# MX353 review and the big bang theory... **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [May 26, 2010, 2:11am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874 "2010-05-26T02:11:55Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 11\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![JohnnyHard](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/johnnyhard/32/1753_2.png) [@JohnnyHard](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/JohnnyHard)\ **Post date:** [May 26, 2010, 2:11am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/1 "2010-05-26T02:11:55Z")
**Best quantity:** 3 sprays **Scent:** Very bad, smells like a cheap granny parfum. Extremely penetrating and sadly also long lasting… **Self Effects:** The first one hour I am very nervous, confused and sensitive, there is something that I don’t know, probably a feminine phero, later more to it. After one hour if the downside is gone and I am more upbeat, I call it the hunting time, the lust to seduction. **Effects on others:** MX353 is inconstant, the reason behind this, is the fact that is only hits in the short range, very short range, maximal 5 inch between you and the target. But when it hits, it hits better than everything else. It’s a really love bang. I think that there is one phero to do that extremely impression. This one unknown phero make the music and all the rest are only supporter and or bring the target to do what the feels. I think for it on [P83](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/p83/) and TAH or TAC for the hits out of the blue. I reckon that the secret is P96, I don’t test it but what I read about it is exactly these reaction. The only other possibility is P88 but it should be much more sexual. P86 and none is clear. MX353 works best on the 20 - 35 age group. With older women I have better results with NPA, it’s only sexual without a lot of carry-on. But if I think about that, I must say MX353 is sexy, sexual and especially romantically, when it hits. Male reaction are either ghosting, or in the first moment confused or upbeat and funny. Composite, MX353 is the perfect mix for specific moments (dates) and seduction, whereby, MX353 is more selecting the target for you. For social proof, consistency, fun and action I prefer MX301. For the bed time Action NPA with P83 and some TAC. ---
**Author:** ![Maidenfan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Maidenfan01](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Maidenfan01)\ **Post date:** [May 26, 2010, 3:06am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/2 "2010-05-26T03:06:11Z")
The scent has grown on me. Good review! I haven’t really had any great results with it personally. ---
**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\ **Post date:** [May 26, 2010, 4:27am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/3 "2010-05-26T04:27:09Z")
> [@JohnnyHard](#): > > For the bed time Action NPA with P83 and some TAC. Have you tested that combo enough to share your recipe, JohnnyH? Thanks! ---
**Author:** ![extremetestosterone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ea5d25/32.png) [@extremetestosterone](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/extremetestosterone)\ **Post date:** [May 26, 2010, 7:26am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/4 "2010-05-26T07:26:30Z")
> [@](#): > > The scent has grown on me Same here. I have actually gotten a lot of compliments on how fresh and clean I smell when wearing 353. Never tried P88, but I am hoping to soon. Warren has dubbed it “The urge to merge.” I don’t know if you read that post, but it’s a good one…definately recommended. As far as consistancy is concerned try adding 2 drops of A314. Wildflower said in his journal that the addition of A314 makes it a little more consistant. Anyway, keep us posted. ---
**Author:** ![JohnnyHard](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/johnnyhard/32/1753_2.png) [@JohnnyHard](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/JohnnyHard)\ **Post date:** [May 26, 2010, 7:00pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/5 "2010-05-26T19:00:17Z")
> [@extremetestosterone](#): > > Same here. I have actually gotten a lot of compliments on how fresh and clean I smell when wearing 353. Never tried P88, but I am hoping to soon. Warren has dubbed it “The urge to merge.” I don’t know if you read that post, but it’s a good one…definately recommended. As far as consistancy is concerned try adding 2 drops of A314. Wildflower said in his journal that the addition of A314 makes it a little more consistant. Anyway, keep us posted. Yes, I read Warren’s great post and I am also hope to test P88 but I am think it’s P96 in MX353. I never tried it with A314… ---
**Author:** ![JohnnyHard](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/johnnyhard/32/1753_2.png) [@JohnnyHard](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/JohnnyHard)\ **Post date:** [May 26, 2010, 7:06pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/6 "2010-05-26T19:06:25Z")
> [@M\_M](#): > > Have you tested that combo enough to share your recipe, JohnnyH? > > Thanks! 2 or 3 drops NPA, dilute with perfume and 40-50mcg [P83](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/p83/) and 5-10mcg TAC and the fire is burn… I have no TAH but that’s must be a killer combo… With 40-50mcg P86 it’s also a visual experience… 😛 ---
**Author:** ![Pagodeiro](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/pagodeiro/32/1226_2.png) [@Pagodeiro](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Pagodeiro)\ **Post date:** [May 26, 2010, 11:48pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/7 "2010-05-26T23:48:57Z")
> [@JohnnyHard](#): > > the reason behind this, is the fact that is only hits in the short range, very short range, maximal 5 inch between you and the target. Johnny i´ve seen it working up to a meter. Best hits were when the target and i´ve been standing shoulder on shoulder or when i was hugged by a girl Pago ---
**Author:** ![JohnnyHard](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/johnnyhard/32/1753_2.png) [@JohnnyHard](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/JohnnyHard)\ **Post date:** [May 27, 2010, 8:11pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/8 "2010-05-27T20:11:52Z")
> [@Pagodeiro](#): > > Johnny i´ve seen it working up to a meter. > > Best hits were when the target and i´ve been standing shoulder on shoulder or when i was hugged by a girl > > Pago Can we agree on that’s half a meter? 😃😛 Yes, that’s also my experiences… ---
**Author:** ![developingperfectionist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b9bd4f/32.png) [@developingperfectionist](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/developingperfectionist)\ **Post date:** [May 28, 2010, 2:37am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/9 "2010-05-28T02:37:13Z")
Amusing, one of the responses about MX353 is that it’s one of the most consistent sprays… hah. Tough to say. ---
**Author:** ![floydianone](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/floydianone/32/2301_2.png) [@floydianone](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/floydianone)\ **Post date:** [May 28, 2010, 7:07pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/10 "2010-05-28T19:07:31Z")
> [@extremetestosterone](#): > > As far as consistancy is concerned try adding 2 drops of A314. Wildflower said in his journal that the addition of A314 makes it a little more consistant. Anyway, keep us posted. hey extremeT, do you recall what page of Wildflower’s journal that he mentioned this? I haven’t been able to find it. Sucks that I don’t have a computer right now and all I have is my phone for internet. Takes forever to scan through. Thanks ---
**Author:** ![extremetestosterone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ea5d25/32.png) [@extremetestosterone](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/extremetestosterone)\ **Post date:** [May 29, 2010, 7:00pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-review-and-the-big-bang-theory/38874/11 "2010-05-29T19:00:44Z")
> [@](#): > > hey extremeT, do you recall what page of Wildflower’s journal that he mentioned this? I haven’t been able to find it. Sucks that I don’t have a computer right now and all I have is my phone for internet. Takes forever to scan through. > Thanks Shit…you know what? Maybe he didn’t write it in his journal. He may have just wrote that in a MX353 thread. Although I did find this on page 30 > [@](#): > > I’ve also always got my best hits from MX292 when combining it with A314