weeks ago when the first time she was cool with it, but the second time she remains reserved). It still baffles me why this happen, but I think the -none in the MX301 might have something to do with it.

I know she is very sensitive to -none, and so maybe 2 sprays of MX301 is too much? My next test will be with the -ienone, P83, IG, and either 1 spray of MX301 or I might test without the MX301.

Anyways, later that evening we watched a movie together with everyone, her sitting on the couch 90 degrees from me. During the movie I definitely saw the usual IOI with her feet responding to my feet, playing with hair, trying to sneak looks, etc.

Overall, was a great night. My next report will come next week, so will let you know what I decide with the MX301. I will be seeing her 3 more times in the next 3 weeks before I’m off to school. I’m going to keep my P83 at 6 sprays, my -ienone at 2 sprays, and my IG at 2 sprays. I’m going to play around with MX301 and try 1 spray, no sprays, and then maybe go crazy and try our 4 sprays?

Also, any ideas on the P83? Is it a good idea to keep it in the mix? I’m questioning my reasoning with keeping it, because Steve clearly put the P83 in his .5b mix and not the .1a mix (of ICM) and we’ve seen so much results out of .1a. I feel like it might be a good idea to get rid of it, but oh so little time to try these combinations! lol

23

Haha, Maybe I should change the title of this thread to “MX302 wow”?

lol here’s this weekends results:

What used:
MX302 - 2 sprays on wrists, 1 touch up spray after 3 hours
IG - 2 sprays on wrists, 1 spray on Hair, 1 touch up spray after 3 hours
-ienone - 2 sprays on wrists

Situation:
Indoors, close range (3-10 ft), 4 girls aged 18, 17, 19, and 16

So wow, I really love MX302. It gave me some different hits than MX301 for sure. First of all, I got more DIHL looks than I did with MX302, but on top of that, the girls were much more social.

Even though it’s my first test, I am convinced this is one of the ICM’s without -none. Why? Because it worked so well on younger girls. It was actually scary, while playing cards one of the 12 year old girls was playing footsie with me under the table, and I was like, uh-uh that isn’t going to happen! lol

Anyways, back to the main game…The 4 girls there ALL gave me more attention than I have ever received from each. The 16 year old was rubbing on me while getting herself some food, the 19 year old was constantly turning her chair exactly facing me when speaking to the group and giving me attention even though now she was facing away from everyone else while talking, and lastly the 18 year old (the one I’ve been targeting in my tests) was very interesting. Whenever I spoke something to her, she gave me her full attention as if we were speaking alone and telling me about her life plans after college lol. Also this same girl gave me very very wide-eye looks when I would speak to her, and definitely held my gaze.

Very interesting night…I underestimated MX302 and will be trying it for the next 2 weekends when I see these same people again.

One thing to note, these results were best achieved after I had resprayed with 1 spray of each. I think the -ienone may have not been too great in this mix and so after that wore off I had better hits. I suspect NaturalAttraction put other mones in it other than -ienone and thus it may be more sexual than IFM was, and thus it might have overplayed my mix. I will not be including it in the mix next week for sure…

24

I just thought I’d give an update to what I think so far of the two different pheromones:

From what I’ve gathered, the difference between MX301 and MX302 seems to be Alpha-nol and Beta-nol according to multiple posts by Steve. So accordingly to that, it seems that MX301 and MX302 are .1a and .5b, not .1a and .1b. If we can get someone to confirm that there is no -none in MX302, then that would make MX302 .1b, but as of yet, I have no reason to suspect MX302 to be .1b because I did not notice the effects of P83 as .1b has that.

So for current purposes, I’m going to judge MX301 and .1a and MX302 as .5b. Also this post from Steve confirms this:

So what does that mean? Well, .1a has the b-nol, and so that leads me to conclude that MX301 contains a more IH social aspect. While .5b has a-nol and thus contains a more IO social aspect. Of course, IH is 70% b-nol and 30% a-nol and IO is 70% a-nol and 30% b-nol, but for these purposes we can just assume it’s a more powerful version of the two. So why is this important? Well, MX301 from the tests I have done so far seems to be a more intimate pheromone. It works well for one-on-one situations, or in closed settings.

MX302 rather is more social. It has more of the resemblance of IO because of that. This one is good in every day situations as well as in closed settings. Now both of these give me the DIHL from girls. They are both equally attracting to women, but the way they do it is slightly different. Experimenting with this is actually fun and spotting the difference is easy.

