# Pheroproof Works!! **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [March 21, 2007, 2:48am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617 "2007-03-21T02:48:11Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 13\ **Page:** 4
**Author:** ![examine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/examine/32/1665_2.png) [@examine](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/examine)\ **Post date:** [March 28, 2007, 5:46am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/61 "2007-03-28T05:46:51Z")
> [@Futurist](#): > > Hey examine… as I say on the website before the testimonial section, all the names are changed to protect people’s privacy. 🙂 oh ok. i did not see that.🆒 ---
**Author:** ![djronin47](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/djronin47/32/665_2.png) [@djronin47](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/djronin47)\ **Post date:** [March 29, 2007, 9:17pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/62 "2007-03-29T21:17:37Z")
The new formula (according to Jasmin anyway), seems to be work friendly depending on the environment. I’ve worn it now a few days in a row a few sprays at a time without any negative problems. In fact had more rapport with coworkers. Don’t know if to attribute it to the Pheroproof or not, but ya never know. ---
**Author:** ![m3turbo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e274bd/32.png) [@m3turbo](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/m3turbo)\ **Post date:** [March 30, 2007, 2:25am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/63 "2007-03-30T02:25:40Z")
I don’t know how this thread turned into a forum to bash Androtics or some guys website but that was not my intention. I posted this because my experience with this product is that it was giving me hits that seemed not sexual at all but more feminine. My experience is that this mix is some kind of female bonding mix. I posted this thread to see if anyone else had results to compare to mine . Thats It. ---
**Author:** ![Futurist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecae2f/32.png) [@Futurist](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Futurist)\ **Post date:** [April 5, 2007, 1:03pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/64 "2007-04-05T13:03:16Z")
> [@djronin47](#): > > The new formula (according to Jasmin anyway), seems to be work friendly depending on the environment. I’ve worn it now a few days in a row a few sprays at a time without any negative problems. In fact had more rapport with coworkers. Don’t know if to attribute it to the Pheroproof or not, but ya never know. Just to clarify: we lowered the beta nol and replaced with more alpha nol in a second version of Pheromone Proof beta (pmx 101) toward the end of the beta test study thinking that it would make the mix even more of an attention getter/sexual vibe product. However, it wasn’t as effective as the original and was quickly switched back. Only a few guys on this forum received the second iteration, one being pheroquirck who quickly identified the change in formula. The pmx 101 most of you know and Pheromone Proof is designed to get attention and have a sexual vibe while keeping the negatives associated with those things (smell, pissing off people, etc) to an absolute minimum. The product is safe for work – just don’t wear as much as you would in sexual environments. Of course, there are always exceptions that occur, as everyone’s natural pheromone profile is different, but I’m confident everything I say will apply to most. ---
**Author:** ![PheroQuirk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9e8a1a/32.png) [@PheroQuirk](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/PheroQuirk)\ **Post date:** [April 5, 2007, 3:54pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/65 "2007-04-05T15:54:56Z")
> [@Jasmin](#): > > Hey guys, > > Pheromone Proof is a product created by forum member Futurist. It was tested here as MX101. It was well received. If you’re curious about it, send him a PM! I’m sure he’d be stoked to hear about it. That formula’s his baby. If you have it and are curious about usage, also give nbully79 a shoutout. I know he was a big MX101/PheroProof user back in the beta testing days. > > I mean, really, I know. The sales letter is jingoistic and excited. So what! He talks about _real_ hits _he_ got from it, that he told me about before he wrote it. Most of the testimonials come straight from the forum, and sometimes even my own personal experience with some of my tester boys around here. > > Sure, the tone may not be the type _we_ use, but we’re not against others using their own tone. It’s just like tone of voice. You have your tone of voice, I have mine. Thomas Lavoie SUPER has his! _laughs!_ Different people express things differently. > > The companies we don’t supply cross the line from peppy marketing to outright fraud. If you see any outright lies or fake studies on [Pheromoneproof.com](http://Pheromoneproof.com), let me know, and I’ll definitely talk to Futurist about it. > > I think the product matches it’s name, though. It’s not a light formula by any means. The purpose of it is very different than the sort of “business class” type pheromones we like to offer. Futurist’s formula is like you let a panther out of the bottle to go around mauling everyone, and I think it really _will_ offer tangible “pheromone proof” to most users. MX101 (pheroproof) does indeed rock. (I have been bugging Jasmin for it even during a time when it wasn’t being officially sold). I haven’t had problems with gay hits and have had lots of fun reactions from girls. Forget the marketing material - you have to persuade people to try something somehow, but that shouldn’t detract from what is a very solid product. Tacitus had fun with MX101 on leather, too. ---
**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2007, 2:11am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/66 "2007-04-06T02:11:48Z")
Well, I’m sold, looks like I’ll be buying some product. ---
**Author:** ![smn1234](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/smn1234/32/2430_2.png) [@smn1234](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/smn1234)\ **Post date:** [April 8, 2007, 9:36pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/67 "2007-04-08T21:36:41Z")
let us know how that goes ---
**Author:** ![Futurist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecae2f/32.png) [@Futurist](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Futurist)\ **Post date:** [April 9, 2007, 10:06pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/68 "2007-04-09T22:06:19Z")
Well, I tried to make the site cleaner and more organized. I have to admit, all the feedback here prompted me to make the change, so thanks. 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![nbully79](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c68b51/32.png) [@nbully79](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/nbully79)\ **Post date:** [April 9, 2007, 11:44pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/69 "2007-04-09T23:44:58Z")
It looks great except the link of “Turn-On In Male Sweat is Identified” links to your own website rather than the original news report. That might give a wrong impression! ---
**Author:** ![Carrie](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/carrie/32/1537_2.png) [@Carrie](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Carrie)\ **Post date:** [April 9, 2007, 11:49pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/70 "2007-04-09T23:49:54Z")
Love the look of the new site, Futurist. ---
**Author:** ![Futurist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecae2f/32.png) [@Futurist](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Futurist)\ **Post date:** [April 9, 2007, 11:58pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/71 "2007-04-09T23:58:39Z")
> [@nbully79](#): > > It looks great except the link of “Turn-On In Male Sweat is Identified” links to your own website rather than the original news report. That might give a wrong impression! For whatever reason, i can’t find the URL of the original article anymore, so I just used the image I had. But I see your point. Thanks nbully! ---
**Author:** ![Futurist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecae2f/32.png) [@Futurist](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Futurist)\ **Post date:** [April 9, 2007, 11:59pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/72 "2007-04-09T23:59:31Z")
> [@Carrie](#): > > Love the look of the new site, Futurist. Thank you Carrie! ---
**Author:** ![Rbt](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/rbt/32/2066_2.png) [@Rbt](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Rbt)\ **Post date:** [April 10, 2007, 1:37am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617/73 "2007-04-10T01:37:03Z")
Looks good, although some of the wording is awkward. As long as it gets the point across. Think I know what I’m going to be doing with my tax refund… [Previous page](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/pheroproof-works/2617.md?page=3)