# MX305-310 Raw Power Test Pack

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [February 18, 2009, 8:46am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214 "2009-02-18T08:46:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![revivia](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/revivia/32/2124_2.png) [@revivia](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/revivia)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 8:46am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/1 "2009-02-18T08:46:34Z")

</div>

Maybe I’m just dumb and don’t know how to count, but isn’t the pack 6 different MX’s? On the details it says its a 5 pack, so I am very confused. 😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![revivia](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/revivia/32/2124_2.png) [@revivia](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/revivia)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 8:52am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/2 "2009-02-18T08:52:18Z")

</div>

305,306,307,308,309,310 = 6 different numbers, so this is the reason for my confusion

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 11:42am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/3 "2009-02-18T11:42:54Z")

</div>

I dont know but i just checked it is alcohol based and comes with game scent…not happy with that and will pass especially in this economy i just cannot afford testing products that keep coming out - scented especially

luckily i still have my oil based unscented raw power.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gone\_with\_the\_Wind](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/gone_with_the_wind/32/2227_2.png) [@Gone\_with\_the\_Wind](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Gone_with_the_Wind)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 1:40pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/4 "2009-02-18T13:40:56Z")

</div>

> [@denec](#):
>
> I dont know but i just checked it is alcohol based and comes with game scent…not happy with that and will pass especially in this economy i just cannot afford testing products that keep coming out scented especially
> 
> luckily i still have my oil based unscented raw power.

There are drawbacks to testing the products scented. The scent of the cover perfume will itself be a confounding factor in reports, as people react differently to different scents. A person may not like something s/he would have otherwise liked because of the cover scent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 2:07pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/5 "2009-02-18T14:07:38Z")

</div>

> [@Gone\_with\_the\_Wind](#):
>
> There are drawbacks to testing the products scented. The scent of the cover perfume will itself be a confounding factor in reports, as people react differently to different scents. A person may not like something s/he would have otherwise liked because of the cover scent.

that is so true scents are so personal, and people can perceive the smell so differently from one person to the other.

myself I have to watch what I spend right now times are really tough and going to be a bit picky what I will spend, I would rather buy raw [pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/) unfragranced and use those for testing, and make my own mixes, then buy any MX with scents. I just do not have any money to burn like I did last year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 4:52pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/6 "2009-02-18T16:52:01Z")

</div>

hmm. Does not say in the description.

Is this an oil or alcohol based pack?

IMHO kinda defeats the purpose if it’s alcohol.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Feel\_Good](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mr.feel_good/32/1148_2.png) [@Mr.Feel\_Good](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Mr.Feel_Good)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 4:56pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/7 "2009-02-18T16:56:21Z")

</div>

> [@marty](#):
>
> hmm. Does not say in the description.
> 
> Is this an oil or alcohol based pack?
> 
> IMHO kinda defeats the purpose if it’s alcohol.

I think they have to be an alcohol based pack… i mean, they’re in to-go bottles, aren’t they? I don’t think that would work so well for oil based.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 5:06pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/8 "2009-02-18T17:06:48Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Feel\_Good](#):
>
> I think they have to be an alcohol based pack… i mean, they’re in to-go bottles, aren’t they? I don’t think that would work so well for oil based.

yep unless the picture does not match, also I am pretty sure Jasmin said they were going to be testing an alcholol based raw power

here is the post

> [@Do we want Raw Power & Dirty?](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/do-we-want-raw-power-dirty/189855/95):
>
> Hehehe, that’s really cute. I’m not near the current office, though. Since Tuesday, I’ve been away researching locations near the same Intel campus that created the new Core and i7 architectures that put them back on top. (yes, that’s right, I want to draw from the same pool of smart people!) Gotta push stuff forward. We need to be in a Ph.D laden area again so we can make something like a new Menlo Park. Something that returns to the better principles Thomas Edison laid out when he created f…

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> And hey, I see someone mentioned NPA. Since we’re held up by the label logistics, anyway, maybe this is good time to release Raw Power in liquid form. Spray-wise, we could try a version based on what we learned from The Great [Androstenone](https://a314.com/product/turn-up-the-heat-tuth/) Experiment 1, maybe have a version a large amount of 83, too (not a version which replaces -none with P83), and then really give things NPA a run for it’s money. 🙂
> 
> [Androstenone](https://a314.com/product/turn-up-the-heat-tuth/) is sticky stuff, and doesn’t really need to be in an oil base. [TAA](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/molecule-a/) is so transient it benefits from being in an oil base, and even [A314](https://a314.com/product/a314-classic/) to some extent for the “mellow release” that lasts a whole work day, but the spray format gives us more flexibility with versioning and ease of experimentation. All things which help to push things forward.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jasmin/32/287_2.png) [@Jasmin](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Jasmin)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 5:07pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/9 "2009-02-18T17:07:46Z")

</div>

Raw Power is not supposed to be fragranced with anything except a tiny bit of musk to project the pheromones a little better. Must’ve been a mix up in communication somewhere.

