# New Innovative (probably not, but still new:)) testing ideas **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [January 19, 2008, 3:18am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/new-innovative-probably-not-but-still-new-testing-ideas/8432 "2008-01-19T03:18:17Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![mockingbird](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/mockingbird/32/1790_2.png) [@mockingbird](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mockingbird)\ **Post date:** [January 19, 2008, 3:18am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/new-innovative-probably-not-but-still-new-testing-ideas/8432/1 "2008-01-19T03:18:17Z")
I have been putting together some new ways to test androtics product, trying to reach the potential of pheros and also satisfy any curiosity about them. Here are a few ideas that I will put in practice very soon. Pheros on paper, literally šŸ™„ . I am pretty sure that paper will reduce diffusion rate, but not as much as clothes. So it will probably slow down the fast evaporation of certain products, and make it last longer. Some testing materials can be: letters (even if it is kind of unpopular, it is still a good way to test), holiday/special occasion cards that you offer to people, printed research paper for anyone in college (with mx102 for respect from professors šŸ˜ƒ ). I also want to test the time of exposure it takes for different products to achieve results. Like how fast instant openness get people to open up, or the number of minutes for turn up the heat to agitate others, or the time elapsed before getting a first smile after exposure. ---
**Author:** ![LizzieM](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/lizziem/32/218_2.png) [@LizzieM](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/LizzieM)\ **Post date:** [January 19, 2008, 12:03pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/new-innovative-probably-not-but-still-new-testing-ideas/8432/2 "2008-01-19T12:03:47Z")
Good to know someone is properly pursuing this. Iā€™m going to lace all my future papers to be submitted with [pheromones](https://a314.com/shop/). In fact, I recently did it with a few letters that i submitted, but i donā€™t think that counts, since it was IS/A (thatā€™s the only phero i have at that point of time).. An idea iā€™m trying to pursue is to lace my exam papers with pheros. I havenā€™t yet any idea how to execute this properly, since I canā€™t just spray it during exam hours. Nor do I think it will be effective if I spray it on my hands and then wipe it. My exams range from 3-4 hour papers, so the pheromones on my hand will probably be gone by the time I finish the paper and try to wipe pheromones on the paper. Iā€™ve found a better idea, maybe. Iā€™m thinking of putting it on a corked bottle, and pass it off as a perfume pendant. When I want to lace my paper, all I have to do is wipe on top of the cork (which will be wet due to diffusion), and then wipe it across the paper. Diffusion will also probably be much faster šŸ†’ ---
**Author:** ![tisha23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@tisha23](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tisha23)\ **Post date:** [January 19, 2008, 1:54pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/new-innovative-probably-not-but-still-new-testing-ideas/8432/3 "2008-01-19T13:54:11Z")
Great experiment. Surprise I have a opinion on this LOL šŸ˜› (what else is new, right LOL) I think with some products like nols, Instant Shine and [Instant Female Magic](https://a314.com/product/instant-female-magic/) it works well. Letters I am not so sure only because by the time they get to the destination the pheromones may have all diffused already. May make the mailcarrier happy though LOL If your hand delivering the card it could work to a extent. I find from experience there is a difference though. I use Instant Shine to make my crappy boss more upbeat and happy. I dont always spray it on me though. I will spray were ever he is at. His chair, desk ect ā€¦ Now I see a uplifting mood in him when I do this but he dosnt associate that to me. Its more like a self effect for him. When I wear it its different he associated the feeling to me and chats and jokes more with me. Instant Female Magic certain times of the month I spray my supervisors cloth desk chair with it. She has been alot more pleasant to eveyone. I dont wear it though. Turn Up The Heat makes me horny in the bottle or on a man. Plain and simple. If my husband is not around and I smell it I get aroused and the only reason I associate it to him is because he is who I have sex with LOL. My friend uses it and I find it arousing but not in a sense that I will drop my morals and do him. So if you use it on a object like say the paper they will become aroused but not associate that arousal to you. Look forward to your results šŸ˜‰ Tisha ---
**Author:** ![Gone\_with\_the\_Wind](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/gone_with_the_wind/32/2227_2.png) [@Gone\_with\_the\_Wind](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Gone_with_the_Wind)\ **Post date:** [January 19, 2008, 2:15pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/new-innovative-probably-not-but-still-new-testing-ideas/8432/4 "2008-01-19T14:15:52Z")
> [@tisha23](#): > > ā€¦So if you use it on a object like say the paper they will become aroused but not associate that arousal to you. A problem worthy of consideration. How to force an association between the scent of an object and a particular individual. One way is if itā€™s something they know is yours. For instance, you leave your jacket at someoneā€™s house. They know it is yours because it is distinctive and theyā€™ve seen you in it many times. Plus they have the problem of notifying you and getting it back to you, so the association between the jacket and you is reinforced when they think those thoughts having both subjects. A letter may be similar, in that it comes from someone known, and that person is thought about when reading and smelling the contents. An academic paper is somewhat different in that it is probably in a stack of other such papers, and the grader may be in an abstracted state when reading the papers. Perhaps the grader may not even note the names on the papers being graded, thus making an association between the [pheromone](https://a314.com/shop/) signature and the writer of the paper unlikely. One way to encourage the association between the pheromone signature of objects (like academic papers) and an individual might be the use of a distinctive signature scent. If you have a distinctive perfume or cologne people will start to associate it with you. Then if they smell that scent on a term paper they will associate the paper with you. In fact, if they smell it on a whole pile of papers, as they probably will, they will still associate the smell and the pheromone signature with you, even if they donā€™t get to reading your paper and seeing your name for some time. ---