I still need to do more MX302 testing, but these are my conclusions for now.

The verdict? Buy MX301 and MX302 in the gallons!

A quick re-cap:
MX301 - Sex w/Intimate Attraction - IH b-nol (.1a)
Mx302 - Sex w/Social Attraction - IO a-nol (.5b)

FUN night last night.
25

KIP, you ever ran MX302 solo; is so, what do you think?

Nice reports!

26

I have not yet tested it Solo. The least I’ve tested it with is with IG, and that’s because I believe it helps it work better with younger women. Also because I’ve been testing these pheromones on the same two or three girls, I’m not testing them as much out in the open with others. However I will try it alone soon with others and report back =)

27

Very nice man… We’re targeting the 18 to 24 age group so I might have to give this one a shot. Great journal!

28

Great testing, KIP, reps. MX302 actually did something for me I’ve never had happen before with ANY product I’ve used this morning - will report later.

These two are great. I need to pull my P83 out of the downstairs cupboard and try it with them as well. From my tests with 83 and other MX’s, it does tend to speed up and accentuate the effect the MX is meant to have. I’ve had a few wild nights with MX272 and P83. I don’t doubt things would get nuts adding it to 301/302 :smiley:

29

Yeah, testing P83 with MX302 is very exciting for me. I’ll be trying this combination this coming Saturday with the same girls :slight_smile:

30

Wow great report. Keep us updated. Why doesn’t Androtics sell mx 301/302 in 30ml versions?:confused:

31

Maybe if enough of us jump up and down they might :roll_eyes:

32

Haha I second that. Although it would be expensive. 6 of the To-Go Bottles would be 30ml and that would be $90 for testers or $120 for non-testers. But then again, MX’s are more expensive anyways.

33

My recommendation would be to replace the -ienone with instant openness. I think that -ienone has more to do with female sexual/menstrual cycles, like in IFM and would not have a strong effect on young women who may not yet be fully familiar with their own cycle. I recommend IO because it is so playful, will mix very very well with p83 and will basically turn up their flirt factor a notch…which means hits for you!!!

34

Interesting…Yes I’ve decided to stop using -ienone because of those reasons. I need to test the NaturalAttraction version more by itself before mixing it as it seems different than what IFM used to give me.

As for IO, MX302 if it really is ICM .5b would already contain a fair amount of alpha-nol. But maybe supplementing more of it would help? I don’t have any IO with me right now, but I may decide to try CTTM2 which is 50% alpha 50% beta.

I think I’m going to drop the IG in my next mix. While I do think the IG is a great supplement to the mix, I want to try the effects without it. So my next text will consist of mainly MX302 and P83.

35

What concentration of P83 do you have?

I had trouble with the MX301 - MX302 mixes. I didn’t get obvious responses, it was all too subtle. I ended up switching to my ammo togo and got much improved results. Try adding ammo to the mix maybe?

36

I have 5mcg/spray but test at about 25-35mcg.

Ammo for me never worked to be honest. I rarely got hits and felt that the -none wasn’t buffered enough. I guess we have opposite skin chemistry? haha

37

Huh, that’s interesting.
I use 10mcg per spray with P83, usually 20-30mcg.

Think about this…

By now you are probably getting talked about a lot by these girls. They’re probably gossiping about how cute you are and how they wanna kiss you. Do you know which girl you are going for yet?

38

I think I might try 20mcg. I haven’t tried anything less than 25 so I might give that a go.

As for the girls, yes haha I definitely know my target. But I enjoy the other girls there because they tend to make the target jealous which ups my attraction :wink:

39

Looks like this Saturday may be a no-go for me. But don’t worry, I’ll still be trying it out in other situations :wink: But I won’t be seeing those 3 girls until the 19th :angry:

40

Erp! That’s a long time to wait. Good luck, Romeo!

41

fantastic journal. this definitely sheds some great light on the subject of the 301/302 difference.

a lot of the females i deal with are in the 18-25 range… so the 301 and 302 will definitely be fun to test with.

301 will be in tomorrow or monday. for the rest of the weekend i’m gonna play and do goofy stuff… and probably try out the 302/IG combo (maybe tomorrow night - bar plans and 18+ rave event)

good times ahead!