# MX307 on the other hand...

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [April 7, 2009, 5:53pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825 "2009-04-07T17:53:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikotorocks714](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mikotorocks714/32/1509_2.png) [@mikotorocks714](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mikotorocks714)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2009, 1:08pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825/5 "2009-04-11T13:08:51Z")

</div>

Hm, must be the accessories or (steerer pheromones) acting as puppeteers then.

As Jas mentioned once:

> [@How can there be a Raw Power test pack spray when Raw Power was an oil?](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/how-can-there-be-a-raw-power-test-pack-spray-when-raw-power-was-an-oil/26201/16):
>
> We’re testing the version of androstenone which won our “Great Androstenone Experiment” as the new Raw Power spray.
> 
> The one that won was androstenone with added TAF. That was easily the crowd favorite out of the original experiment.
> 
> That’s what I can say right now about the Raw Power test pack. The other versions in the test pack some of the newer molecules along with that base.
> 
> As always, the exact formula in contained in each bottle will not be initially revealed (blind). However, we’re open to revealing what’s in each one after get enough feedback.

So TAF, -none, and who knows?

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx307-on-the-other-hand/27825)._