**Author:** ![tisha23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@tisha23](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tisha23)\ **Post date:** [January 19, 2008, 2:52pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/new-innovative-probably-not-but-still-new-testing-ideas/8432/5 "2008-01-19T14:52:30Z")
> [@](#): > > A letter may be similar, in that it comes from someone known, and that person is thought about when reading and smelling the contents. Being a letter carrier I need to distinguish the statement ā€œthe letterā€ . I am thinking if its like a card you hand deliver then it could work. If its one that goā€™s though the US mail not so sure. At least 20 people handle that letter before it makes it to its destination. Thats not counting the automated machinery which will spray its own mist of this sticky oil substance not detectable to the touch to help the mail go through the machines smoother. I just think by the time it got there it would be so handled it wouldnt work or be very subtle. Plus its against postal regulations to spray perfume on mail. we are supposed to hand it in so they can return it. Magizines with perfume samples have to be shrink wrapped. I think like you mention a personal item would help associate the feeling to you like a jacket or something. Sig scent is a good idea for those who wear just one scent all the time. Hell I change mine half way through the day sometimes LOL. Tisha ---
**Author:** ![LizzieM](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/lizziem/32/218_2.png) [@LizzieM](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/LizzieM)\ **Post date:** [January 20, 2008, 2:25pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/new-innovative-probably-not-but-still-new-testing-ideas/8432/6 "2008-01-20T14:25:21Z")
Well I hand deliver all my assignments. Problem comes during exams, CV submission and internship applications then.. **Problems in using Pheromones in Exams** 1. Pheromone signature would not likely last; (would spraying it inside the booklet and keeping it clamped shut help? Then the first attack would be to the examiner) 2. itā€™s hard to associate the smell with me (however, would it matter if Iā€™m looking for an excellent grade, and would just like an ā€œiā€™m knowledgeableā€ vibe wafting while he/sheā€™s marking the paper? I figured itā€™d be useful in a law exam, where usually I totally write messily and it all depends on the lecturerā€™s impression of what you write and how intelligent you come across) By the way, usually my law exam marks are totally unpredictable, which is why sometimes I make an effort to get them remarked. My answers are usually great, but with the short amount of time theyā€™re allocated to mark papers, sometimes they merely run through my paper looking for keywords, or sometimes they may just mark them low because I write messily and possibly does not give a very ā€œcalm and intelligentā€ vibe (who can when youā€™re spouting 20+ pages in 3 hours?) This is where I thought pheromones would be a good idea, because although they wouldnā€™t connect it with me, theyā€™d necessarily connect the ā€œrespectā€ vibe theyā€™re getting with the author of the paper. ---
**Author:** ![Gone\_with\_the\_Wind](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/gone_with_the_wind/32/2227_2.png) [@Gone\_with\_the\_Wind](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Gone_with_the_Wind)\ **Post date:** [January 20, 2008, 2:47pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/new-innovative-probably-not-but-still-new-testing-ideas/8432/7 "2008-01-20T14:47:34Z")
> [@LizzieM](#): > > ā€¦ My answers are usually great, but with the short amount of time theyā€™re allocated to mark papers, sometimes they merely run through my paper looking for keywords, or sometimes they may just mark them low because I write messily and possibly does not give a very ā€œcalm and intelligentā€ vibe (who can when youā€™re spouting 20+ pages in 3 hours?)ā€¦ Thinking back to the years I spent grading student papers, I graded on the communication of ideas. If I couldnā€™t make out the idea due to bad handwriting I viewed the attempt at communication as flawed. Others might see it differently, but if you have to communicate through handwriting some time developing that skill may be time well spent. Trading off some quantity of text for some legibility may be a good trade. Just my thoughts, and possibly not applicable to your unique situation. Take them for what they are worth. ---
**Author:** ![LizzieM](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/lizziem/32/218_2.png) [@LizzieM](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/LizzieM)\ **Post date:** [January 20, 2008, 3:12pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/new-innovative-probably-not-but-still-new-testing-ideas/8432/8 "2008-01-20T15:12:06Z")
> [@Gone\_with\_the\_Wind](#): > > Thinking back to the years I spent grading student papers, I graded on the communication of ideas. If I couldnā€™t make out the idea due to bad handwriting I viewed the attempt at communication as flawed. My answers are definitely legible, only messy. šŸ˜› šŸ™„ Very messy actually. I guess I definitely need to work on that. I donā€™t get lecturers who insist on us writing hundreds and hundreds of pages. Itā€™s killing me ā˜¹.