Steve recommended me this one in my journal… and let me tell you its a real killer of a molecule. Granted I have only tested it briefly, it is results are pretty obvious, although it seems to not effect everyone as widely as some other molecules.
I have tested between 2.5 mcgs to 15mcgs.
Effects are noticeable at 7.5mcgs. Adding more does not seem to make it any better. This was actually the dosage recommended to me by Steve. Olfact mentioned this being a good dosage too.
Self effects:
None really, at least none that I am aware of.
Effects on others:
It seems that others tend to laugh at just about everything I say that is even remotely funny. Biggest hit I’ve seen from it was I said something that really wasn’t all that funny in class but the girl next to me interpreted it in a way that made it funny and laughed at it. Its pretty consistent in this regard.
It also definitely has attractive qualities to it, one on one interactions are an absolute joy while wearing this one. I think that the funny man effect is actually a side effect of the attractiveness that this mone puts off. However its hard to pin point what exactly makes it so attractive.
A tiny smidgen of straight -none works great with it and greatly increases some IOI’s you might see while wearing it. I wouldn’t personally wear more than 2.5mcgs though. You want just a hint of that -none masculinity, but any more seems to kill the vibe of the P91. May be able to go higher with more buffers, but I have not tested it.
Pairing shine or IO may be unneeded with this molecule. I bet beta-nol would work pretty well, but I haven’t gotten a chance to test really.
Next on my list is P80 testing, lets see what happens!
Edit:
A thought just popped into my head.. I bet this would work great in the ICM mixes maybe even replacing P93. I wonder if ICM 2.0 will have it?
It really is a FANTASTIC molecule for social lubing your situation. I find it to be nearly identical to MX297 with a bit of TAF added in for hit focusing potential. I also would say that its identical or near identical to TAH.
Over the past year I have been matching and side by side testing Putatives next to other putatives and have compiled a large database of potential matches. I’m also at a stage where I have been testing raw molecules (named) to putatives. The Virgo in me is a real perfectionist and it drives me crazy when I don’t know how things work.
I will not release any of my findings other than a snippet here or there of potential Putative matches as my goal is knowledge and in no way to undermine or hurt AD. My life is centered and focused on helping make this world a happy one. It just wouldn’t fit in with my plans. Please do not ask for my research as only one other person shares it with me, Dancing Joker, but he has mentored me from the very beginning of my joining the forum.
I will say that I have taken P91 into consideration in applying to the ICM 2.0. It really adds a nice synergy to it with the heavy -NONE signature. There’s one other molecule that seems to not play well with it at this time. Something about it that tilts the balance a little towards goofy. Goofy sexual doesn’t mesh right for me.
I’m super glad you enjoyed testing it and would love to read more of your thoughts of P91 / TAH and MX297 on a side by side comparison
I can see a goofy sexual vibe from this for sure. I don’t have TAH other wise I would try it out. As far as MX297, I could see P91 being in it. I’ll have to revisit it. I can see some 297ish traits from P91 when I don’t combine it with -none.
I was saying this more along the lines of that when I was testing this stuff I got wore out. That has never happened before to me during testing…granted I haven’t been testing long. It could have been just how that week was going.
I may have to test this in a more social situation, cause I got good results my 1st couple tests… then a couple sub par tests IMO. My last test though was a laugh fest so I can see that goofy portion. I didn’t personally get anything sexual from it, but you have to look at the scenarios I was testing in also.
You say that P91 makes you appear funnier.. I am interested in this because, although i have a good sense of humor, i feel like my dates could be on the lighter side of things if you know what i mean.
Has anyone else here felt this effect? Im a newbie so i wont be playin with it too soon ( gots TONS of other toys to try out )
but still… big reps to you Maidenfan
Hate to burst your bubble, but testing putatives with so many other variables doesn’t mean a thing. That is unless you have run the full spectrum of testing the putative all by itself.
Yeah I know… I wasn’t doing this to test. I was just doing it really to spice up my night(The unexpected). I wasn’t even thinking it was similar at all besides the P91 and -none inside of MX389… P92 was just what I have been testing so thought what the hell.
I will say this I think I learned something about P92 during this though, but thats gonna go in my journal.
About the night… Wasn’t expecting much and there wasn’t much going on…got some respect hits and this definitely didn’t make me talk much. I kept to myself. Still cracked some jokes yet not as many as I normally do. Could have used some shine or IO, but this wasn’t really for research purposes
Self effects where more prevalent than anything. Felt in charge and self assured. Not sure if any hits I saw where because of my actions or the mones, will test again.
Mrdimes asked me an opinion regarding P91 by PM. “Why not share with the rest of the class,” I says to myself. I have it a 5 mcg per spray. Have for some time. Takes me awhile to get the feel for a molecule. Some times 6+ months. 10 mcg seemed too much. Maybe 5 mcg is not quite enough. 2.5 does seem adequate for a steering effect. 1.0 micros will produce at least some self effect.
I agree with JohnnyHard. It is Mr. Energizer. Makes me talkative. I can see some limited comparison to IG and TAA. I cannot see a comparison to TAH. TAH is ultra-femme, the primary mone in Instant Sexiness. If TAH is Marilyn Monroe, P91 would have to be cross-dressing Marilyn. Molecule H is what women wear to feel more kittenish. I can’t addresss the TAH-P91-MX297 comparison. Kimba is the resident 297-Phile.
TAH would be a major component in gay mixes? Or minor buffering in masculine mixes. Hope that answers your query, Mr D.
I defer to Kimba, JH, Pago and others for further comment. They know about P83, P91, etc.
)
