# MX307 on the other hand...

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [April 7, 2009, 5:53pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825 "2009-04-07T17:53:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2009, 5:53pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825/1 "2009-04-07T17:53:20Z")

</div>

Seems a bit much. I’m not getting the sexxed up smooth player vibes I got with MX306. I could be having an off day, but here’s what I think so far:

1. I seem to be able to smell the -None a bit more clearly through this. The odd tingly sensation I get with [Ammo](https://a314.com/product/ammo/) is here, as well as a sensation that I could only describe as “warmth.” Not really a good thing, like oh I’m hot, but I just feel “warm” as if I’d been cooking for a while. Like flushed maybe?
2. While I can still smell the “scent package & musk” combo, the -None tinglyness seems to be over powering it.
3. I’m getting a bit of edginess, and I rather tried to avoid dealing with people more than I had to. I was fine doing all the tasks I had to do that didn’t involve people, but I tried to make any interaction with someone on the phone or in person very brief.
4. could be spring allergies starting up, or this mix, but my nose feels real “dried up.” Not stuffed, just dry.

Not much interaction happened at work today, but something notable was when both of my bosses started cursing loudly about one of our clients (client wasn’t there, thankfully). Not very usual for them to really get to that point.

This is only try #1, but over about 4 hours, it’s impressed me less in every way thus far compared to MX306. Whereas MX306 was hot and bothered, yet smooth and buttery, MX307 is just vaguely bothered.

If I had to guess, I’d say the amount of Anone in this one has increased.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2009, 1:54am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825/2 "2009-04-08T01:54:36Z")

</div>

Yeah, I’m thinking this is just “more” none. If that’s what you want, and what you can handle, then this’ll be great for you. For me, it was getting a little borderline throughout the day at 1 spray. Feeling a bit rough, and raw all by it’s lonesome. Maybe reminds me more of TUTH?

Not overkill and into OD mode, as I was still able to eck out fine with people, but I always felt a bit “Fight or flight”-ey ness going on. So a bit more than I’d personally like. You -aNone lovers might get more bang for your buck on this one.

Then again, who knows, maybe I’m misreading it entirely.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![djandarial](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/djandarial/32/1667_2.png) [@djandarial](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/djandarial)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2009, 9:56am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825/3 "2009-04-08T09:56:52Z")

</div>

Thanks for the report, this and the one on MX292 were selling points for me.

Appreciated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MHarris](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mharris/32/2107_2.png) [@MHarris](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/MHarris)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2009, 12:29pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825/4 "2009-04-11T12:29:32Z")

</div>

Thanks for the great feedback.

MX307 has the same amount of androstenone as everything else does in the test pack. Only the accessory [pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/shop/) change in each mix.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikotorocks714](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikotorocks714/32/1509_2.png) [@mikotorocks714](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mikotorocks714)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2009, 1:08pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825/5 "2009-04-11T13:08:51Z")

</div>

Hm, must be the accessories or (steerer pheromones) acting as puppeteers then.

As Jas mentioned once:

> [@How can there be a Raw Power test pack spray when Raw Power was an oil?](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/how-can-there-be-a-raw-power-test-pack-spray-when-raw-power-was-an-oil/26201/16):
>
> We’re testing the version of androstenone which won our “Great Androstenone Experiment” as the new Raw Power spray.
> 
> The one that won was androstenone with added TAF. That was easily the crowd favorite out of the original experiment.
> 
> That’s what I can say right now about the Raw Power test pack. The other versions in the test pack some of the newer molecules along with that base.
> 
> As always, the exact formula in contained in each bottle will not be initially revealed (blind). However, we’re open to revealing what’s in each one after get enough feedback.

So TAF, -none, and who knows?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MHarris](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mharris/32/2107_2.png) [@MHarris](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/MHarris)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2009, 1:12pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825/6 "2009-04-11T13:12:23Z")

</div>

> [@marty](#):
>
> Seems a bit much.

From your description from a “bit much” to thinking this had extra -none in it, would MX307 most closely match the label “[Raw Power](https://a314.com/product/raw-power/)” for you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2009, 3:32pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825/7 "2009-04-11T15:32:19Z")

</div>

Yes I would, but I need to test it another time or two to determine if that’s actually a good thing. I really didn’t have a great environment to judge the response of any females, but from the self effects it felt like the “aggression” factor of -anone shone through more. I found myself getting a bit irritated and short with people if I wasn’t working hard to keep it in check.

With MX306 I felt like I had a very powerful alpha vibe, with lots of sexual attention, but without much of the “stress” -anone usually causes in myself and other males. I was the go to guy without any question, looked up to, flirted with, etc. Basically all the “power” you’d expect from this mix without the “raw.”

So of the first three, MX306 is currently in the lead, but I intend to give MX307 a few more runs before making a final decision.

Thanks for the clarification on the composition of these. I wasn’t sure if you guys were trying to just find the “proper” taf/none ratio, or if you were also testing to find the “ideal” amount of -anone for a spray version.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/denec/32/1730_2.png) [@denec](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/denec)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2009, 4:07pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825/8 "2009-04-11T16:07:12Z")

</div>

> [@MHarris](#):
>
> Thanks for the great feedback.
> 
> MX307 has the same amount of androstenone as everything else does in the test pack. Only the accessory pheromones change in each mix.

I never purchased the original The [Raw Power](https://a314.com/product/raw-power/) test pack because it had a scent and waiting for it to be released again but I have a few questions:

What is really the difference between Raw Power test pack from Turn up the heat?

From what I understand Turn Up the heat is none + added accessory pheros as well to help steer it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikotorocks714](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikotorocks714/32/1509_2.png) [@mikotorocks714](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mikotorocks714)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2009, 9:36pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825/9 "2009-04-11T21:36:00Z")

</div>

I know, it’s weird but there IS a difference. Simply amazing, to say the least as it is more noticeable in the good side of -none than TUTH. TUTH is good, but you can really feel the “power” of -none in this test pack so far from what I’ve tested. Where as with TUTH you (at least me) don’t really feel the self effects of the -none as you do with this stuff; with this stuff you definitely feel the confidence, aggressiveness. and sexual side of -none. In other words it makes you feel freaking sexy (like if you’re hot shit) ha, ha.

> [@denec](#):
>
> I never purchased the original The Raw Power test pack because it had a scent and waiting for it to be released again but I have a few questions:
> 
> What is really the difference between Raw Power test pack from Turn up the heat?
> 
> From what I understand Turn Up the heat is none + added accessory pheros as well to help steer it?
