# Pherobomb is an apt name for what is otherwise known as MX292

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pherobomb-is-an-apt-name-for-what-is-otherwise-known-as-mx292/61038>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [February 2, 2014, 2:42pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pherobomb-is-an-apt-name-for-what-is-otherwise-known-as-mx292/61038 "2014-02-02T14:42:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WildFlower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/wildflower/32/1260_2.png) [@WildFlower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/WildFlower)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2014, 9:49pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pherobomb-is-an-apt-name-for-what-is-otherwise-known-as-mx292/61038/13 "2014-02-06T21:49:23Z")

</div>

> [@JohnnyHard](#):
>
> I think I know why you get other effects, I read your report back then, you used batch 2 (got many disappointing feedback in contrast). Your superb post reminds me on the legendary batch 1 and batch 4. I never used MX292, but I read everything about it.
> 
> It would be great to read a comparison between MX292 and the new MX353 from you. By the way I don’t believe that the new one has much none in it, if any…

OK, I just had a look in my [pheromone](https://pheromonelabs.com/) draw, and the MX292 I’ve been using is version 1, Batch 14.

I’ve never tried MX353, but once I’m running low on my MX292, I’ll get a bottle and compare them.

how do you rate MX353? What makes you think there isn’t any none in there?

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pherobomb-is-an-apt-name-for-what-is-otherwise-known-as-mx292/61038)._