If this pack came out game fragranced, we’ll dump 'em.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 5:09pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/10 "2009-02-18T17:09:57Z")

</div>

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> Raw Power is not supposed to be fragranced with anything except a tiny bit of musk to project the pheromones a little better. Must’ve been a mix up in communication somewhere.
> 
> If this pack came out game fragranced, we’ll dump 'em.

AWESOME!!!

So does that mean it just the web page is wrong or the batch is made wrong?

I can deal with tiny bit of musk that will go good with almost any cologne

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Feel\_Good](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mr.feel_good/32/1148_2.png) [@Mr.Feel\_Good](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Mr.Feel_Good)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 5:13pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/11 "2009-02-18T17:13:26Z")

</div>

> [@denec](#):
>
> AWESOME!!!

Denec, it’s ok to giggle like a little schoolgirl when things go this right for ya. I know you want to… we won’t judge, i promise 🙄

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jasmin/32/287_2.png) [@Jasmin](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Jasmin)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 5:17pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/12 "2009-02-18T17:17:11Z")

</div>

OK – they do have 5% game in addition to the musk that was supposed to be in there.

This isn’t right. Sorry about this guys! We’ll dump the 6 pack for $19.95 (forum posters only).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 5:17pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/13 "2009-02-18T17:17:42Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Feel\_Good](#):
>
> Denec, it’s ok to giggle like a little schoolgirl when things go this right for ya. I know you want to… we won’t judge, i promise 🙄

I was so happy to see a raw power test pack and said cool…so more interesting testing then i saw game scent…i said no way…i cannot deal with it anymore, and said well i guess will just save my money for something else

so when it turned out to be a mistake yes my eyes light up i admit it, though I feel bad if they lose out money due to a mistake somwhere, i just assumed it was a web mistake not a manufacture lab mistake

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 5:19pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/14 "2009-02-18T17:19:38Z")

</div>

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> OK – they do have 5% game in addition to the musk that was supposed to be in there.
> 
> This isn’t right. Sorry about this guys! We’ll dump the 6 pack for $19.95 (forum posters only).

I will wait for the next one thanks Jasmin for letting us know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jasmin/32/287_2.png) [@Jasmin](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Jasmin)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 5:20pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/15 "2009-02-18T17:20:28Z")

</div>

> [@denec](#):
>
> AWESOME!!!
> 
> So does that mean it just the web page is wrong or the batch is made wrong?
> 
> I can deal with tiny bit of musk that will go good with almost any cologne

Yeah, musks are pretty neutral. Especially the teeny tiny amount we can get away with. Musk molecules are powerful.

Unfortunately, this particular pack does have a little “Game” fragrance. This might be good for some people (it will help to cover the androstenone stink), but it’s not in the design spec for this product, so we’ll get a proper batch done soon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TanSri\_Dato\_aweSOME](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/tansri_dato_awesome/32/320_2.png) [@TanSri\_Dato\_aweSOME](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/TanSri_Dato_aweSOME)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 6:35pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/16 "2009-02-18T18:35:38Z")

</div>

Can’t help, here goes.

Aww man !!! Aww man !!! Aww Mann !!! Aww MAn !!!

Why did it have to come out when i just ordered my stash from the Valentine’s Day promo and intl ship it. It could well come in with my package if it came out earlier. I’d love to test other none base product other than my one and only Ammo. Mx305-310. It’s like 6 x 5ml. at $17 That’s like daylight robbery. Me Holding a gun to APR demanding None [Pheromone](https://a314.com/) at cheap price 🙂 hehehe

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MikeMan22](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikeman22/32/332_2.png) [@MikeMan22](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/MikeMan22)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 7:20pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/17 "2009-02-18T19:20:06Z")

</div>

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> OK – they do have 5% game in addition to the musk that was supposed to be in there.
> 
> This isn’t right. Sorry about this guys! We’ll dump the 6 pack for $19.95 (forum posters only).

I love game scent, dont see why it bugs people!

Also, thanks for changing the price.. Just means ill be able to get more goodies!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikotorocks714](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikotorocks714/32/1509_2.png) [@mikotorocks714](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mikotorocks714)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 8:07pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/18 "2009-02-18T20:07:39Z")

</div>

> [@Jasmin](#):
>
> If this pack came out game fragranced, we’ll dump 'em.

On me!!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![revivia](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/revivia/32/2124_2.png) [@revivia](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/revivia)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 8:23pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/19 "2009-02-18T20:23:54Z")

</div>

I can’t wait to try this test pack out…It’s such a great deal, and I’ll make sure to make some reports with this one! 😃 Thanks a lot Jasmin for the price reduction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnnyPaper](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/johnnypaper/32/338_2.png) [@JohnnyPaper](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/JohnnyPaper)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2009, 8:49pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214/20 "2009-02-18T20:49:58Z")

</div>

Wish I could get it at $19.99…😃

Have fun with the good deal gang!

-JP 🆒

[Next page](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx305-310-raw-power-test-pack/26214.md?page=2)
