# P75 ... Oi!!!

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/p75-oi/328>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [May 2, 2006, 2:58am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/p75-oi/328 "2006-05-02T02:58:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 26

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Socrates](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/3bc359/32.png) [@Socrates](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Socrates)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2007, 8:14am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/p75-oi/328/26 "2007-08-07T08:14:55Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Originally Posted by Socrates
> 
> Instant Female Magic question?  
> MHarris (17 April 2006):  
> “…P75 and P76, too, if they prove to be useful, may be very sexual or at least attention getting…”
> 
> P74  
> MHarris (19 April 2006):  
> “… P75 and P76, if they end up acting pheromonally in a generative manner, may actually end up being stronger than androstenone… so caution should be exercised. I’d start very low with these.”
> 
> P74  
> MHarris (19 April 2006):  
> "…I know nothing definite about them P75 and P76 ] at all. That’s why they’re putative, after all.
> 
> These are just educated hunches based on their place in the metabolic chain, structure, and location on the body.
> 
> When I start to see a pattern emerge with over similar results from a good numbers of testers/users (40+ correlations is good), things get less amorphous and far more definite."
> 
> Suggestions for MHarris regarding future putative pheromones  
> MHarris (29 April 2006):  
> “…P75 and P76 may end up being pro-sexual in a strong, overt manner, like androstenone.”
> 
> Suggestions for MHarris regarding future putative pheromones  
> MHarris (30 April 2006):  
> “…If I found the next great super, dripping hot monkey sex pheromone like androstenone, then I’d be quite happy with that (and partly what P75 and P76 are attempts at)…If you want genital area pheromones, definitely check out P75 and P76. There may be some more in the test putative series, too.”
> 
> P75 … Oi!!!  
> MHarris (2 May 2006):  
> “…Go low with P75 through P77.”
> 
> P75 … Oi!!!  
> MHarris (6 May 2006):  
> “…To other who want to test the putatives: I recommend the lowest dosage we sell for P75 to P77, until more is known about them. Caution is the order of the day with complete unknowns…”

P74  
MHarris (19 March 2006):  
"…At the moment, I’m actually blind to them all. (i.e., I don’t what #s go with what pheromone)…

There’s two, that if they are pheromones, would probably have OD characteristics quite like -none. I suppose I should find out which ones those are, so you can be extra cautious with them (they’re also truly interesting molecules that really pique my own interest)

Otherwise, 25mcg-50mcg should be a quick ‘sorter’ for the other ones, if you’re after speed."

P74  
MHarris (20 March 2006):  
Quote:  
Originally Posted by catlord17  
Yes, please, do tell! What are you basing this speculation on, and what other speculative qualities might they have? Or would that be poisoning the well,so to speak?

"I suppose it won’t hurt too much.

They excite me due to their larger than natural presence in the head sweat of men predominantly rated as typical “sexy” by women. (the presence in head sweat being a major clue that they may be pheromones)

I’ll find out which two they are on Monday, and let you know. If I don’t post it right away, just bump this thread by asking again."

Suggestions for MHarris regarding future putative mones  
MHarris (29 April 2006):  
“…Just because a potential pheromone is found in the head sweat of brutally sexy men, doesn’t mean it’s not found in their “genital sweat”, as well…”

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/p75-oi/328)._