# Not Experienced Enough to Test Mx388 & mx389 **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [November 11, 2010, 12:02pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/not-experienced-enough-to-test-mx388-mx389/43238 "2010-11-11T12:02:01Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![GorMas2020](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/gormas2020/32/197_2.png) [@GorMas2020](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/GorMas2020)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2010, 12:02pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/not-experienced-enough-to-test-mx388-mx389/43238/1 "2010-11-11T12:02:01Z")
I came to the conclusion after a couple run ins with mx388 that my testing skills are very poor. I am going to keep testing and do a full report on both MX388 and MX389 at a later date. I’m guessing that if both are straight -none and I’m having a hard time telling what are and aren’t hits with MX388 that testing MX389 and being able to tell a subtle difference is out of the question for my skill set. I’m also wondering that my body may be producing enough -none on its own so without the steering molecules in the Instant Line Products I’m having a hard time reading straight -none hits as it pertains to testing subtleties. Going to have to shelve the MX388 and MX389 for awhile and hone my testing skills before jumping back in. Maybe a good -none overdose is needed to help me better understand subtleties!?!?!? ---
**Author:** ![P51Mustang](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/p51mustang/32/1266_2.png) [@P51Mustang](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/P51Mustang)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2010, 3:41pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/not-experienced-enough-to-test-mx388-mx389/43238/2 "2010-11-11T15:41:08Z")
I was going to say and try and OD on and see if there are any differences. If your testing is being skewed because you think your perception is off, then I would just use it around people you have a baseline with. IE if you know someone has their period, make sure you can see them twice in a row, and expose them to 15mcgs of both split packs. Base your reports on how many times you get slapped. If you can’t get baseline reactions and you feel nothing is still there, buffer with an Instant line, but keep Instant Line dosage consistent throughout the testing. I wasn’t noticing any result with one of the -nol test pack MX’s until one day I had A314 on and for some reason a switch was turned on. Weirder things have happened. Plus who knows, maybe there aren’t big differences? ---
**Author:** ![jessejester](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jessejester/32/1683_2.png) [@jessejester](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jessejester)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2010, 5:55pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/not-experienced-enough-to-test-mx388-mx389/43238/3 "2010-11-11T17:55:26Z")
> [@GorMas2020](#): > > I came to the conclusion after a couple run ins with mx388 that my testing skills are very poor. I am going to keep testing and do a full report on both MX388 and MX389 at a later date. I’m guessing that if both are straight -none and I’m having a hard time telling what are and aren’t hits with MX388 that testing MX389 and being able to tell a subtle difference is out of the question for my skill set. I’m also wondering that my body may be producing enough -none on its own so without the steering molecules in the Instant Line Products I’m having a hard time reading straight -none hits as it pertains to testing subtleties. **Going to have to shelve the MX388 and MX389 for awhile and hone my testing skills before jumping back in.** Maybe a good -none overdose is needed to help me better understand subtleties!?!?!? I honestly think this is the wrong idea. How are you going to learn what the subtlties are if you stop testing it? What are you going to test that gives you more experience noticing strait -none hits without using a strait -none product? This is what testing single molecules is all about. Testing it until you see something out of the ordinary. It may take that whole bottle before you see something. Damn, I cant even tell you how many bottles of P79 I went through before I caught on what it was doing for me. If you are really interested in testing single molecules, do not give up on them. I realize you have only been at this testing thing for a few months now…but this is how you learn how to test man. Im sure you have seen -none hits at this point with other products. Take a minute and read the sticky that talks about body language, then spray 1 shot (2.5mcgs -none) on yourself and go have some fun. Dont stress if you dont see anything. Moreover, come back and report that you have seen nothing. It could be useful info. You never know. I will admit…its early in your phero journey for single molecules, but if this is something you are really going to be interested in…you are going to have to start sometime. I’m happy to see some of the newer guys jumping in and taking the time to report on some of this stuff. Keep it up. Oh, and to make you feel better, I have been at this testing thing for almost 2 years now. I have tested so many single molecules/MX’s that I cant even count. I am currently testing MX388 and MX389 and I am not having the easiest of times noticing things either. Chances are really good I will need to get my hands on another pack before I can give substantial data on them and their differences. Moral of the story…DON’T GIVE UP.🙂 ---
**Author:** ![GorMas2020](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/gormas2020/32/197_2.png) [@GorMas2020](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/GorMas2020)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2010, 8:13pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/not-experienced-enough-to-test-mx388-mx389/43238/4 "2010-11-11T20:13:01Z")
Thanx for the input guys… jesse your right how can you better understand -none than testing -none itself. I was trying to find something so badly that I probably missed a lot. Either way the testing is going to commence so at least I can figure out what type of mone user I actually wanna be.